On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 05:08:59PM +0100, Peter V. Saveliev wrote:
> …
>
> Hello all.
>
> I'm working on improving libvirt usage in VDSM. Rationale is that
> libvirt driver has global lock, that holds us in any operation on
> many VMs simultaneously. Several small patches are prepared, so I'm
> s
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 04:07:30PM +0200, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Nowadays, when vdsm receives the setupNetowrk verb, it mangles
> /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-* files and restarts the network
> service, so they are read by the responsible SysV service.
>
> This is very much Fedor
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 12:59:21AM +0200, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 10:35:23PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 11:25:19PM +0200, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 06:58:09PM +0800, huntxu wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 11:25:19PM +0200, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 06:58:09PM +0800, huntxu wrote:
> > Hi, folks.
> >
> > Recently I am considering to implement ipv6 support for vdsm. First
> > of all I
> > would like to know whether there is already someone working on this
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 07:45:25AM -0500, Ryan Harper wrote:
> * Dan Yasny [2012-10-15 23:42]:
> >
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> >
> > > > Why? It really sounds like an easy path to me - provisioning of a
> > > > virtual appliance is supposed to be simple, upgrades not necessary
> > > > -
> > > > same as wi
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 03:21:23PM +0200, David Jaša wrote:
> Adam Litke píše v Po 15. 10. 2012 v 08:07 -0500:
> > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 04:40:00AM -0400, Dan Yasny wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > > From: "Adam Litke"
> > > > To: "Zhou Zheng Sheng"
> > > > Cc: "VDS
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 05:19:46PM -0400, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
> Hi, in the API a lot of IDs get passed around are UUIDs.
> The point is that as long as you are not the entity generating the UUIDs the
> fact that these are UUIDs have no real significance to you.
> I suggest removing the validation
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 07:17:44AM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
> Adding danpb and DV to get some perspective from libvirt...
>
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 05:02:59PM -0400, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I am not sure I am ready to conceed that XML-RPC is too slow for our
> > > needs. Can
> >
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 05:37:26PM +0300, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 04:19:28PM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
> > 1) Completely define the current XMLRPC API including all functions,
> > parameters,
> > and return values. Complex data structures can be broken down into their
> >
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 03:14:15PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/18/2012 10:02 AM, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
> >I would like to put on to the table for descussion the growing need for a way
> >to more easily reuse of the functionality of VDSM in order to service
> >projects
> >other than Ovirt-
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:33:15AM -0400, Federico Simoncelli wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Daniel P. Berrange"
> > To: "Federico Simoncelli"
> > Cc: "Lei Li" , "Adam Litke" ,
> > "Dan Kenigsberg&qu
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:39:08AM -0400, Federico Simoncelli wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Lei Li"
> > To: vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
> > Cc: "Adam Litke" , "Dan Kenigsberg" ,
> > "Federico Simoncelli" ,
> > "Ryan Harper"
> > Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 11:18:03 AM
> >
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:45:13PM +0800, Shu Ming wrote:
> On 2012-5-16 23:35, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >>>>>>>[root@ovirt-node1 ~]# rpm -qa |grep vdsm
> >>>>>>>vdsm-cli-4.9.6-0.183.git107644d.fc16.shuming1336622293.noarch
> >>&g
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 06:08:51PM +0300, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:05:16PM +0800, Shu Ming wrote:
> > On 2012-5-16 18:46, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> > >On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 04:16:11PM +0800, Shu Ming wrote:
> > >>On 2012-5-14 7:30, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> > >>>On Sun, May
From: "Daniel P. Berrange"
Due to a bug in editing /etc/sysconfig/libvirtd, VDSM was causing
libvirt processes to run with the following command line args
/usr/sbin/libvirtd --listen '#' 'by vdsm'
While it correctly rejects any invalid option flags, libvirtd
wa
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:56:36AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 01:46:43PM +0300, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 04:16:11PM +0800, Shu Ming wrote:
> > I know that (see my text above). However, in F16 and before, comments have
&g
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 01:46:43PM +0300, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 04:16:11PM +0800, Shu Ming wrote:
> > On 2012-5-14 7:30, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> > >On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:51:48PM +0800, Shu Ming wrote:
> > >>Hi,
> > >> Recently, I found that my host in engine was alw
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 07:18:35PM -0500, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
> Good thing you linked to that wiki page. I learned a lot.
For sake of reference here's what the previous Fedora 16 test
day covered:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-09-15_Virtualization
I expect the Fedora 17 test da
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:08:19PM +0800, wangxiaofan wrote:
> Hi there,
> Why does not vdsm use snapshot APIs of libvirt, or "qemu-img snapshot -c"
> ?
The snapshot APIs are a fairly recent addition to libvirt, whose design was
in fact influenced strongly by VDSM's requirements. IIUC, the in
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:02:24AM +0200, Dor Laor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I read the design here and I like to make sure that the future road map
> will expand beyond the current scope.
>
> The current design totally rely on libvirt and does not parse the
> content of the PCI addressing. That's reall
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 09:44:19AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 11/30/2011 09:09 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
> > On 11/30/2011 05:00 PM, Adam Litke wrote:
> >>> single node and exposing the exact same REST API and behavior of the
> >>> multi-node ovirt engine would be easier to cosnume for someone
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:13:24PM +0200, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
> On 11/30/2011 11:41 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:54:44PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> >>* Adam Litke (a...@us.ibm.com) wrote:
> >>>On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:39:08AM -0800, Ch
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:54:44PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Adam Litke (a...@us.ibm.com) wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:39:08AM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> > > * Adam Litke (a...@us.ibm.com) wrote:
> > > >
> > > > https://github.com/aglitke/vdsm-rest/
> > > >
> > > > Today I am rele
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 09:14:16AM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote:
> On 11/29/2011 11:36 PM, Adam Litke wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:54:44PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> >> * Adam Litke (a...@us.ibm.com) wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:39:08AM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Adam Lit
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 01:11:18PM -0600, Adam Litke wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 05:44:23PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:18:42AM -0600, Adam Litke wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 04:50:19PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:18:42AM -0600, Adam Litke wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 04:50:19PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:29:41AM -0600, Adam Litke wrote:
> > > After discussing MOM / VDSM integration at length, two different
>
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:29:41AM -0600, Adam Litke wrote:
> After discussing MOM / VDSM integration at length, two different strategies
> have
> emerged. I will call them Plan A and Plan B:
>
> Plan A: MOM integration at the OS/Packaging level
> Plan B: MOM integration as a new VDSM thread
>
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 02:40:07PM +0200, Dor Laor wrote:
> On 11/17/2011 09:58 PM, Michael Roth wrote:
> >On 11/17/2011 10:34 AM, Barak Azulay wrote:
> >>On Thursday 17 November 2011 02:48:50 Michael Roth wrote:
> >>>I've tried to summarize the pros/cons, points, and proposals outlined in
> >>>thi
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 09:58:33AM -0600, Adam Litke wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 03:46:37AM -0500, Ayal Baron wrote:
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > > I have been following this thread pretty closely and the one sentence
> > > summary of the current argument is: ovirt-guest-agen
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 05:01:00PM -0600, Michael Roth wrote:
> On 11/15/2011 11:24 AM, Barak Azulay wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >One of the breakout sessions during the ovirt workshop [1] was about the
> >guest
> >tools, and focused mainly on the ovirt-guest-agent [2].
> >
> >One of the issues discussed
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:25:38PM +0200, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 04:39:55PM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Project_Proposal_-_MOM
> >
> > The link above will take you to the oVirt draft proposal for including
> > Memory
> > Overcom
31 matches
Mail list logo
