Re: [vdr] Defunct screensaver processes under Xine

2008-04-15 Thread Morfsta
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Todd Luliak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'd be happy if the screensaver never ran again, as it's of no use here > whatsoever. > Where do I begin looking to curb the creation of these zombies? > Do you need to run gnome at all? Its quite processor intensive if

Re: [vdr] Multiple decryption with TechniCrypt CW CAM

2008-04-15 Thread Arthur Konovalov
Klaus Schmidinger wrote: Does the log really end at that point? If there is no "Ca Pmt Reply" then the CAM doesn't reply to the query. That is, no reply in this point. Because I got second confirmation from TechniSat Support about multiple decryption possibility, I made small test changes in

Re: [vdr] xineliboutput audio lip sync problems

2008-04-15 Thread Theunis Potgieter
Well it looks like I'm the only Gentoo user here that is experiencing this problem. I noticed a bit more on when it occurs. I've current changed my vdr process to run at -19 priority to see if it makes any difference. Livetv is some how now correct. But I still experience problems with recordings

Re: [vdr] Defunct screensaver processes under Xine

2008-04-15 Thread Todd Luliak
>Do you need to run gnome at all? Its quite processor intensive if all >you are doing is using it to watch TV. See the other recent thread on >starting VDR/xine at boot time using startx / replacing the session >manager and those problems with gnome screensaver won't be apparent. > >Also, there is

Re: [vdr] xineliboutput audio lip sync problems

2008-04-15 Thread Stefan Lucke
On Tuesday 15 April 2008, Theunis Potgieter wrote: > Well it looks like I'm the only Gentoo user here that is experiencing this > problem. > > I noticed a bit more on when it occurs. I've current changed my vdr process > to run at -19 priority to see if it makes any difference. Livetv is some how

Re: [vdr] Multiple decryption with TechniCrypt CW CAM

2008-04-15 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 04/15/08 14:33, Arthur Konovalov wrote: > Klaus Schmidinger wrote: >> Does the log really end at that point? >> >> If there is no "Ca Pmt Reply" then the CAM doesn't reply to >> the query. > > That is, no reply in this point. > Because I got second confirmation from TechniSat Support about mult

Re: [vdr] Multiple decryption with TechniCrypt CW CAM

2008-04-15 Thread Arthur Konovalov
Klaus Schmidinger wrote: > Can you narrow down which of these three changes is actually necessary > to make it work? I can repeat tests tomorrow, but I recall that this (it was first change): >state = 4; // normal operation > + repliesToQuery = true; //AK >} and this (next cha

Re: [vdr] Defunct screensaver processes under Xine

2008-04-15 Thread Morfsta
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Todd Luliak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, I don't "need" Gnome and am looking into alternatives per your > suggestion. I hate the idea of having to run a display manager at all, but > the picture looks too good to back out now. ;) > You don't need a display man

Re: [vdr] Defunct screensaver processes under Xine

2008-04-15 Thread Todd Luliak
>...provide some more lines from above it. It looks like it bombs right about here: (hope it's enough...) in: make -C ffmpeg/libavcodec libavcodec.a ... In file included from i386/dsputil_mmx.c:30: i386/mmx.h:24:2: warning: #warning Everything in this header is deprecated, use plain asm()! New

[vdr] Rotor patches

2008-04-15 Thread Timothy D. Lenz
There are 2 patches for the Rotor plugin: vdr-1.5.5-rotor.diff Rotor-0.1.4-vdr1.5.10.diff They patch different areas. Are they both needed for vdr-1.6? ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr

[vdr] Rotor patches

2008-04-15 Thread lucian orasanu
Hy. No, just Rotor-0.1.4-vdr1.5.10.diff. Lucian. Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ __