I demand that Ian Bates may or may not have written...
[snip]
> In the mean time I am looking at the patch Darren Salt brought to my
> attention for xine-lib, and the xine post plugin 'expand' (with special
> attention to Reinhard Nissl's center_cut/crop_out mode') to see if I can
> hack something
Hi,
Ian Bates schrieb:
> Thanks to everyone for their help and suggestions. More welcome too.
In vdr-xine's setup menu, you can specify scaling factors for
16:9 and 4:3 images. Scaling 16:9 images by 133 % will fit it
into a 4:3 window (e. g. full screen), dropping information on
the left an
Torgeir Veimo wrote:
>> So (finally) a direct question: how do people with 4:3 output devices
>> and vdr with xineliboutput configure their boxes?
>
> (shameless plug) Did you actually try softdevice?
Dear Torgeir,
Nothing shameless about the plug! Yes, I have tried softdevice (recent
CVS and
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 13:43 +0300, Petri Helin wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Jouni Karvo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Nevertheless, although probably most techies feel the crop mode is not
> > interesting, perhaps you'll be able to find one that is willing to
> > implement it - o
> So (finally) a direct question: how do people with 4:3 output devices
> and vdr with xineliboutput configure their boxes?
(shameless plug) Did you actually try softdevice?
--
Torgeir Veimo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
ht
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Jouni Karvo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nevertheless, although probably most techies feel the crop mode is not
> interesting, perhaps you'll be able to find one that is willing to
> implement it - or perhaps you can DIY and share the code.
>
I think the idea of
Ian Bates wrote:
> One more remark, if as I believe from the comments in the code above,
> that the '16:9 crop to 4:3' behaviour is not implemented in
> xineliboutput, am I the only one suffering from the lack of this
> feature? Am I the only one still using a 4:3 TV? I don't think so,
> what
Patrick Boettcher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, Ian Bates wrote:
>> One more remark, if as I believe from the comments in the code above,
>> that the '16:9 crop to 4:3' behaviour is not implemented in
>> xineliboutput, am I the only one suffering from the lack of this
>> feature? Am I the
I demand that Ian Bates may or may not have written...
> I have lurked a while on this list but until now have not had reason to
> post.
> I am unable to configure xineliboutput to my liking.
[snip]
> My output device is a 4:3 analog TV. Watching a 4:3 stream is fine in the
> sense that the ful
Hi,
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, Ian Bates wrote:
> One more remark, if as I believe from the comments in the code above,
> that the '16:9 crop to 4:3' behaviour is not implemented in
> xineliboutput, am I the only one suffering from the lack of this
> feature? Am I the only one still using a 4:3 TV? I d
Thank you Torgeir for you response. Now I know the correct terminology!
Back to general comments.
I have had a look at the xineliboutput source code, and it appears that
'centercutout' and 'pan&scan', features which I think are the ones I
want, are at best work in progress:
xine_frontend.c: a
On 8 Apr 2008, at 16:43, Ian Bates wrote:
> What I would like is to maintain the stream 16:9 ratio but by by
> cropping the left and right sections of the stream that fall 'outside'
> the TV, so the full real estate of the TV is used, at the expense of
> losing some stream information.
This setti
Dear all,
I have lurked a while on this list but until now have not had reason to
post.
I am unable to configure xineliboutput to my liking. I don't imagine I
am the only one with this issue, but I have not been able to find a
solution, either by trial and error or by googling. I would appre
13 matches
Mail list logo
