Re: [vdr] BUG: DVB-T and DVB-S[2] do not work with VDR & multiproto

2008-01-12 Thread Reinhard Nissl
Hi, Stefan Lucke schrieb: >>> Same here. >>> Which DVB-T device do you use ? I'm using a cinergyT2. >>> >>> Ioctl's for this device are not passed >>> via the common frontend interface. The new "API" has to get >>> integrated into the cinergyT2 driver or client programs like vdr etc. >>> have to

Re: [vdr] BUG: DVB-T and DVB-S[2] do not work with VDR & multiproto [Was: Two VDR's on one machine]

2008-01-12 Thread Stefan Lucke
On Saturday 12 January 2008, Morfsta wrote: > On Jan 12, 2008 3:37 PM, Stefan Lucke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Same here. > > Which DVB-T device do you use ? I'm using a cinergyT2. > > > > Ioctl's for this device are not passed > > via the common frontend interface. The new "API" has to get > >

Re: [vdr] BUG: DVB-T and DVB-S[2] do not work with VDR & multiproto [Was: Two VDR's on one machine]

2008-01-12 Thread Morfsta
On Jan 12, 2008 3:37 PM, Stefan Lucke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Same here. > Which DVB-T device do you use ? I'm using a cinergyT2. > > Ioctl's for this device are not passed > via the common frontend interface. The new "API" has to get > integrated into the cinergyT2 driver or client programs l

Re: [vdr] BUG: DVB-T and DVB-S[2] do not work with VDR & multiproto [Was: Two VDR's on one machine]

2008-01-12 Thread Stefan Lucke
On Saturday 12 January 2008, Morfsta wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for speaking with Marco, Reinhard - its appreciated. > > Unfortunately, the patch does not fix the problem. Still no picture on > DVB-T transmissions. Same here. Which DVB-T device do you use ? I'm using a cinergyT2. Ioctl's for this

Re: [vdr] BUG: DVB-T and DVB-S[2] do not work with VDR & multiproto [Was: Two VDR's on one machine]

2008-01-12 Thread Morfsta
Hi, Thanks for speaking with Marco, Reinhard - its appreciated. Unfortunately, the patch does not fix the problem. Still no picture on DVB-T transmissions. Regards On Jan 11, 2008 7:21 PM, Reinhard Nissl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Reinhard Nissl schrieb: > > > So it seems to me that e

[vdr] [ANNOUNCE] Hard link cutter patch 0.2.0

2008-01-12 Thread Udo Richter
Hi list, I've improved the hard link cutter patch. The new 0.2.0 version has support for multiple /videoXX folders. The new patch tries to find a compatible /videoXX folder that can hold a hard link for each file. Deep mounted video folders (like mount to /video/nfs-server/ or /video/usb-disk

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] improved LIRC remote for VDR-1.5.12

2008-01-12 Thread Ville Skyttä
On Saturday 12 January 2008, Reinhard Nissl wrote: > Ville Skyttä schrieb: > > > Also, somewhat off topic: when running powertop[1] on my VDR box, I see > > lircd waking up the CPU from idle about 1000 times a second while VDR is > > connected to it: > > > > Top causes for wakeups: > > 54.3% (988

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] improved LIRC remote for VDR-1.5.12

2008-01-12 Thread Reinhard Nissl
Hi, Ville Skyttä schrieb: >> I think, the LIRC protocol misses a timestamp for each button >> press. Or an even more favorable solution would be to put the >> timeout and frequency processing into LIRC and have VDR to >> process each key as it arrives, just like with the KBD remote. > > Would us

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] improved LIRC remote for VDR-1.5.12

2008-01-12 Thread Ville Skyttä
On Saturday 12 January 2008, Reinhard Nissl wrote: > I think, the LIRC protocol misses a timestamp for each button > press. Or an even more favorable solution would be to put the > timeout and frequency processing into LIRC and have VDR to > process each key as it arrives, just like with the KBD r

[vdr] contact to femon plugin developer

2008-01-12 Thread Sebastian Dellit
Hello vdr readers, is there a possibility to contact the femon-plugin developer? I want to give any feature request for make the femon plugin accessible for braille users. -- Best regards Sebastian ICQ: 264706583 | MSM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Skype: sebo_de | Yahoo: de_sebo E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED