Re: [announce] Sharebox, a FUSE filesystem relying on git-annex

2011-04-03 Thread Dieter Plaetinck
On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 11:18:05 -0400 Joey Hess wrote: > Dieter Plaetinck wrote: > > > I think having support for this in git-annex would be very useful, > > even if it's not that efficient: if this can be dealt with in > > git-annex, individual "higherlevel" projects like sharebox and > > dvcs-auto

Re: [announce] Sharebox, a FUSE filesystem relying on git-annex

2011-04-03 Thread Joey Hess
Richard Hartmann wrote: > I know Joey pondered this as well, you will find some references on > git-annex' ikiwiki. This is needed for S3 in the medium term, anyway. > > Basically, the plan is to encrypt the files with a symmetric key and > then allow access to that key via other keys. That way, y

vcsdctl as potential config, data & code repo manager. (was: Re: mr feature request: default to ~/.mrconfig when there is no .mrconfig in $PWD)

2011-04-03 Thread Richard Hartmann
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 17:13, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: > If I tell mr explicitly to use a specific config, then I think it would be > reasonable behavior to trust that file.  In fact, the whole reason I put the > config in $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/mr/config, is to keep my home directory clean, an > ~/.

Re: [announce] Sharebox, a FUSE filesystem relying on git-annex

2011-04-03 Thread Joey Hess
Dieter Plaetinck wrote: > I think having support for this in git-annex would be very useful, > even if it's not that efficient: if this can be dealt with in > git-annex, individual "higherlevel" projects like sharebox and > dvcs-autosync have less headaches. Not to mention > sharebox/dvcs-autosyn

Re: mr feature request: default to ~/.mrconfig when there is no .mrconfig in $PWD

2011-04-03 Thread Dieter Plaetinck
On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 22:29:44 -0400 Joey Hess wrote: > Richard Hartmann wrote: > > the second request is that running mr anywhere without a .mrconfig in > > $PWD, I would love to have mr read ~/.mrconfig by default (or possibly > > $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/mr/config (no leading dot)). That would make runni

Re: [announce] Sharebox, a FUSE filesystem relying on git-annex

2011-04-03 Thread Richard Hartmann
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 13:18, Rene Mayrhofer wrote: > I've also been thinking about transparent encryption for git/git-annex/bup > backends, but this is not even in a real design phase yet. If anybody is > interested in discussing the issues involved with backing up to a > potentially untrusted r

Re: [announce] Sharebox, a FUSE filesystem relying on git-annex

2011-04-03 Thread Richard Hartmann
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 11:35, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: > - centralized: have 1 (or more) remotes that always keep a copy of the files > which are being removed on all other remotes, these would be backup-nodes, > they don't follow the strict "always in sync" rule that applies to the > regular n

Re: [announce] Sharebox, a FUSE filesystem relying on git-annex

2011-04-03 Thread Dieter Plaetinck
On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 23:19:52 -0400 Joey Hess wrote: > Dieter Plaetinck wrote: > > @Joey: you mentioned you think inotify might be a better > > backend/paradigm for this than fuse, so do you think implementing > > git-annex in something like dvcs-autosync is feasible? and/or > > preferable? > > Fe

Re: mr feature request: support variables in .mrconfig

2011-04-03 Thread Richard Hartmann
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 05:07, Joey Hess wrote: > It's not documented, so perhaps it's a bug, but you can already do this. Ie: Works perfectly, thanks. As the manpage listed absolute and relative explicitly I didn't think of trying variables. Richard

Re: mr feature request: default to ~/.mrconfig when there is no .mrconfig in $PWD

2011-04-03 Thread Richard Hartmann
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 04:29, Joey Hess wrote: > This is the default behavior from mr 1.00 on. In previous versions, > it can be enabled by the -p flag. richih@adamantium ~ % mr update [...] mr update: finished (2 ok; 1 failed) richih@adamantium ~ % cd killme richih@adamantium ~/killme % mr upda