- Original Message -
> From: "Itamar Heim"
> To: "Saggi Mizrahi"
> Cc: "Adam Litke" , vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
> Sent: Monday, July 9, 2012 11:03:43 AM
> Subject: Re: [vdsm] [RFC] An alternative way to provide a supported interface
> -- libvdsm
>
> On 07/09/2012 05:56 PM, Sag
On 07/09/2012 05:56 PM, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
I don't think AMQP is a good low level supported protocol as it's a very
complex protocol to set up and support.
Also brokers are known to have their differences in standard implementation
which means supporting them all is a mess.
It looks like the
I don't think AMQP is a good low level supported protocol as it's a very
complex protocol to set up and support.
Also brokers are known to have their differences in standard implementation
which means supporting them all is a mess.
It looks like the most accepted route is the libvirt route of ha
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 03:53:08PM +0300, Itamar Heim wrote:
> On 07/06/2012 01:15 AM, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
> >On 07/05/2012 04:45 PM, Adam Litke wrote:
> >>On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 03:47:42PM -0400, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
> >>>
> >>>- Original Message -
> From: "Adam Litke"
> T
