On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 14:53, X-Istence wrote:
> >>The BSD code had a hard set limit, with the --enable-spam-threshold=15,
> >>which means that anything over 15 would get DELETED, and not just
> >>tagged, which is what SA does normally.
> > does normally? SA is only used for tagging mail. You
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 14:35, X-Istence wrote:
Ken Jones wrote:
On Friday 12 March 2004 6:35 am, Cristiano Deana wrote:
Il giorno Friday 12 March 2004 12:53, X-Istence mi scriveva:
Now spam threshold is hardcoded with --enable-spam-threshold=15
shouldn't be better to put
On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 14:35, X-Istence wrote:
> Ken Jones wrote:
> > On Friday 12 March 2004 6:35 am, Cristiano Deana wrote:
> >
> >>Il giorno Friday 12 March 2004 12:53, X-Istence mi scriveva:
> >>
> Now spam threshold is hardcoded with --enable-spam-threshold=15
> shouldn't be better to
Ken Jones wrote:
On Friday 12 March 2004 6:35 am, Cristiano Deana wrote:
Il giorno Friday 12 March 2004 12:53, X-Istence mi scriveva:
Now spam threshold is hardcoded with --enable-spam-threshold=15
shouldn't be better to put it in vlimits.default?
I think this should be made an option, if it is n
On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 13:01, Shouguan Lin wrote:
> Is it possible not to hard code the header?
> CRM114 just like SA can add a header like "X-CRM114-Status: SPAM" for
> identified spam emails. If the header is not hard coded, then vpopmail can
> work with both SA and CRM114 or other spam filters.
al Message -
From: "Ken Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 8:26 AM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Spamassassin: i wish..
> On Friday 12 March 2004 6:35 am, Cristiano Deana wrote:
> > Il giorno Friday 12 March 2004 12:53, X-Istence m
On Friday 12 March 2004 6:35 am, Cristiano Deana wrote:
> Il giorno Friday 12 March 2004 12:53, X-Istence mi scriveva:
> > > Now spam threshold is hardcoded with --enable-spam-threshold=15
> > > shouldn't be better to put it in vlimits.default?
> >
> > I think this should be made an option, if it i
Il giorno Friday 12 March 2004 12:53, X-Istence mi scriveva:
> > Now spam threshold is hardcoded with --enable-spam-threshold=15
> > shouldn't be better to put it in vlimits.default?
> I think this should be made an option, if it is not set, look for
> vlimits.default, if it is set, then use it h
Cristiano Deana wrote:
Now spam threshold is hardcoded with --enable-spam-threshold=15
shouldn't be better to put it in vlimits.default?
I think this should be made an option, if it is not set, look for
vlimits.default, if it is set, then use it hard coded, i prefer that as
i dont want vdeliverm
Now spam threshold is hardcoded with --enable-spam-threshold=15
shouldn't be better to put it in vlimits.default?
--
Cristiano Deana - FreeCRIS
"Ho iniziato a usare FreeBSD perche' m$ usava me. ed e' spiacevole"
pgp public key: http://freecris.bmm.it/cris.asc
in irc su: irc.azzurra.org #freebsd-
10 matches
Mail list logo
