Hello Glenn,
On Sunday, May 1, 2005 at 5:28:34 PM Glenn wrote:
>> You should at least examine smtp_rcpt and post it.
> Attached are the smtp_mail and smtp_rcpt from my qmailrocks source. My
> smtp_rcpt seems to be patched with some TLS code. I really don't need
> that since no clients use it. So
> How did you apply the patch over qmailrocks installation?
>
> Did you have any error from patch?
I tried the automatic patch and I got several errors. Attached is the
output from running the different pathces.
I then tried to patch it manually following the instructions on
http://www.interazio
> Please execute 'strace' as follows:
>
> strace -fF -o /tmp/qmail-smtpd.log -s 4096 ./qmail-smtpd
>
> and post the (complete) file /tpm/qmail-smtpd.log (as text
attachment).
The log file is attached.
The only changes I did to the file was to replace the actual domain with
example.com and on line
Hello Glenn,
On Thursday, April 28, 2005 at 11:44:06 PM Glenn wrote:
>> *exactly*? Compile qmail without and '-O' and with '-g2' and run
>> qmail-smtpd in 'dbg' (or similar).
>> Use 'strace' or 'truss' (with "follow fork" option)
> I'm obviously abit over my head here on the Linux platform. :-)
How did you apply the patch over qmailrocks installation?
Did you have any error from patch?
You should at least examine smtp_rcpt and post it.
Ciao,
Tonino
At 22.44 28/04/2005, you wrote:
> *exactly*? Compile qmail without and '-O' and with '-g2' and run
> qmail-smtpd in 'dbg' (or similar).
> Use
> *exactly*? Compile qmail without and '-O' and with '-g2' and run
> qmail-smtpd in 'dbg' (or similar).
> Use 'strace' or 'truss' (with "follow fork" option)
I'm obviously abit over my head here on the Linux platform. :-) I don't
have truss or dbg on my machine. I have strace however but I didn't
Hello Glenn,
On Thursday, April 28, 2005 at 9:55:57 PM Glenn wrote:
[chkusr patch applied to qmailrocks setup qmail]
> But when I test it afterwards I get a segmentation fault whenever I
> type "mail" on a line.
[...]
> Is there any way I can figure out exactly where in chkusr it fails?
*exactly