[vchkpw] vpopmail question

2010-04-07 Thread Victor Subervi
Hi; Is it possible to leave my current qmail and vpopmail installation alone and install vpopmaild by itself, or do I have to rip out my current installation of vpopmail? TIA, Victor !DSPAM:4bbcb19b32711200313826!

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail question

2010-04-07 Thread Matt Brookings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Victor Subervi wrote: Hi; Is it possible to leave my current qmail and vpopmail installation alone and install vpopmaild by itself, or do I have to rip out my current installation of vpopmail? Yes, but you should install vpopmaild from the

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail question

2010-04-07 Thread Victor Subervi
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Matt Brookings m...@inter7.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Victor Subervi wrote: Hi; Is it possible to leave my current qmail and vpopmail installation alone and install vpopmaild by itself, or do I have to rip out my current

[vchkpw] vusaged question

2009-04-07 Thread Wouter van der Schagt
Good morning all, Am I correct in assuming the the vusaged can be used for retrieving the current amount of storage used of a particular mailbox? If so, where does this information come from, is it the actual size used on the disk or is it based on a Maildir calculation? Is there any

Re: [vchkpw] vusaged question

2009-04-07 Thread Matt Brookings
? How stable is the 5.5 branch compared with 5.4.25 that we are using now with regards to standard functionality with Maildir++ support. I don't believe anything has changed except the quota support. So, I suppose the answer to your question is that it's better. As far as stability, I only have

[vchkpw] pop3 question

2009-03-11 Thread Remo Mattei
Hello since we are talking about Dovecot which I use for my imap, I wonder about what you guys think about using it as pop3 instead of using qmail pop3? Just wonder. (I use qmail pop3 now no problems whatsoever) Remo !DSPAM:49b7fcc732681694517887!

[vchkpw] User quota logic question

2009-02-19 Thread George Negoita
Hello! I have the following problem: when a message is delivered by vdelivermail, maildirsize is updated twice: 235 1 305 1 Apparently, first time it is updated before adding the Return-Path: and Delivered-To: headers. Digging into this issue, I think I found the problem. Before the actual

Re: [vchkpw] User quota logic question

2009-02-19 Thread Matt Brookings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 George Negoita wrote: Hello! I have the following problem: when a message is delivered by vdelivermail, maildirsize is updated twice: 235 1 305 1 George, there are indeed some issues with the quota system in vpopmail. I'm currently working to

[vchkpw] Question about courier-auth changes

2008-07-11 Thread Brian Lanier
Please, before anyone simply responds with switch to dovecot, I have reasons to stick with courier at this time despite the performance gains that I might receive from switching to dovecot. I have a setup which uses the shared folder setup on courier and I don't believe the shared folder

[vchkpw] Question about --without-users-big-dir

2007-10-12 Thread Paul Oehler
Hi folks, I'm considering re-compiling vpopmail with the --without-users-big-dir option. My understanding is this will 1) stop the directory hashing of usernames in the ~vpopmail/domains/domain.com/ directories 2) enable single character e-mail usernames First, is my understanding of those

RE: [vchkpw] vlimits question

2006-11-08 Thread Wouter van der Schagt
Thanks for the reply, that's very useful, another question. We're currently managing around 7000 popboxes and most domains Are in /1 /2 /A directories. Is it possible to do a du -sm * On all and sort the output, or is there a similar command In vpopmail that sorts the actual size of the popboxes

[vchkpw] vlimits question

2006-11-06 Thread Wouter van der Schagt
Guys, I have a few questions - Does modifying vlimits.default file require a recompile? - How to change all quota's from all popboxes? - Is there an Easy way to determine size of popboxen (list all) Sincerely, Steven

Re: [vchkpw] MAIL FROM question

2006-10-21 Thread Tom Collins
On Oct 20, 2006, at 8:14 PM, Rick Romero wrote: I have an auditor who is telling me that allowing non-SMTP-AUTHd clients to use a valid local user in MAIL FROM: is a potential spoof, and a security vulnerability. I don't know if it came up in the original thread, but enforcing that

Re: [vchkpw] MAIL FROM question

2006-10-21 Thread Rick Romero
Quoting Tom Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Oct 20, 2006, at 8:14 PM, Rick Romero wrote: I have an auditor who is telling me that allowing non-SMTP-AUTHd clients to use a valid local user in MAIL FROM: is a potential spoof, and a security vulnerability. I don't know if it came up in the

Re: [vchkpw] MAIL FROM question

2006-10-20 Thread Rick Romero
Update, in case anyone cares. 'Security' company doesn't know the difference between 'MAIL FROM:' and 'From:'. Not only do they not run their own mail server (supposedly to 'prevent any attacks from that vector'), their ISP's mail server actually creates a From: header from the Return-Path:

[vchkpw] MAIL FROM question

2006-10-03 Thread Rick Romero
Hi All, I have an auditor who is telling me that allowing non-SMTP-AUTHd clients to use a valid local user in MAIL FROM: is a potential spoof, and a security vulnerability. I just can't fathom how that is. As I understand it, MAIL FROM is only used for returning undeliverable mail. So, yes,

[vchkpw] qmailadmin question

2006-09-05 Thread saimir hafizi
Hi there, When accessing from web qmailadmin, I get this: Forbidden You don't have permission to access /cgi-bin/qmailadmin on this server. Apache/2.0.54 (Debian GNU/Linux) mod_python/3.1.3 Python/2.3.5 PHP/4.3.10-16 mod_ssl/2.0.54 OpenSSL/0.9.7e mod_perl/1.999.21 Perl/v5.8.4

Re: [vchkpw] qmailadmin question

2006-09-05 Thread Remo Mattei
who is it running under? check permission on that qmailadmin Remo saimir hafizi wrote: Hi there, When accessing from web qmailadmin, I get this: *Forbidden* You don't have permission to access /cgi-bin/qmailadmin on this server.

RE: [vchkpw] qmailadmin question

2006-09-05 Thread saimir hafizi
-Original Message- From: Remo Mattei [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 1:41 PM To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmailadmin question who is it running under? check permission on that qmailadmin Remo saimir hafizi wrote: Hi there, When accessing from

Re: [vchkpw] qmailadmin question

2006-09-05 Thread Remo Mattei
3 root root 4096 2006-08-18 22:56 vqadmin -Original Message- From: Remo Mattei [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 1:41 PM To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmailadmin question who is it running under? check permission on that qmailadmin

RE: [vchkpw] qmailadmin question

2006-09-05 Thread saimir hafizi
/usr/share/apache /usr/share/apache/default-configs/apache /usr/lib/apache /var/lib/apache /etc/apache -Original Message- From: Remo Mattei [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 1:59 PM To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmailadmin question who is apache

Re: [vchkpw] qmailadmin question

2006-09-05 Thread Remo Mattei
, September 05, 2006 1:59 PM To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmailadmin question who is apache running under? saimir hafizi wrote:

RE: [vchkpw] qmailadmin question

2006-09-05 Thread saimir hafizi
:06 PM To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmailadmin question what's the username that apache is running under? not were it is.. Remo saimir hafizi wrote: /usr/share/apache /usr/share/apache/default-configs/apache /usr/lib/apache /var/lib/apache /etc/apache -Original Message

RE: [vchkpw] qmailadmin question

2006-09-05 Thread saimir hafizi
Remo, Am I missing anything? -Original Message- From: Remo Mattei [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 2:06 PM To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmailadmin question what's the username that apache is running under? not were it is.. Remo saimir hafizi

Re: [vchkpw] qmailadmin question

2006-09-05 Thread Michael Johnson
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmailadmin question what's the username that apache is running under? not were it is.. Remo saimir hafizi wrote: /usr/share/apache /usr/share/apache/default-configs/apache /usr/lib/apache /var/lib/apache /etc/apache -Original Message- From: Remo Mattei

Re: [vchkpw] qmailadmin question

2006-09-05 Thread Michael Johnson
/etc/apache -Original Message- From: Remo Mattei [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 1:59 PM To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmailadmin question who is apache running under? saimir hafizi wrote:

RE: [vchkpw] qmailadmin question

2006-09-05 Thread saimir hafizi
OK, my apologies. So, how can I deal with this case then. Do I have to change anything in these two lines. -Original Message- From: Michael Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 3:49 PM To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmailadmin question Saimir

