On Thursday 07 July 2005 02:31 am, Peter Palmreuther wrote:
Hello List,
On Wednesday, July 6, 2005 at 3:36:39 PM patrick wrote:
Please post the output of
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-showctl
rcpthosts: (Default.) SMTP clients may send messages to any recipient.
*THIS* is your problem: you
Hi List,
Fixed the problem with smtp-auth...
Really a big Thanx to everyone trying to help.
Right now after several reinstallations another problem came up...
I can't send emails to my server pop-accounts... Of course I copied the
/var/qmail/users folder to my current running qmail-version, but
Hi List,
Fixed the problem with smtp-auth...
Really a big Thanx to everyone trying to help.
Right now after several reinstallations another problem came up...
I can't send emails to my server pop-accounts... Of course I copied
the
/var/qmail/users folder to my current running qmail-version,
Reinstalling qmail and moving stuff around like you did may have caused
locals to not contain what you think it contains.
Hope that helps,
hm... no... one more hint please?
I allready did this, i guess... and it worked. I also installed a new user over
Visas... can't send mails to that
On Jul 6, 2005, at 10:37 AM, Nick Harring wrote:
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at 213.239.219.168.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following
addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
:
Sorry. Although I'm listed as a
On Jul 6, 2005, at 10:37 AM, Nick Harring wrote:
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at 213.239.219.168.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following
addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
:
Sorry. Although I'm listed as a
I rechecked virtualdomains locals and rcpthosts... every domain ist there...
but still the same error-message...
any settings in vpopmail I need to take care of? Any settings in /etc/passwd
that could be wrong? Defaultdelivery should be ./Maildir/ right? Anything in
the run script for
On Wednesday 06 July 2005 03:22 pm, Nick Harring wrote:
If it's a local domain (users in /etc/passwd), it should appear in
/var/qmail/control/locals.
If it's a vpopmail domain, it should appear in
/var/qmail/control/virtualdomains.
For whatever reason vadddomain puts it in locals,
On Wednesday 06 July 2005 03:22 pm, Nick Harring wrote:
If it's a local domain (users in /etc/passwd), it should appear in
/var/qmail/control/locals.
If it's a vpopmail domain, it should appear in
/var/qmail/control/virtualdomains.
For whatever reason vadddomain puts it in
Hi Patrick,
pls. read:
http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/smtpauth.html
regards.
--eh.
At 19:18 05.07.2005 +0200, you wrote:
Hello List again,
How do I need to chmod /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw to use it the right way
with qmail smtp-auth-patched? Any other vpopmail-things i need to take care
of in
On Sunday 19 June 2005 13:53, Peter Palmreuther wrote:
And dovecot is configured to explicitly use 'vchkpw' and 'vchkpw'
is for sure the version from 'compile with
--enable-clear-password' build?
Yes, there is only one vchkpw on the system. If it's not using the
correct vchkpw then it's
On Sunday 19 June 2005 19:52, Casey Allen Shobe wrote:
That works, but that's not useful since none of the client logins
(pop3 or imap) update the password file. SMTP logins *do*, but
they are considerably more rare...
And many accounts exist for POP3 polling only, and the end user only
uses
On Jun 19, 2005, at 12:55 PM, Casey Allen Shobe wrote:
On Sunday 19 June 2005 19:52, Casey Allen Shobe wrote:
That works, but that's not useful since none of the client logins
(pop3 or imap) update the password file. SMTP logins *do*, but
they are considerably more rare...
And many accounts
On Saturday, June 18, 2005, 12:13:54 PM, Peter wrote:
AFAIR it does exactly what you said.
Nope, doesn't seem to. I rebuilt vpopmail with it enabled, edited
out the cleartext portions of a vpasswd file, and logged in a bunch
of times as that user. No updates to vpasswd. :(
How did you
On Jun 18, 2005, at 7:32 AM, Sylwester S. Biernacki wrote:
I've checked in mysql log what happens if I auth via POP3 - vpopmail
makes select from vpopmail where pw_name='x' and pw_domain='x.com'
and the connection is being closed. As far as I understand well I
should get an update to vpopmail
On Saturday 18 June 2005 10:13, Peter Palmreuther wrote:
How did you log in? SMTP-AUTH using CRAM-MD5?
PLAIN with IMAP (dovecot).
Cheers,
--
Casey Allen Shobe | http://casey.shobe.info
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | cell 425-443-4653
AIM Yahoo: SomeLinuxGuy | ICQ: 1494523
SeattleServer.com, Inc. |
On Saturday 18 June 2005 14:32, Sylwester S. Biernacki wrote:
Casey was talking about mysql not .cdb for user databases.
