Re: [vdr] RFE: Make VDR more friendly when using combinations of DVB-S, DVB-T and DVB-C

2012-06-18 Thread Marx
I like the idea of external channels database. There is well known kingofsat site which is always up-to-date and inspite of scanning it could be easier to simply import channels definition from it. It for example could allow to import only channels from selected provider. I imagine it could be

Re: [vdr] RFE: Make VDR more friendly when using combinations of DVB-S, DVB-T and DVB-C

2012-06-18 Thread Marx
What do you think about moving collision detection module into plugin? That way it could be easily swapped. I'm sure many people have their preferences different in how such module should work Marx ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org

Re: [vdr] RFE: Make VDR more friendly when using combinations of DVB-S, DVB-T and DVB-C

2012-06-18 Thread VDR User
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 11:50 PM, Marx acc.for.n...@gmail.com wrote: I like the idea of external channels database. There is well known kingofsat site which is always up-to-date and inspite of scanning  it could be easier to simply import channels definition from it. It for example could allow

Re: [vdr] RFE: Make VDR more friendly when using combinations of DVB-S, DVB-T and DVB-C

2012-06-18 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 18.06.2012 08:37, Marx wrote: What do you think about moving collision detection module into plugin? That way it could be easily swapped. I'm sure many people have their preferences different in how such module should work There is no collision detection in core VDR yet, so there's

Re: [vdr] RFE: Make VDR more friendly when using combinations of DVB-S, DVB-T and DVB-C

2012-06-18 Thread mtron
On 06/17/2012 02:16 PM, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: Concerning whether to use the longer or the shorter version of the name+source, I would choose the shorter version to not increase chances of the new name not fitting in the OSD. Thus: ZDF (S) ZDF (T) ZDF (C) After sleeping

Re: [vdr] RFE: Make VDR more friendly when using combinations of DVB-S, DVB-T and DVB-C

2012-06-18 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 18.06.2012 11:27, mtron wrote: On 06/17/2012 02:16 PM, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: Concerning whether to use the longer or the shorter version of the name+source, I would choose the shorter version to not increase chances of the new name not fitting in the OSD. Thus: ZDF (S) ZDF

[vdr] Collecting semantic channel meta data in a way to be useful for VDR

2012-06-18 Thread Henning Pingel
Hi, I posted in the discussion RFE: Make VDR more friendly when using combinations of DVB-S, DVB-T and DVB-C yesterday and mentioned that my little project Channelpedia could be helpful in this regard. But because my approach is more targeting the necessary semantic meta data that would be

Re: [vdr] RFE: Make VDR more friendly when using combinations of DVB-S, DVB-T and DVB-C

2012-06-18 Thread Ludi
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 16:55:10 +0200 Klaus Schmidinger klaus.schmidin...@tvdr.de wrote: On 17.06.2012 16:50, Ludi wrote: Could you please tell us whether the patch is compatible to vdr 1.7.27? It is the version that is currently in use in the development version of yavdr. It should apply

Re: [vdr] Collecting semantic channel meta data in a way to be useful for VDR

2012-06-18 Thread Davide Chiarini
For Channel ids, have a look at the rfc used by the xmltv grabbers, you can find a copy on http://wiki.xmltv.org/index.php/XMLTVProject Regards Davide Il giorno 18/giu/2012 14:53, Henning Pingel henn...@henningpingel.de ha To store all this metadata for a channel, the channel needs a unique

Re: [vdr] Collecting semantic channel meta data in a way to be useful for VDR

2012-06-18 Thread Henning Pingel
Am Montag, den 18.06.2012, 18:11 +0200 schrieb Davide Chiarini davide.chiar...@gmail.com: For Channel ids, have a look at the rfc used by the xmltv grabbers, you can find a copy on http://wiki.xmltv.org/index.php/XMLTVProject Regards Davide I have tried to stay close to rfc2838: