[vdr] Hulu for Linux

2009-10-10 Thread Timothy D. Lenz
Hulu now has a linux interface. And it seems MythTv can use it. what about vdr? Can it be done without installing a desktop? http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=139868 ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org

[vdr] Problems compiling xine-lib-1.2 for vdr-xine

2009-10-10 Thread Simon Baxter
Hi I'm getting a bunch of errors trying to compile xine-lib-1.2 for vdr-xine. First up, I had to disable musepack support - because I could find no source containing musepack.h. There is no libmusepack for Fedora, it's contained in libmpcdec but libmpcdec-devel does not have musepack.h.

Re: [vdr] Problems compiling xine-lib-1.2 for vdr-xine

2009-10-10 Thread Petri Helin
Simon Baxter wrote: I'm using ffmpeg svn revision 29766 Any ideas? You must have picked up that revision number from a wrong place, since the current revision is 20199. libavcodec/avcodec.h is the file where you should look for the missing member definition. Also make sure that the

Re: [vdr] Problems compiling xine-lib-1.2 for vdr-xine

2009-10-10 Thread Simon Baxter
Simon Baxter wrote: I'm using ffmpeg svn revision 29766 Any ideas? You must have picked up that revision number from a wrong place, since the current revision is 20199. libavcodec/avcodec.h is the file where you should look for the missing member definition. Also make sure that the

Re: [vdr] Problems compiling xine-lib-1.2 for vdr-xine

2009-10-10 Thread Petri Helin
Simon Baxter wrote: Simon Baxter wrote: I'm using ffmpeg svn revision 29766 Any ideas? You must have picked up that revision number from a wrong place, since the current revision is 20199. libavcodec/avcodec.h is the file where you should look for the missing member definition. Also

Re: [vdr] Problems compiling xine-lib-1.2 for vdr-xine

2009-10-10 Thread Simon Baxter
You must have picked up that revision number from a wrong place, since the current revision is 20199. libavcodec/avcodec.h is the file where you should look for the missing member definition. Also make sure that the headers for that revision are the only ones installed. Most likely you are not