[vchkpw] vpopmail+ldap: question about passwords

2006-08-29 Thread Alessandro!
Hi, I'm evaluating about installation of vpopmail with LDAP support, but reading the file qmailUser.schema i didn't find the definition of password attribute, but only clearPassword attribute, for qmail Clear Password for APOP. The question is: vpopmail stores encrypted passwords in LDAP

[vchkpw] Stupid roaming-users question

2006-08-28 Thread up
I've configured this before, but I can't figure out why it isn't working this time (new server). I compiled vpopmail with roaming users, and it's putting the open-smtp where it always has, under ~vpopmail/etc/. In the past, tcpserver always found it, AND the /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb file even though

Re: [vchkpw] Re: Stupid roaming-users question

2006-08-28 Thread up
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 28 Aug 2006, Peter Palmreuther wrote: Hello List, On Monday, August 28, 2006 at 5:04:23 PM up wrote: I've configured this before, but I can't figure out why it isn't working

Re: [vchkpw] Re: Stupid roaming-users question

2006-08-28 Thread Alex Borges
I hope its the question thats stupid. We regretfully have no human-rights compatible fix for stupid users.

Re: [vchkpw] Re: Stupid roaming-users question

2006-08-28 Thread up
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, Alex Borges wrote: I hope its the question thats stupid. We regretfully have no human-rights compatible fix for stupid users. Sorry for the unwanted noise...in my rush to install a bazillion different packages, it didn't occur to me that FreeBSD ports would default to what

Re: [vchkpw] Re: Stupid roaming-users question

2006-08-28 Thread Bert JW Regeer
On Aug 28, 2006, at 11:56:03 MST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, Alex Borges wrote: I hope its the question thats stupid. We regretfully have no human-rights compatible fix for stupid users. Sorry for the unwanted noise...in my rush to install a bazillion different

[vchkpw] a migration question

2006-07-01 Thread Paul Theodoropoulos
i'm looking at a migration of users to a new server, located elsewhere, in the coming months. i'm building a server virtually identical to what my systems are currently running on. using vpopmail 5.4.10, with mysql db backend. something that intrigued me was this old email that's quoted in

[vchkpw] --enable-mysql-limits question

2006-03-22 Thread Juan Jose Miquel
Hello everybody, I changed my configuration to use --enable-mysql-limits, but I don't find any info inside the DB.the files maildirsize where generated again.¿How should be working this configuration option?Thanks,Juan

Re: [vchkpw] --enable-mysql-limits question

2006-03-22 Thread Shane Chrisp
On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 12:21 -0400, Juan Jose Miquel wrote: Hello everybody, I changed my configuration to use --enable-mysql-limits, but I don't find any info inside the DB. the files maildirsize where generated again. ¿How should be working this configuration option? Thanks, Juan

Re: [vchkpw] --enable-mysql-limits question

2006-03-22 Thread Juan Jose Miquel
and in the mysql DB). So my new question is: ¿Is there any function that manipulates both registers or do I have to duplicate any change twice. Best Regards Juan - Original Message - From: Shane Chrisp [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 12:36 PM Subject

Re: [vchkpw] --enable-mysql-limits question

2006-03-22 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
is that the info is generated in two places (the maildirsize file and in the mysql DB). So my new question is: ¿Is there any function that manipulates both registers or do I have to duplicate any change twice. you can't store the maildirsize in mysql. qmail-pop3d, courier-imapd, etc are not SQL aware

[vchkpw] Logging question - Who is popping mail?

2006-03-13 Thread Dave Richardson
I'm sorry to ask a basic question, but I've run throughout my system and cannot find the answer. If I've setup vpopmail/mysql using Netqmail and appropriate snippets from Michael Bowe's webmail Howto... Q: Where would I find of log of users who are POP'ing email from my server? /var/log

[vchkpw] Requeueing question

2006-02-17 Thread Joshua Megerman
qmail to immediately retry the message as the deferral was on the local system rather than cause by the remote system. After looking at how qmail runs its queue, I don't think there's a way to do it, but I figured I'd throw the question out anyway. I'll be making the patch available at some point

Re: [vchkpw] qmailtap question

2006-02-07 Thread John Simpson
, then there shouldn't be much of a performance hit at all. however, my question isn't so much about performance as it is about whether or not it's safe to integrate the qmailtap patch into my combined patch, knowing that this will dump it on a lot of qmailrocks users. i know it's going to cause questions, i

