Re: [vchkpw] Rethinking qmail : was Re: [vchkpw] how use chkuser on "dmz"

2007-01-15 Thread Rick Widmer
Dave Richardson wrote: Guys, in the interest of advancing the science of vpopmail, would you please consider taking this discussion/argument/difference-of-opinion offline? +1 I'm keenly anxious to see the possible new directions that vpopmail may grow given the several threads of recent a

Re: [vchkpw] Rethinking qmail : was Re: [vchkpw] how use chkuser on "dmz"

2007-01-15 Thread Dave Richardson
Guys, in the interest of advancing the science of vpopmail, would you please consider taking this discussion/argument/difference-of-opinion offline? I'm keenly anxious to see the possible new directions that vpopmail may grow given the several threads of recent activity. Your energy and wisdo

Re: [vchkpw] Rethinking qmail : was Re: [vchkpw] how use chkuser on "dmz"

2007-01-15 Thread Christopher Chan
QMAIL was a secure product and a good academic programming model, ten years ago. Now, a modern MTA facing millions of emails has completely different problems from the ones Bernstein faced. But he made a closed architecture, not a modular one, adding a no-sense license. Hmm...qmail is STILL

Re: [vchkpw] Rethinking qmail : was Re: [vchkpw] how use chkuser on "dmz"

2007-01-15 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 14.14 15/01/2007, you wrote: People has not the courage to say that Bernstein design and coding is horrible. ??? QMAIL was a secure product and a good academic programming model, ten years ago. Now, a modern MTA facing millions of emails has completely different problems from the ones Be

Re: [vchkpw] Rethinking qmail : was Re: [vchkpw] how use chkuser on "dmz"

2007-01-15 Thread Christopher Chan
People has not the courage to say that Bernstein design and coding is horrible. ??? QMAIL was a secure product and a good academic programming model, ten years ago. Now, a modern MTA facing millions of emails has completely different problems from the ones Bernstein faced. But he made a c

Re: [vchkpw] Rethinking qmail : was Re: [vchkpw] how use chkuser on "dmz"

2007-01-11 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
rt programmers. Just my 1 eurocent. Tonino -M - Original Message From: tonix (Antonio Nati) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 6:31:40 AM Subject: [vchkpw] Rethinking qmail : was Re: [vchkpw] how use chkuser on "dmz" I'm

Re: [vchkpw] Rethinking qmail : was Re: [vchkpw] how use chkuser on "dmz"

2007-01-11 Thread Michael Krieger
: Thursday, January 11, 2007 6:31:40 AM Subject: [vchkpw] Rethinking qmail : was Re: [vchkpw] how use chkuser on "dmz" I'm thinking to extend chkuser, and add an smtp fake delivery for checking recipients existance on end systems (i.e. when domains are external and use me as pro

Re: [vchkpw] Rethinking qmail : was Re: [vchkpw] how use chkuser on "dmz"

2007-01-11 Thread Alessio Cecchi
Alle 12:31, giovedì 11 gennaio 2007, tonix (Antonio Nati) ha scritto: > I'm thinking to extend chkuser, and add an smtp fake delivery for > checking recipients existance on end systems (i.e. when domains are > external and use me as proxy SMTP). > > But I'm really tired to fight with qmail. Bernste

[vchkpw] Rethinking qmail : was Re: [vchkpw] how use chkuser on "dmz"

2007-01-11 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
I'm thinking to extend chkuser, and add an smtp fake delivery for checking recipients existance on end systems (i.e. when domains are external and use me as proxy SMTP). But I'm really tired to fight with qmail. Bernstein programming is accademic and heavy to use, license is criminal. Progra