[vchkpw] FW: chkuser 2.0 doesn't appear to be working

2006-03-09 Thread Lee Evans
Hi, I'm hoping somebody will be able to help me with a problem I appear to be having with chkuser 2.0. I built my qmail installation from the qmailrocks bundle, which I've done a few times in the past so I haven't had any problems there. I was looking for a suitalbe solution to block SMTP delive

Re: [vchkpw] FW: chkuser 2.0 doesn't appear to be working

2006-03-09 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 17.13 09/03/2006, you wrote: Hi, I'm hoping somebody will be able to help me with a problem I appear to be having with chkuser 2.0. I built my qmail installation from the qmailrocks bundle, which I've done a few times in the past so I haven't had any problems there. I was looking for a suit

Re: [vchkpw] FW: chkuser 2.0 doesn't appear to be working

2006-03-09 Thread Rick Macdougall
Lee Evans wrote: Hi, I'm hoping somebody will be able to help me with a problem I appear to be having with chkuser 2.0. ---snip--- However - if I run the new qmail-smtpd binary to check the funcationality as recommended it does not appear to be doing any rcpt to: checks - an ok result is retu

RE: [vchkpw] FW: chkuser 2.0 doesn't appear to be working

2006-03-09 Thread Lee Evans
> You should give more informations... > > Have you tried what's suggested in > http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser/documentation/faq > /enabling.html ? Thank you for the response. Sorry about not providing enough information I have followed the instructions at the above URL I hav

RE: [vchkpw] FW: chkuser 2.0 doesn't appear to be working

2006-03-09 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 17.43 09/03/2006, you wrote: > You should give more informations... > > Have you tried what's suggested in > http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser/documentation/faq > /enabling.html ? Thank you for the response. Sorry about not providing enough information I have followed the inst

RE: [vchkpw] FW: chkuser 2.0 doesn't appear to be working

2006-03-09 Thread Lee Evans
> Did you try what's suggested in > http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser/documentation/faq, > running manually qmail-smtpd? > > Did you check which is the user qmail-smtpd is running as? > > Tonino My qmail-smtpd is running through TCP Server as usver vpopmail and group vchkpw If I ru

RE: [vchkpw] FW: chkuser 2.0 doesn't appear to be working

2006-03-09 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 18.08 09/03/2006, you wrote: > Did you try what's suggested in > http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser/documentation/faq, > running manually qmail-smtpd? > > Did you check which is the user qmail-smtpd is running as? > > Tonino My qmail-smtpd is running through TCP Server as usver vpop

RE: [vchkpw] FW: chkuser 2.0 doesn't appear to be working

2006-03-09 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 18.08 09/03/2006, you wrote: > Did you try what's suggested in > http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser/documentation/faq, > running manually qmail-smtpd? > > Did you check which is the user qmail-smtpd is running as? > > Tonino My qmail-smtpd is running through TCP Server as usver vpop

RE: [vchkpw] FW: chkuser 2.0 doesn't appear to be working

2006-03-09 Thread Lee Evans
mail.leeevans.org > > If you compiled it with standard chkuser_settings.h, you > should see some logs during this emulated session. > > I have doubts chkuser code is called. I have the same doubts. I have CHKUSER_ENABLE_LOGGING CHKUSER_LOG_VALID_RCPT and CHKUSER_LOG_VALID_SENDER all defined. I

RE: [vchkpw] FW: chkuser 2.0 doesn't appear to be working

2006-03-09 Thread Michael Krieger
I should ask-  Is the domain set the 'bounce-no-mailbox' or do you have a catch all account?  If you have a catch-all account, checkuser disables itself (as all recipients are valid).  Disable the catch-all account if any and then see if it works.-M"tonix (Antonio Nati)" <[EMAIL PROTECTE

RE: [vchkpw] FW: chkuser 2.0 doesn't appear to be working

2006-03-09 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 20.32 09/03/2006, you wrote: mail.leeevans.org > > If you compiled it with standard chkuser_settings.h, you > should see some logs during this emulated session. > > I have doubts chkuser code is called. I have the same doubts. I have CHKUSER_ENABLE_LOGGING CHKUSER_LOG_VALID_RCPT and CHKUSER_L

RE: [vchkpw] FW: chkuser 2.0 doesn't appear to be working

2006-03-09 Thread Lee Evans
> You could post here (or send me) the routine where chkuser is > called (both for sender and recipients), just to see what to change. I have attached snippets from qmail-smtpd.c showing the send & rcpt routines and chkuser code I hope this is what you meant. > [Is chkuser.h included in a

RE: [vchkpw] FW: chkuser 2.0 doesn't appear to be working

2006-03-09 Thread Michael Krieger
#ifndef TLSThis means that it will only run chkuser if you didn't compile it with TLS support, which you might have done. If TLS is defined, I don't see chkuser being included in the executable. You need the chkuser calls in the TLS/SSL section as well.This is not an if structure as it would be i

RE: [vchkpw] FW: chkuser 2.0 doesn't appear to be working

2006-03-10 Thread Lee Evans
> #ifndef TLS > > This means that it will only run chkuser if you didn't > compile it with TLS support, which you might have done. If > TLS is defined, I don't see chkuser being included in the > executable. You need the chkuser calls in the TLS/SSL > section as well. > This is not an if str

RE: [vchkpw] FW: chkuser 2.0 doesn't appear to be working

2006-03-10 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 02.15 10/03/2006, you wrote: #ifndef TLS This means that it will only run chkuser if you didn't compile it with TLS support, which you might have done.  If TLS is defined, I don't see chkuser being included in the executable.  You need the chkuser calls in the TLS/SSL section as well. This is