Re: [vchkpw] qmailtap question

2006-02-07 Thread Adam Ossenford
did you do mine first and then qmailtap, or the other way around? did the patch apply cleanly or were there any rejects which had to be handled manually? Actually, I had tried do install both patches one after the other and was not able to ever get it to work. The two patches had a couple

Re: [vchkpw] qmailtap question

2006-02-07 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
will understand it as well... but because my combined patch has been adopted by qmailrocks, if i were to add inter7's qmailtap patch (or any other QUEUE_EXTRA patch) i would be flooded with question from typical qmailrocks users about why their server is sending multiple copies of every message

Re: [vchkpw] qmailtap question

2006-02-06 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Saturday 04 February 2006 23:47, John Simpson wrote: just a quick question. i'm maintaining the monster combined patch that qmailrocks has adopted, and over the past few months i've been hammered with questions about using QUEUE_EXTRA. apparently it works with older versions of my combined

Re: [vchkpw] qmailtap question

2006-02-06 Thread John Simpson
adopted by qmailrocks, if i were to add inter7's qmailtap patch (or any other QUEUE_EXTRA patch) i would be flooded with question from typical qmailrocks users about why their server is sending multiple copies of every message and killing their server. i'm sure you of all people know

Re: [vchkpw] qmailtap question

2006-02-06 Thread Adam Ossenford
my answer to this question is usually i'm not going to add it to my combined patch- if you can add it, more power to you but i figured in the interest of fairness i would at least ask the inter7 guys about it... the qmailtap web page lists this as one of the places to discuss qmailtap, and i

[vchkpw] qmailtap question

2006-02-04 Thread John Simpson
just a quick question. i'm maintaining the monster combined patch that qmailrocks has adopted, and over the past few months i've been hammered with questions about using QUEUE_EXTRA. apparently it works with older versions of my combined patch, but since i added the ext_todo patch (which solves

Re: [vchkpw] a vpopbull question

2005-10-18 Thread Pedro Ribeiro
cuentas.txt, in fact, vpopbull skip to list accounts in a alias domain. the question is: how can get the missing alias mails? I really need all accounts beause i need then for use in a recipients features for spamcontrol pathc thanks in advance Mario -- Best regards, Pedro

Re: [vchkpw] a vpopbull question

2005-10-10 Thread John Simpson
On 2005-10-07, at 1830, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you may want to look at my mkvalidrcptto script- I'm interested on your script mkvalidrcptto but it has not a help. what is the syntax? there's no real syntax- you just run it. it scans the directories it needs and sends the output to

RE: [vchkpw] a vpopbull question

2005-10-10 Thread mbeltran
thank you very much work fine :) -Mensaje original- De: John Simpson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: Monday, October 10, 2005 12:13 AM Para: vchkpw@inter7.com Asunto: Re: [vchkpw] a vpopbull question On 2005-10-07, at 1830, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you may want to look

Re: [vchkpw] a vpopbull question

2005-10-07 Thread John Simpson
) skipping simon.intertel.hn (alias of hn2.com) ... When i look the file cuentas.txt, in fact, vpopbull skip to list accounts in a alias domain. the question is: how can get the missing alias mails? short answer: you can't. it's written so that your users will see one copy of the message when

RE: [vchkpw] a vpopbull question

2005-10-07 Thread mbeltran
Mr. Simpson: thank you for your advice. you may want to look at my mkvalidrcptto script- I'm interested on your script mkvalidrcptto but it has not a help. what is the syntax? it scans the system and vpopmail directories and generates a list of valid email addresses, with @domain for domains

[vchkpw] question about qmail-tap

2005-10-04 Thread Paul Theodoropoulos
as you might guess from my previous message, i'm installing qmail-tap for the first time. something that's not entirely clear is whether qmail-tap is 'self filtering' in the following sense. if i set up a taps file like this: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED] will qmail-tap know to not tap

Re: [vchkpw] question about qmail-tap

2005-10-04 Thread Paul Theodoropoulos
to ship it to a different domain or server. make sense? gee, i'm on a roll. answered my own question by doing - duh - an experiment. set up the taps file as above, it didn't tap it's own messages. kewl. also, just a note on my previous message about the README errno line - on solaris

