Re: [vchkpw] Qmail rejection of overquota messages instead of bouncing

2007-12-12 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quey wrote: Rick Romero wrote: I went looking into this thinking chkuser would be a perfect place for the basic quota check. Of course that would be sort of vpopmail specific, but lo and behold, it's already in

Re: [vchkpw] Qmail rejection of overquota messages instead of bouncing

2007-12-12 Thread egoitz
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quey wrote: > Rick Romero wrote: > >> I went looking into this thinking chkuser would be a perfect place >> for the basic quota check. >> >> Of course that would be sort of vpopmail specific, but lo and >> behold, >> it's already

Re: [vchkpw] Qmail rejection of overquota messages instead of bouncing

2007-12-12 Thread egoitz
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> Quey wrote: >>> Rick Romero wrote: > I went looking into this thinking chkuser would be a perfect place > for the basic quota check. > > Of course that would be sort of vpopmail specific, but lo and behold, > it's already in there. >

Re: [vchkpw] Qmail rejection of overquota messages instead of bouncing

2007-12-11 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
Rick Romero ha scritto: Actually, as I was falling asleep last night (isn't that always the case), I wondered why chkuser.c sets maxmbxquota_limit = 0 and not 100 by default. It would seem to me if you're enabling the define, you would already expect that function to just work, n

Re: [vchkpw] Qmail rejection of overquota messages instead of bouncing

2007-12-11 Thread Rick Romero
Actually, as I was falling asleep last night (isn't that always the case), I wondered why chkuser.c sets maxmbxquota_limit = 0 and not 100 by default. It would seem to me if you're enabling the define, you would already expect that function to just work, not go to another place a

Re: [vchkpw] Qmail rejection of overquota messages instead of bouncing

2007-12-11 Thread Remo Mattei
Rick Romero wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> Quey wrote: >>> Rick Romero wrote: > I went looking into this thinking chkuser would be a perfect place > for the basic quota check. > > Of course that would be sort of vpopmail specific, but lo and behold,

Re: [vchkpw] Qmail rejection of overquota messages instead of bouncing

2007-12-11 Thread Rick Romero
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quey wrote: Rick Romero wrote: I went looking into this thinking chkuser would be a perfect place for the basic quota check. Of course that would be sort of vpopmail specific, but lo and behold, it's already in there. 'chkuser.c' v.2.0.8 if (vmaildir_readqu

Re: [vchkpw] Qmail rejection of overquota messages instead of bouncing

2007-12-11 Thread Quey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quey wrote: Rick Romero wrote: I went looking into this thinking chkuser would be a perfect place for the basic quota check. Of course that would be sort of vpopmail specific, but lo and behold, it's already in there. 'chkuser.c' v.2.0.8 if (vmaildir_readqu

Re: [vchkpw] Qmail rejection of overquota messages instead of bouncing

2007-12-10 Thread egoitz
> > > Rick Romero wrote: >> I went looking into this thinking chkuser would be a perfect place for >> the basic quota check. > > > >> Of course that would be sort of vpopmail specific, but lo and behold, >> it's already in there. > > > >> It's not as encompassing as Tom was envisioning, but it do

Re: [vchkpw] Qmail rejection of overquota messages instead of bouncing

2007-12-10 Thread egoitz
> Quey wrote: >> Rick Romero wrote: >>> I went looking into this thinking chkuser would be a perfect place >>> for the basic quota check. >>> >>> Of course that would be sort of vpopmail specific, but lo and behold, >>> it's already in there. >>> 'chkuser.c' v.2.0.8 >>> if (vmaildir_readquota(tmp_p

Re: [vchkpw] Qmail rejection of overquota messages instead of bouncing

2007-12-10 Thread Quey
Quey wrote: Rick Romero wrote: I went looking into this thinking chkuser would be a perfect place for the basic quota check. Of course that would be sort of vpopmail specific, but lo and behold, it's already in there. 'chkuser.c' v.2.0.8 if (vmaildir_readquota(tmp_path.s,format_maildirquota

Re: [vchkpw] Qmail rejection of overquota messages instead of bouncing

2007-12-10 Thread Rick Widmer
Rick Romero wrote: I went looking into this thinking chkuser would be a perfect place for the basic quota check. Of course that would be sort of vpopmail specific, but lo and behold, it's already in there. It's not as encompassing as Tom was envisioning, but it does do what the pare

Re: [vchkpw] Qmail rejection of overquota messages instead of bouncing

2007-12-10 Thread Quey
Rick Romero wrote: I went looking into this thinking chkuser would be a perfect place for the basic quota check. Of course that would be sort of vpopmail specific, but lo and behold, it's already in there. 'chkuser.c' v.2.0.8 if (vmaildir_readquota(tmp_path.s,format_maildirquota \ (use

Re: [vchkpw] Qmail rejection of overquota messages instead of bouncing

2007-12-10 Thread Rick Romero
On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 09:56 -0800, Tom Collins wrote: > On Dec 9, 2007, at 6:03 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I'm using John Simpsons last combined patch... I'm trying to know if I > > could any way... cause qmail to reject messages at smtp dialogue if > > users > > we're trying to deliver is

Re: [vchkpw] Qmail rejection of overquota messages instead of bouncing

2007-12-10 Thread Tom Collins
On Dec 9, 2007, at 6:03 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm using John Simpsons last combined patch... I'm trying to know if I could any way... cause qmail to reject messages at smtp dialogue if users we're trying to deliver is overquota instead of bouncing it... black lists are nowadays becomin

[vchkpw] Qmail rejection of overquota messages instead of bouncing

2007-12-09 Thread egoitz
Hi mates! I'm using John Simpsons last combined patch... I'm trying to know if I could any way... cause qmail to reject messages at smtp dialogue if users we're trying to deliver is overquota instead of bouncing it... black lists are nowadays becoming quite crazy IMHO but they're know blacklistin