Revision: 566
http://sourceforge.net/p/vde/svn/566
Author: rd235
Date: 2014-01-10 15:05:41 + (Fri, 10 Jan 2014)
Log Message:
---
Wirefilter: -N was missing in getopt's optstring
Modified Paths:
--
branches/rd235/vde-2/src/wirefilter.c
Modified: branches
Revision: 565
http://sourceforge.net/p/vde/svn/565
Author: rd235
Date: 2014-01-10 15:04:08 + (Fri, 10 Jan 2014)
Log Message:
---
wirefilter -N missing in getopt's optstring
Modified Paths:
--
trunk/vde-2/src/wirefilter.c
Modified: trunk/vde-2/src/wirefi
The bug is in the code.
The feature is working provided the extended option is used
--nofifo
instead of -N.
I forgot to add an N in getopt's optstring.
I'll fix the bug asap. Please use the long option workaround in the meanwhile.
renzo davoli
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:27:44AM +0100,
Good morning,
the wirefilter's man page and the help report the -N switch but it is
not handled in the code. Where is the bug in the man page or in the
code?
PS. Please CC to me because I'm not subscribed to the list.
Marco
---
Hello, I'm using wirefilter programmatically and I incurred an undesired
behavior: some times the commands are not send one after the other but
are chained together and then they are sent but wirefilter is not able
to handle this situation.
ex:
bandwidth LR 12\n
bandwidth RL 1