[vchkpw] Re: headers question OPEN RELAY

2005-09-12 Thread kalin mintchev
Although someone may have asked you for this, you could post the results of qmail-showctl. qmail home directory: /var/qmail. user-ext delimiter: -. paternalism (in decimal): 2. silent concurrency limit: 509. subdirectory split: 23. user ids: 1002, 1001, 1003, 0, 1004, 1006, 1005, 1007. group

[vchkpw] Re: a vpopbull question

2005-08-09 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello List, On Monday, August 8, 2005 at 11:34:54 PM mbeltran wrote: Somebody knows how can I post an email in html format to serveral virtualdomains in my system box with vpopbull? Yes. Create the mail using your favorite MUA, save the mail source to your server into a text file. Use

RE: [vchkpw] Re: a vpopbull question

2005-08-09 Thread mbeltran
sent emails in text format. what can I do? Best regards. Mario -Mensaje original- De: Peter Palmreuther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 1:50 AM Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] in vpop Asunto: [vchkpw] Re: a vpopbull question Hello List, On Monday, August 8, 2005

Re: [vchkpw] Re: a vpopbull question

2005-08-09 Thread Rick Macdougall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Peter yesterday, after my first post, I have made test. I made a file with html code inside it. The header is: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 6:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: otra prueba m=E1s... que

[vchkpw] a vpopbull question

2005-08-08 Thread mbeltran
Hi all Somebody knows how can I post an email in html format to serveral virtualdomains in my system box with vpopbull? Thanks in advance Mario

Re: [vchkpw] a vpopmail+openldap question

2005-07-18 Thread Mathieu CHATEAU
Hello Igor, you can safely ignore this message, it's normal ! just mean the connection is not yet opened cheers, Monday, July 11, 2005, 8:18:17 AM, you wrote: IP when i start slapd in debug mode appears some strange output: IP = send_search_entry: conn 39 exit. IP send_ldap_result: conn=39

[vchkpw] a vpopmail+openldap question

2005-07-11 Thread Igor Puorro
when i start slapd in debug mode appears some strange output: = send_search_entry: conn 39 exit. send_ldap_result: conn=39 op=1 p=3 send_ldap_response: msgid=2 tag=101 err=0 ber_flush: 14 bytes to sd 20 : 30 0c 02 01 02 65 07 0a 01 00 04 00 04 00 0e ldap_write: want=14,

Re: [vchkpw] SENDER_NOCHECK Question

2005-06-23 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 22.35 22/06/2005, you wrote: Does SENDER_NOCHECK=1 in tcp.smtp mean that all aspects of chkuser get bypassed when coming from that specific IP? No. It means that no check is done on sender e-mail address (formal check on address). I've been trying to implement this feature and having trouble

Re: [vchkpw] SENDER_NOCHECK Question

2005-06-23 Thread Anthony Clodfelter
tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: At 22.35 22/06/2005, you wrote: Does SENDER_NOCHECK=1 in tcp.smtp mean that all aspects of chkuser get bypassed when coming from that specific IP? No. It means that no check is done on sender e-mail address (formal check on address). I've been trying to

[vchkpw] SENDER_NOCHECK Question

2005-06-22 Thread Anthony Clodfelter
Does SENDER_NOCHECK=1 in tcp.smtp mean that all aspects of chkuser get bypassed when coming from that specific IP? I've been trying to implement this feature and having trouble getting any entry in tcp.smtp to bypass the chkuser rules. My current tcp.smtp is 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=

Re: [vchkpw] Question about domains in vpopmail

2005-05-14 Thread Sylwester S. Biernacki
On Saturday, May 14, 2005, 7:44:02 AM, Fernando wrote: People, after i rebuild new 5.4.10 vpopmail version, when i add a new domain from CLI, breaks the typical structure of ~vpopmail/domains/domain.com for this one ~vpopmail/domains/1/domain.com with numbers like 2,3, etc ... before

Re: [vchkpw] Question about domains in vpopmail

2005-05-14 Thread Fernando Milovich
Thanks so much Sylwester ! - Original Message - From: Sylwester S. Biernacki [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Fernando Milovich vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 5:06 AM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Question about domains in vpopmail On Saturday, May 14, 2005, 7:44:02 AM, Fernando wrote