I certainly was not! I do not wish to use mysql, though I do want
to start using postgresql soon.
I will try rm'ing the cdb.
Cheers,
--
Casey Allen Shobe |
On Saturday 18 June 2005 10:13, Peter Palmreuther wrote:
Additionally you should make sure you rebuilt vpasswd.cdb after
you edited vpasswd, because else vchkpw will still see the clear
text password in vpasswd.cdb and therefore see no reason to
update anything. vchkpw does *not* look into
i've followed the qmailrocks installation method. But i've a problem i
need to port the old mails to this new mail server. the problem is the
old mail server is using mbox format and the newer one is using Maildir.
is there a way to convert these mbox messages to Maildir mails.
On Wed,
this question has nothing to do with the message you replied to. When posting
to the list to ask a new question you should start a new thread by using your
MTA's 'new' function.
On Friday 14 January 2005 02:32 am, Rizwan Iqbal Malik wrote:
i've followed the qmailrocks installation method. But
On Jan 14, 2005, at 12:32 AM, Rizwan Iqbal Malik wrote:
i've followed the qmailrocks installation method. But i've a problem i
need to port the old mails to this new mail server. the problem is the
old mail server is using mbox format and the newer one is using
Maildir.
is there a way to convert
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 22:52:54 -0800
Allie D [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok fine...I did exactly as it states and it didn't make a difference.
It takes from 20 to 40 seconds to send an email...that's horrible. If
I disable TLS it's immediateI can see qmail-smtpd just sitting
there while it's
Actually I did...but then I found the problem. It was the user and group
of the .pem files. It looks as though when my corn job ran
update_tmprsadh, the script changes the user and group. That broke it, I
updated the script to make the user vpopmail.vchkpw and it's all good. I
tested it from about
Thanks for the direction...but I appear to be following it as is. Stuff of
interest follows from my run file:
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 400 \
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -vR -l $LOCAL -c $MAXSMTPD \
-u $VPOPMAILUID -g $VPOPMAILGID 0 smtp \
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd \
Allie D wrote:
Thanks for the direction...but I appear to be following it as is. Stuff of
interest follows from my run file:
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 400 \
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -vR -l $LOCAL -c $MAXSMTPD \
-u $VPOPMAILUID -g $VPOPMAILGID 0 smtp \
Ok fine...I did exactly as it states and it didn't make a difference. It takes
from 20 to 40 seconds to send an email...that's horrible. If I disable TLS it's
immediateI can see qmail-smtpd just sitting there while it's
authenticating..the entire time. Should I use
Peter Palmreuther wrote:
However your Base64-encoded your login data, something went wrong.
There's a '\n' that shouldn't be there.
The correct B64-data would be:
Username: YnJvb2tzQGJyb29rc3JveS5jb20=
Password: amo=
Please try again with these data and report in.
Peter,
After tyring with these
Am Dienstag, 25. Mai 2004 19:18 schrieb Peter Palmreuther:
Hello Blist,
On Tuesday, May 25, 2004 at 6:22:11 PM you wrote (at least in part):
After tyring with these values I get:
[...]
If this segfaults too, one /might/ be able to guess why from the
strace and the last action done. If
Peter Palmreuther wrote:
Where
does the space character after '.com' comes from? Seems there's
something wrong with Base64-decoding / handing decoded values over to
vchkpw. I might be wrong, but all logs similar to this found in my
system logs have 'username:IP' instead of 'username :IP'.
Peter Palmreuther wrote:
Please replace your strace call by
strace -fF -s 4096 -o /tmp/qmail.log -e write ...
(replace '...' with 'softlimit -m ...' and so on).
else we'll not see what qmail hands over to vchkpw.
3906 write(2, "tcpserver: status: 0/20\n", 24) = 24
3906 write(2,
Am Sonntag, 23. Mai 2004 03:02 schrieb Eric Ziegast:
I know this is a shameless plug, but I'm a happy customer.
Have Inter7 do a SugarBox install for less time/money than
it takes to figure it out using online resources and googled
howtos. I didn't have to second-guess or debug anything.
Hello Peter,
Saturday, May 22, 2004, 6:34:03 PM, you wrote:
PP Hello List,
PP On Friday, May 21, 2004 at 5:21:36 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (at
PP least in part):
In the OLD days, people were happy with SMTP-Auth. I consider it LESS
security as SMTP after POP, because with SMTP-Auth, You sent
please remove this troll from the list. i'm tired of hearing this bigotry
on a technical mailing list. there is no content in this post that has
anything to do with either the list, or the thread in question.
