On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Adam Spiers vcs-h...@adamspiers.org wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Joey Hess j...@kitenet.net wrote:
Adam Spiers wrote:
However, the basename operation does not preserve the uniqueness
property which $MR_REPO had, and that's why I say that we need an
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Joey Hess j...@kitenet.net wrote:
Adam Spiers wrote:
However, the basename operation does not preserve the uniqueness
property which $MR_REPO had, and that's why I say that we need an
additional namespace.
So pick an operation that does? tr / _ would do, for
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Joey Hess j...@kitenet.net wrote:
Having two namespaces for the same thing does not strike me as
necessarily a good idea.
But if you wanted to do that with mr, you could
maybe take advantage of a little-known thing it does with determining the
absolute path:
Adam Spiers wrote:
I already did this; in fact I *had* to, in order to support GNU stow,
which requires the stow package namespace to be the list of
directories under a single stow directory. If you look for
$STOW_PKG_PATH in the code I originally posted, you'll see:
Hi all,
I've been tracking my dot files and related stuff since around 1999,
and was very excited to discover this mailing list two years ago.
Since then I've only been able to lurk, but finally have a bit of
spare time to participate.
Since 2005 I have been using my own (as yet unpublished)
Sorry that I go slightly off-topic but you mentioned Gnu Stow, I looked it up
and it seems very nice.
i haven't run it yet, but (for those who don't want to read the long
description) from the description it seems like a simple and elegant tool,
which you give a directory (i want symlinks here)
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Dieter Plaetinck die...@plaetinck.be wrote:
Sorry that I go slightly off-topic but you mentioned Gnu Stow, I looked it up
and it seems very nice.
i haven't run it yet, but (for those who don't want to read the long
description) from the description it seems
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 14:34:16 +0100
Adam Spiers vcs-h...@adamspiers.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Dieter Plaetinck
die...@plaetinck.be wrote:
Sorry that I go slightly off-topic but you mentioned Gnu Stow, I
looked it up and it seems very nice. i haven't run it yet, but (for
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Dieter Plaetinck die...@plaetinck.be wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 14:34:16 +0100
Adam Spiers vcs-h...@adamspiers.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Dieter Plaetinck
die...@plaetinck.be wrote:
Sorry that I go slightly off-topic but you mentioned Gnu
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Dieter Plaetinck die...@plaetinck.be wrote:
You wrote However I might very well want to manually place other
files inside ~/local which have nothing to do with stow.
Now you wrote As far as I'm aware, all my files are nicely
separated into appropriate
mumble..
[1] https://github.com/RichiH/vcsh
___
vcs-home mailing list
vcs-home@lists.madduck.net
http://lists.madduck.net/listinfo/vcs-home
Adam Spiers wrote:
So far mr is clearly winning :-) However, cfgctl does have one or two
tricks up its sleeve:
- Config modules / packages / repositories / whatever you want to
call them are indexed by name within a unique namespace, rather
than by directory path, and packages
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 18:23, Adam Spiers vcs-h...@adamspiers.org wrote:
Ah thanks, I did wonder about that.
Yah, I hope the old version will drop off of google at some point to
avoid confusion.
Sure, there's no right and wrong. It sounds like your preference is
based on a sense of
13 matches
Mail list logo