[vchkpw] simscan question

2005-05-14 Thread Prosite
Sorry, if I´m posting to the wrong list ... Only 2 quick questions: 1. on http://www.inter7.com/?page=simscan it says: "during the SMTP conversation so the email never makes it into your computers" So far I use qmail-scanner which is putting it on the hdd and than has clamav running over

[vchkpw] Re: [toaster] simscan question

2005-05-14 Thread Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
Prosite wrote: Sorry, if I´m posting to the wrong list ... There is a simscan list. Check here : http://inter7.com/?page=simscan Only 2 quick questions: 1. on http://www.inter7.com/?page=simscan it says: during the SMTP conversation so the email never makes it into your computers So far I

[vchkpw] Question about domains in vpopmail

2005-05-13 Thread Fernando Milovich
People, after i rebuild new 5.4.10 vpopmail version, when i add a new domain from CLI, breaks the typical structure of ~vpopmail/domains/domain.com for this one ~vpopmail/domains/1/domain.com with numbers like 2,3, etc ... before the domain ... why it is this happening? Thanks so much,

RE: [vchkpw] vaddaliasdomain question

2005-04-05 Thread Jason Wilkinson
Andrej wrote: Hello List, I'm using vpopmail-5.4.10 and netqmail-1.05 - thanks for the software :-) I have one question concerning the vaddaliasdomain command. Where can I find the assignment between the real and alias domain when I add an alias domain? By adding an alias domain

Re: [vchkpw] vaddaliasdomain question

2005-04-05 Thread Tom Collins
On Apr 5, 2005, at 9:05 AM, Jason Wilkinson wrote: The primary/secondary domain association is recorded in the /var/qmail/users/assign file. vdominfo can also report on the real domain for an alias domain (I think). -- Tom Collins - [EMAIL PROTECTED] QmailAdmin: http://qmailadmin.sf.net/

Re: [vchkpw] quotawarn question

2005-03-24 Thread Greg Swift
Tom Collins wrote: On Mar 23, 2005, at 1:10 PM, Juan Enciso Condeña wrote: But also I have noticed that this file not delete as soon as the quota has diminished, which brings like consequence that when it is arrived again at the quota limit, no alert quota is sent again. Is it a bug or what

Re: [vchkpw] quotawarn question

2005-03-24 Thread Tom Collins
On Mar 24, 2005, at 8:47 AM, Greg Swift wrote: It's not a bug. Only one warning is sent every 24 hours. The file needs to stay there so that a user who's close to their quota doesn't get repeated warnings every time the delete mail and have more arrive. actually considering it NEVER removes

Re: [vchkpw] quotawarn question

2005-03-24 Thread Greg Swift
Tom Collins wrote: On Mar 24, 2005, at 8:47 AM, Greg Swift wrote: It's not a bug. Only one warning is sent every 24 hours. The file needs to stay there so that a user who's close to their quota doesn't get repeated warnings every time the delete mail and have more arrive. actually

Re: [vchkpw] Quota Question

2005-03-23 Thread Rick van Vliet
MacConnect Home Office wrote: Is there a command in vpopmail that I can use to set quota limits on every domain on my system? I don't want to set per account quotas, but rather a per domain disk limit. Is there an easy way to do this, other than by modifying each domains' .qmailadmin-limits

Re: [vchkpw] Quota Question

2005-03-23 Thread Tom Collins
On Mar 23, 2005, at 7:47 AM, Rick van Vliet wrote: MacConnect Home Office wrote: Is there a command in vpopmail that I can use to set quota limits on every domain on my system? I don't want to set per account quotas, but rather a per domain disk limit. Is there an easy way to do this, other

Re: [vchkpw] Quota Question

2005-03-23 Thread MacConnect Home Office
So is there a way to use vsetuserquota to set quotas on all accounts on the system, regardless of their domain? Also, is there a way to configure vpopmail so that all new accounts created have the same quota figure? Thanks On Mar 23, 2005, at 8:57 AM, Tom Collins wrote: On Mar 23, 2005, at

Re: [vchkpw] Quota Question

2005-03-23 Thread Tom Collins
On Mar 23, 2005, at 8:11 AM, MacConnect Home Office wrote: So is there a way to use vsetuserquota to set quotas on all accounts on the system, regardless of their domain? Get a list of domains with `vdominfo -n` and then call vsetuserquota with the domain name to update quota for all users in

