On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 22:34:17 +0100
Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> > I think the option is clearly defined now.
> > I little thing that always annoyed me was that every recoding file had
> > the .vdr extension, whatever the actual contents (it seemed like the
> > file name was used as an extension).
On 04.01.2009 22:34, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> On 04.01.2009 19:21, Nicolas Huillard wrote:
> > Klaus Schmidinger a écrit :
> >> Up to now VDR has used names like 001.vdr for its recording files.
> >> While moving to Transport Stream as the recording format, I need to
> >> use a different file nam
Klaus Schmidinger a écrit :
> On 04.01.2009 19:21, Nicolas Huillard wrote:
>> file name was used as an extension). See:
>> index.vdr
>> info.vdr
>> marks.vdr
>> resume.vdr
>>
>> Maybe you will find an opportunity to improve this at the same time...
>
> Well, how about leaving t
On 04.01.2009 19:21, Nicolas Huillard wrote:
> Klaus Schmidinger a écrit :
>> Up to now VDR has used names like 001.vdr for its recording files.
>> While moving to Transport Stream as the recording format, I need to
>> use a different file name extension, and so was wondering which one
>> to use. M
Nicolas,
You right. For example I'm keen of LinuxMCE (www.linuxmce.org) and it
has a script that looking for media files, thus all .vdr are recognised
as a video files of VDR while is not. It would would be a very wise step
to improve this at the same time...
On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 19:21 +0100, Ni
Klaus Schmidinger a écrit :
> Up to now VDR has used names like 001.vdr for its recording files.
> While moving to Transport Stream as the recording format, I need to
> use a different file name extension, and so was wondering which one
> to use. My first idea was *.ts, for "Transport Stream", but
Hello!
A new version of the VDR Teletext Subtitles plug-in was just released.
Development site:
http://projects.vdr-developer.org/projects/show/plg-ttxtsubs
Downloads:
http://projects.vdr-developer.org/projects/list_files/plg-ttxtsubs
Git-Web:
http://projects.vdr-developer.org/git/?p=vdr
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Diego Pierotto wrote:
> Klaus Schmidinger ha scritto:
>> Up to now VDR has used names like 001.vdr for its recording files.
>> While moving to Transport Stream as the recording format, I need to
>> use a different file name extension, and so was wondering which one
Klaus Schmidinger ha scritto:
> Up to now VDR has used names like 001.vdr for its recording files.
> While moving to Transport Stream as the recording format, I need to
> use a different file name extension, and so was wondering which one
> to use. My first idea was *.ts, for "Transport Stream", bu
Just to add 1 more opinion...
Over 6 years i'm working with transport stream files and ALWAYS it
was .ts because most of proprietary applications do not handle it
correctly with any other extensions. There are DVD/VideoCD created by
proprietary DVB Live TV recording that use transport stream file
> I am strongly against this.
> *.ts may conflict with KDE, but it is a usual ending for transport stream.
> Several mpeg-tools can handle this. I think the dreambox is also using *.ts
> for its recordings.
>
I agree - .ts is the way to go if it a straight dump of the Transport Stream...
> From: Klaus Schmidinger
> Up to now VDR has used names like 001.vdr for its recording files.
> While moving to Transport Stream as the recording format, I need to
> use a different file name extension, and so was wondering which one
> to use. My first idea was *.ts, for "Transport Stream", but
On 04.01.2009 13:22, Hendrik Müller wrote:
> I also vote for '.ts' :-) '.mpg' is definitely the wrong extension for that.
Ok, thanks for everybody's input.
So *.ts it is.
Klaus
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman
I also vote for '.ts' :-) '.mpg' is definitely the wrong extension for that.
Thanks
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: vdr-boun...@linuxtv.org [mailto:vdr-boun...@linuxtv.org] Im Auftrag von
Pertti Kosunen
Gesendet: Sonntag, 4. Januar 2009 12:20
An: VDR Mailing List
Betreff: Re: [vdr] W
On 04.01.2009 11:55, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> Up to now VDR has used names like 001.vdr for its recording files.
> While moving to Transport Stream as the recording format, I need to
> use a different file name extension, and so was wondering which one
> to use. My first idea was *.ts, for "Trans
Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> What do you think about this?
I vote for .ts, it's widely used on different programs and hardware
media players.
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
Hello,
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 11:55:07AM +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> Up to now VDR has used names like 001.vdr for its recording files.
> While moving to Transport Stream as the recording format, I need to
> use a different file name extension, and so was wondering which one
> to use. My fi
On 4 Jan 2009, at 20:55, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> What do you think about this?
> Is *.mpg also appropriate for h.264 encoded files?
Surely the move to native h.264 and dvb-s2 support and transport
stream recording would ultimately call for incrementing the major
revision number of vdr, s
Up to now VDR has used names like 001.vdr for its recording files.
While moving to Transport Stream as the recording format, I need to
use a different file name extension, and so was wondering which one
to use. My first idea was *.ts, for "Transport Stream", but when I
point, for instance, Konquero
19 matches
Mail list logo
