Re: [vdr] New shutdown procedure not working as expected

2007-08-09 Thread Udo Richter
Petri Helin wrote: > Udo Richter wrote: >> In any case, try dumping the return value to syslog, I would really like >> to know what additional flag is set on the return value. >> > > I got 6, 9 and 11 when I did some debugging earlier. I *think* that these are kill signals received by the child

Re: [vdr] New shutdown procedure not working as expected

2007-08-09 Thread Petri Helin
Udo Richter wrote: > Petri Helin wrote: >> Udo Richter wrote: >>> In any case, try dumping the return value to syslog, I would really like >>> to know what additional flag is set on the return value. >>> >> I got 6, 9 and 11 when I did some debugging earlier. > > I *think* that these are kill sig

Re: [vdr] New shutdown procedure not working as expected

2007-08-09 Thread Udo Richter
Petri Helin wrote: > Udo Richter wrote: >> I *think* that these are kill signals received by the child process. >> Which is strange, as the child does an exit immediately. (Unless you're >> somewhere between 1.5.1 and 1.5.3 - this changed in 1.5.4) >> >> 6 is SIGABRT, 11 is SIGSEGV and 9 is SIGKI

Re: [vdr] New shutdown procedure not working as expected

2007-08-09 Thread Stone
On 8/9/07, Udo Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Petri Helin wrote: > > Udo Richter wrote: > >> I *think* that these are kill signals received by the child process. > >> Which is strange, as the child does an exit immediately. (Unless you're > >> somewhere between 1.5.1 and 1.5.3 - this change

Re: [vdr] WSS signaling with DXR3 cards

2007-08-09 Thread Kartsa
Ville Skyttä kirjoitti: > On Sunday 05 August 2007, Kartsa wrote: > > >> At first I had >> problems with getting DXR card to work with fedora core 7 but now >> everything is otherwise fine but wss signaling does not seem to work. Do >> I need to patch the kernel or em8300 or something to make it