Re: [vchkpw] Quota Question

2005-03-23 Thread Tom Collins
On Mar 23, 2005, at 8:30 AM, MacConnect Home Office wrote: One last question.how can I tell whether qmailadmin is configured with the -disable-modify-quota option? Log in as a postmaster, modify a user and see if it lets you modify the quota. -- Tom Collins - [EMAIL PROTECTED] QmailAdmin

Re: [vchkpw] Quota Question

2005-03-23 Thread MacConnect Home Office
It doesn't let me modify the quota, but when I create a new user in that domain, it has NOQUOTA. On Mar 23, 2005, at 12:08 PM, Tom Collins wrote: On Mar 23, 2005, at 8:30 AM, MacConnect Home Office wrote: One last question.how can I tell whether qmailadmin is configured with the -disable

[vchkpw] quotawarn question

2005-03-23 Thread Juan Enciso Condeña
Hi vpopmail users I'm using qmail + vpopmail-5.4.9 + sqwebmail-4.0.7 Recently, I enabled the warning quota message. I create the file .quotawarn.msg into domain directory, and it work. But I noticed that when reach the percent limit, the vpopmail create the file named quotawarn into user

Re: [vchkpw] Quota Question

2005-03-23 Thread Tom Collins
Then that must be the default for the domain. On Mar 23, 2005, at 12:46 PM, MacConnect Home Office wrote: It doesn't let me modify the quota, but when I create a new user in that domain, it has NOQUOTA. -- Tom Collins - [EMAIL PROTECTED] QmailAdmin: http://qmailadmin.sf.net/ Vpopmail:

Re: [vchkpw] quotawarn question

2005-03-23 Thread Tom Collins
On Mar 23, 2005, at 1:10 PM, Juan Enciso Condeña wrote: Recently, I enabled the warning quota message. I create the file .quotawarn.msg into domain directory, and it work. But I noticed that when reach the percent limit, the vpopmail create the file named quotawarn into user directory. For

Re: [vchkpw] valias / extension address question

2005-02-23 Thread Leto Tokarev
Now emails sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] getting delivered to [EMAIL PROTECTED] How can I prevent this? Mail sent to 'user-name' should go into that box. Mail to 'user-anythingelse' will go to user. Nope. 'user-name' box always empty, getting no mail. I'd like to have [EMAIL

[vchkpw] valias / extension address question

2005-02-22 Thread Leto Tokarev
Hi! Scenario: [EMAIL PROTECTED] valias -s [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have another box, named [EMAIL PROTECTED] Now emails sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] getting delivered to [EMAIL PROTECTED] How can I prevent this? I'd like to have [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [vchkpw] valias / extension address question

2005-02-22 Thread Leto Tokarev
I'd like to have [EMAIL PROTECTED] higher preference, or similar. Sorry: vpopmail 5.4.9 with --enable-qmail-ext Leto

Re: [vchkpw] valias / extension address question

2005-02-22 Thread Tom Collins
On Feb 22, 2005, at 7:00 AM, Leto Tokarev wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] valias -s [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Does this have anything to do with the problem you're having below? Mail sent to 'x' will go to 'user'. I have another box, named [EMAIL PROTECTED] Now

Re: [vchkpw] disable_smtp / no_smtp gid flag smtp-auth question

2004-11-23 Thread Steve
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:20:15 -0800, Tom Collins wrote:  On Nov 22, 2004, at 3:30 PM, Rick Macdougall wrote:  Tom Collins wrote:  On Nov 22, 2004, at 12:01 PM, Steve wrote:  Please could someone tell me exactly what is the use of the  disable_smtp  no_smtp gid flag ? I ask that because I use  qmail

Re: [vchkpw] disable_smtp / no_smtp gid flag smtp-auth question

2004-11-23 Thread Steve
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:20:15 -0800, Tom Collins wrote:  On Nov 22, 2004, at 3:30 PM, Rick Macdougall wrote:  Tom Collins wrote:  On Nov 22, 2004, at 12:01 PM, Steve wrote:  Please could someone tell me exactly what is the use of the  disable_smtp  no_smtp gid flag ? I ask that because I use  qmail

