Hi,
today I've read an interesting article about ext4:
http://www.heise.de/open/Das-Linux-Dateisystem-Ext4--/artikel/138431 (german,
but there is also an english version). The new file system seems to be better
for large files, as VDR-recordings are. Files up to 512 MB can be saved with
just 1
Why not use the XFS filesystem? Proven high performance with large
files, perfect for an htpc.
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
Am Sonntag 07 Juni 2009 schrieb VDR User:
> Why not use the XFS filesystem? Proven high performance with large
> files, perfect for an htpc.
He asked for ext4, not for suggestions for filesystems.
Thomas Schäfer
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
ht
Marcel Witte wrote:
> So ext4 seems to be perfect for a video-partition, but to make it more
> perfect, it would be nice if VDR could use the fallocate()-systemcall as
> mentioned in the article. This would prevent fragmentation in the file system.
a) i wouldn't fully trust ext4 for a few more
On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 19:11:53 -0700
VDR User wrote:
> Why not use the XFS filesystem? Proven high performance with large
> files, perfect for an htpc.
That's what I thought, but I regret using it for my recordings partition
now:
* The big performance advantage in deleting large files seems to
On 07.06.2009 01:58, Marcel Witte wrote:
> So ext4 seems to be perfect for a video-partition, but to make it more
> perfect, it would be nice if VDR could use the fallocate()-systemcall as
> mentioned in the article. This would prevent fragmentation in the file system.
Sounds like a good plan, but
On 07.06.2009 01:58, Marcel Witte wrote:
> So ext4 seems to be perfect for a video-partition, but to make it more
> perfect, it would be nice if VDR could use the fallocate()-systemcall as
> mentioned in the article. This would prevent fragmentation in the file system.
Sounds like a good plan, but
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Thomas Schäfer wrote:
> Am Sonntag 07 Juni 2009 schrieb VDR User:
>> Why not use the XFS filesystem? Proven high performance with large
>> files, perfect for an htpc.
>
> He asked for ext4, not for suggestions for filesystems.
If you look closely you'll notice a q
>> On 07.06.2009 01:58, Marcel Witte wrote:
>> So ext4 seems to be perfect for a video-partition, but to make it more
>> perfect, it would be nice if VDR could use the fallocate()-systemcall
>> as mentioned in the article. This would prevent fragmentation in the file
system.
> Udo wrote:
>Sounds
jori.hamalai...@teliasonera.com schrieb am Montag 08 Juni 2009:
> >> On 07.06.2009 01:58, Marcel Witte wrote:
> >> So ext4 seems to be perfect for a video-partition, but to make it more
> >> perfect, it would be nice if VDR could use the fallocate()-systemcall
> >> as mentioned in the article. This
On 06/09/09 00:47, Marcel Witte wrote:
> jori.hamalai...@teliasonera.com schrieb am Montag 08 Juni 2009:
On 07.06.2009 01:58, Marcel Witte wrote:
So ext4 seems to be perfect for a video-partition, but to make it more
perfect, it would be nice if VDR could use the fallocate()-systemca
11 matches
Mail list logo