Re: [vdr] Xineliboutput: can achieve similar to softdevice's mgatv option?

2007-04-21 Thread Torgeir Veimo
On 20 Apr 2007, at 19:21, Alasdair Campbell wrote: I'll have a look at the softdevice src this weekend & compare with xineliboutput. Why aren't you just using softdevice? -- Torgeir Veimo [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org

Re: [vdr] [PATCH] re-use devices in transfer mode

2007-04-21 Thread Udo Richter
Anssi Hannula wrote: However, the usual "use-already-tuned-devices" check in GetDevice() only checks for device->Receiving(), which does not report transfer-moded device, resulting in the new receiver being started on second device, thus both devices being reserved for receiving data from the sam

Re: [vdr] Xineliboutput: can achieve similar to softdevice's mgatv option?

2007-04-21 Thread Torgeir Veimo
On 21 Apr 2007, at 11:37, Torgeir Veimo wrote: On 20 Apr 2007, at 19:21, Alasdair Campbell wrote: I'll have a look at the softdevice src this weekend & compare with xineliboutput. Why aren't you just using softdevice? Ignore my question, I hadn't read the full thread.. Saturday morning

Re: [vdr] [PATCH] re-use devices in transfer mode

2007-04-21 Thread Stone
Anssi Hannula wrote: > However, the usual "use-already-tuned-devices" check in GetDevice() only > checks for device->Receiving(), which does not report transfer-moded > device, resulting in the new receiver being started on second device, > thus both devices being reserved for receiving data from

Re: [vdr] Xineliboutput: can achieve similar to softdevice's mgatv option?

2007-04-21 Thread Alasdair Campbell
On 21/04/07, Tony Houghton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alasdair Campbell wrote: > Because I'm using a 550Mhz P3, my only option is to use the > xineliboutput until I figure out what is causing the big CPU load > variations. As I've never had softdevice successfully running

Re: [vdr] Xineliboutput: can achieve similar to softdevice's mgatv option?

2007-04-21 Thread Alasdair Campbell
On 21/04/07, Petri Hintukainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 19:21 +0100, Alasdair Campbell wrote: > > I'll have a look at the softdevice src this weekend & compare with > xineliboutput. Better to compare with xine-lib (src/video_out/video_out_directfb.c), as there's not even

Re: [vdr] [PATCH] re-use devices in transfer mode

2007-04-21 Thread Anssi Hannula
Udo Richter wrote: > Anssi Hannula wrote: >> However, the usual "use-already-tuned-devices" check in GetDevice() only >> checks for device->Receiving(), which does not report transfer-moded >> device, resulting in the new receiver being started on second device, >> thus both devices being reserved

Re: [vdr] [PATCH] re-use devices in transfer mode

2007-04-21 Thread Anssi Hannula
Stone wrote: > > Anssi Hannula wrote: > > However, the usual "use-already-tuned-devices" check in > GetDevice() only > > checks for device->Receiving(), which does not report transfer-moded > > device, resulting in the new receiver being started on second device, > > thus b

Re: [vdr] Xineliboutput: can achieve similar to softdevice's mgatv option?

2007-04-21 Thread Tony Houghton
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alasdair Campbell wrote: > On 21/04/07, Tony Houghton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >Another alternative is to use the other vdr xine plugin with df_xine, > >which gives very good results with my Matrox (G450). About the only > >problem is that it sometimes doesn't scale

Re: [vdr] Xineliboutput: can achieve similar to softdevice's mgatv option?

2007-04-21 Thread Markus Schuster
On Saturday 21 April 2007 07:56:52 Petri Hintukainen wrote: > On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 03:27 +0200, Markus Schuster wrote: > > With Bloomberg (German news/stock channel) I see a very odd behavior: > > [..] > > Probably channel uses smaller resolution than VDR OSD (720x576). Yes, it does indeed :)