At 11:06 AM 5/22/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Before You make comments, first read
Hello Peter,
Saturday, May 22, 2004, 9:03:21 PM, you wrote:
PP Hello List,
PP On Saturday, May 22, 2004 at 8:06:41 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (at
PP least in part):
PP [full quote snipped]
Before You make comments, first read the previous post.
PP Well, ok. *erm* I just recognize: already
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Your first message, which started this flamewar.
snip
Roy,
In the OLD days, people were happy with SMTP-Auth. I consider it LESS
security as SMTP after POP, because with SMTP-Auth, You sent Your
e-mailadress and Your password of Your mailbox
I know this is a shameless plug, but I'm a happy customer.
Have Inter7 do a SugarBox install for less time/money than
it takes to figure it out using online resources and googled
howtos. I didn't have to second-guess or debug anything.
Within 4 hours of the consultant logging in via SSH, I had
(Apologies for the delayed reply - I've been on the road)
On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 13:52, Peter Palmreuther wrote:
Even if RELAYCLIENT is set, (the Auth patched) qmail-smtpd *WILL* ask for
Authentication.
No. It'll /OFFER/ SMTP-ATUH, for those that want to set up their mail
client to always
Joel Newkirk schrieb:
- I want both method, SMTP-Auth and POP3-b4-SMTP, for allowing a client
to relay.
- I don't want the system to /require/ SMTP-Auth when POP3-b4-SMTP
already set RELAYCLIENT=
Hi,
I have such a setup.
I use qmail-spamcontrol+vpopmail+mysql+courier+relay-ctrl
my smtpd run
Hi Peter,
At 17:24 31.03.04 +0200, you wrote:
Hello Erwin,
On Wednesday, March 31, 2004 at 10:09:29 AM you wrote (at least in
part):
In case a client is accepted via pop-4-smtpd, the $RELAYCLIENT environment
variable is set. It might be useful to define this variable explicitely,
ie.
Okay, but should it be _allowing_ this as a password or don't you think that
it should reject it? There is a very big difference between 'webmaste' and
'webmaster23445' in terms of security, as I just found out.
The reasoning for my use of CRYPT is that most of my users are still from
when
I'm in no way stating that that webmaster21312 password is secure, however
I'd say that length issues are important here as often the complex parts of
a password are near the end [ie: dogguy45b]. If this was me, I'd completely
agree and never have a password like that. However it seems that
Kit, you're reinventing the wheel!
Yes, there are significant problems with simply merging together a
bunch of the qmail patches. It took me quite some time to get all the
patches I wanted to play nicely together. Now that it's done, feel
free to use it:
Hi Matt:
At 1:06 PM -0500 12/5/02, Matt Simerson wrote:
Kit, you're reinventing the wheel!
Thanks for getting in touch, but the attempt below is actually qmail
with just the SMTP-AUTH patch. I figure if I can't get 1 patch
working, my chances for the rest are pretty low. :}
Yes, there are
Hmm...I'm not sure if Bill Shupp's big patch will compile for BSD, but
it includes the SMTP-Auth patch...just a suggestion.
Regards,
Tren
-Original Message-
From: Kit Halsted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 9:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [vchkpw] Re:
your right. users were not vpopmail/vchkpw. working perfectly now. thanks
peter.
-chris
-Original Message-
From: Peter Palmreuther [mailto:lists;pitpalme.de]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 11:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [vchkpw] Re: smtp auth
Hello Lists,
On Thursday,
Hi John,
version 5.2.1
no extra compile option.
TIA,Paulo Henrique
Quoting John Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira writes:
Hi all,
I installed qmail smtp-remote-auth patch. It works well for outlook
client
At 1:46 PM -0200 10/24/02, Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira wrote:
Hi John,
version 5.2.1
no extra compile option.
TIA, Paulo Henrique
Somebody flame me if I'm wrong, but IIRC vpopmail 5.2.1 will not work
with SMTP-AUTH Eudora. Eudora requires CRAM-MD5, so vpopmail 5.3.6
looks like
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 15:35, Kit Halsted wrote:
Somebody flame me if I'm wrong, but IIRC vpopmail 5.2.1 will not work
with SMTP-AUTH Eudora. Eudora requires CRAM-MD5, so vpopmail 5.3.6
looks like the minimum version for your requirements. (5.3.9 is up on
the dev page, 5.3.11 is the most
48 matches
Mail list logo