[vchkpw] disable_smtp / no_smtp gid flag smtp-auth question

2004-11-22 Thread Steve
Hi everybody, Please could someone tell me exactly what is the use of the disable_smtp no_smtp gid flag ? I ask that because I use qmail + vpopmail (5.4.7) + smtp-auth, and the above settings don't have any effect when I connect with an authenticated user to my smtp server... I can still

Re: [vchkpw] disable_smtp / no_smtp gid flag smtp-auth question

2004-11-22 Thread Tom Collins
On Nov 22, 2004, at 12:01 PM, Steve wrote: Please could someone tell me exactly what is the use of the disable_smtp no_smtp gid flag ? I ask that because I use qmail + vpopmail (5.4.7) + smtp-auth, and the above settings don't have any effect when I connect with an authenticated user to my

Re: [vchkpw] disable_smtp / no_smtp gid flag smtp-auth question

2004-11-22 Thread Rick Macdougall
Tom Collins wrote: On Nov 22, 2004, at 12:01 PM, Steve wrote: Please could someone tell me exactly what is the use of the disable_smtp no_smtp gid flag ? I ask that because I use qmail + vpopmail (5.4.7) + smtp-auth, and the above settings don't have any effect when I connect with an

Re: [vchkpw] disable_smtp / no_smtp gid flag smtp-auth question

2004-11-22 Thread Steve
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 13:34:31 -0800, Tom Collins wrote:  On Nov 22, 2004, at 12:01 PM, Steve wrote:  Please could someone tell me exactly what is the use of the  disable_smtp  no_smtp gid flag ? I ask that because I use qmail  + vpopmail (5.4.7) + smtp-auth, and the above settings don't have  any

Re: [vchkpw] disable_smtp / no_smtp gid flag smtp-auth question

2004-11-22 Thread Tom Collins
On Nov 22, 2004, at 3:30 PM, Rick Macdougall wrote: Tom Collins wrote: On Nov 22, 2004, at 12:01 PM, Steve wrote: Please could someone tell me exactly what is the use of the disable_smtp no_smtp gid flag ? I ask that because I use qmail + vpopmail (5.4.7) + smtp-auth, and the above settings

[vchkpw] Question on msg/hour graph

2004-09-17 Thread Matt Hoppes
Hi, On the inter7 qmailmrtg7 graphs.. what exactly is the msg/hour graph displaying? I know MRTG takes 5 minute averages but what exactly is it averaging? I know it's doing the messages.. but how do you do msg/hour in a 5 minute average? I guess I'm missing some sort of logic there..

Re: [vchkpw] Question on msg/hour graph

2004-09-17 Thread Ken Jones
On Friday 17 September 2004 07:34 am, Matt Hoppes wrote: Hi, On the inter7 qmailmrtg7 graphs.. what exactly is the msg/hour graph displaying? It is displaying the averaged number of messages per hour. I know MRTG takes 5 minute averages but what exactly is it averaging? Every 5

Re: [vchkpw] Question on msg/hour graph

2004-09-17 Thread Matt Hoppes
Got it.. I just wanted to make sure that I was understanding what it was.. thanks :) On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 10:34:40 -0500, Ken Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 17 September 2004 07:34 am, Matt Hoppes wrote: Hi, On the inter7 qmailmrtg7 graphs.. what exactly is the msg/hour graph

[vchkpw] Quota Question

2004-09-09 Thread Matthew Walker
I just converted my vpopmail install to use MySQL in preparation for setting up a nice admin screen for my users, and noticed something. Some of my users have a rather odd quota setting, while others have what looks right. Normal: 1 Odd: 3000,1000C What's up with the second one? I

Re: [vchkpw] Quota Question

2004-09-09 Thread Tom Collins
On Sep 9, 2004, at 8:42 AM, Matthew Walker wrote: Some of my users have a rather odd quota setting, while others have what looks right. Normal: 1 Odd: 3000,1000C What's up with the second one? I can't find any documentation about that syntax anywhere. Is it valid? And if so, what does

Re: [vchkpw] Quota Question

2004-09-09 Thread Matthew Walker
Ahha. Thanks for filling me in on that. I would guess it probably assumes a number is 'S' if it isn't specified, so that syntax would still be valid. At least now I know I'm not going crazy. ;) On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 09:18:14 -0700, Tom Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sep 9, 2004, at 8:42 AM,

  1   2   3   4   5   >