ovirt.org/6659
- Original Message -
> From: "Itamar Heim"
> To: "Adam Litke"
> Cc: "Saggi Mizrahi" , vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2012 9:39:16 AM
> Subject: Re: [vdsm] [RFC] An alternative way to provide a supp
"Adam Litke" , vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Sent: Monday, July 9, 2012 11:03:43 AM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] [RFC] An alternative way to provide a supported
interface -- libvdsm
On 07/09/2012 05:56 PM, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
I don't think AMQP is a good low level supported protocol as it&
t; >>>To: "Saggi Mizrahi"
> >>>Cc: "Adam Litke" , vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
> >>>Sent: Monday, July 9, 2012 11:03:43 AM
> >>>Subject: Re: [vdsm] [RFC] An alternative way to provide a supported
> >>>interface -- libvdsm
> >&
e: [vdsm] [RFC] An alternative way to provide a supported
interface -- libvdsm
On 07/09/2012 05:56 PM, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
I don't think AMQP is a good low level supported protocol as it's a
very complex protocol to set up and support.
Also brokers are known to have their difference
On 2012-7-10 2:52, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Itamar Heim"
To: "Saggi Mizrahi"
Cc: "Adam Litke" , vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Sent: Monday, July 9, 2012 11:03:43 AM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] [RFC] An alternative way to provide a s
On 07/09/2012 09:52 PM, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Itamar Heim"
To: "Saggi Mizrahi"
Cc: "Adam Litke" , vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Sent: Monday, July 9, 2012 11:03:43 AM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] [RFC] An alternative way to
Mizrahi wrote:
> >>>I'm sorry, but I don't really understand the drawing
> >>>
> >>>- Original Message -
> >>>>From: "Shu Ming"
> >>>>To: "Adam Litke"
> >>>>Cc: vdsm-devel@lists.fedora
ahi wrote:
I'm sorry, but I don't really understand the drawing
- Original Message -
From: "Shu Ming"
To: "Adam Litke"
Cc: vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 10:24:49 AM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] [RFC] An alternative way to provide a
Message -
> >>From: "Shu Ming"
> >>To: "Adam Litke"
> >>Cc: vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
> >>Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 10:24:49 AM
> >>Subject: Re: [vdsm] [RFC] An alternative way to provide a supported
> >&g
wrote:
I'm sorry, but I don't really understand the drawing
- Original Message -
From: "Shu Ming"
To: "Adam Litke"
Cc: vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 10:24:49 AM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] [RFC] An alternative way to provide a s
I'm sorry, but I don't really understand the drawing
- Original Message -
> From: "Shu Ming"
> To: "Adam Litke"
> Cc: vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 10:24:49 AM
> Subject: Re: [vdsm] [RFC] An alt
Adam,
Maybe, I don't fully understand your proposal. Here is my
understanding of libvdsm in the picture. Please check the following link
for the picture.
http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/File:Libvdsm.JPG
http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/File:Libvdsm.JPG
On 2012-7-9 21:56, Adam Litke wrote:
On Fri, Ju
- Original Message -
> From: "Itamar Heim"
> To: "Saggi Mizrahi"
> Cc: "Adam Litke" , vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
> Sent: Monday, July 9, 2012 11:03:43 AM
> Subject: Re: [vdsm] [RFC] An alternative way to provide a supported interf
Litke"
To: "Itamar Heim"
Cc: vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Sent: Monday, July 9, 2012 9:56:17 AM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] [RFC] An alternative way to provide a supported interface
-- libvdsm
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 03:53:08PM +0300, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 07/06/2012 01:15 AM, Robert
9:56:17 AM
> Subject: Re: [vdsm] [RFC] An alternative way to provide a supported interface
> -- libvdsm
>
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 03:53:08PM +0300, Itamar Heim wrote:
> > On 07/06/2012 01:15 AM, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
> > >On 07/05/2012 04:45 PM, Adam Litke wrote
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 03:53:08PM +0300, Itamar Heim wrote:
> On 07/06/2012 01:15 AM, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
> >On 07/05/2012 04:45 PM, Adam Litke wrote:
> >>On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 03:47:42PM -0400, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
> >>>
> >>>- Original Message -
> From: "Adam Litke"
> T
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 01:30:43PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 07:17:44AM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
> > Adding danpb and DV to get some perspective from libvirt...
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 05:02:59PM -0400, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I am not
On 07/06/2012 01:15 AM, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
On 07/05/2012 04:45 PM, Adam Litke wrote:
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 03:47:42PM -0400, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Adam Litke"
To: "Saggi Mizrahi"
Cc: "Anthony Liguori" , "VDSM Project
Development"
Sent: Thursday,
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 07:17:44AM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
> Adding danpb and DV to get some perspective from libvirt...
>
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 05:02:59PM -0400, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I am not sure I am ready to conceed that XML-RPC is too slow for our
> > > needs. Can
> >
Adding danpb and DV to get some perspective from libvirt...
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 05:02:59PM -0400, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Adam Litke"
> > To: "Saggi Mizrahi"
> > Cc: "Anthony Liguori" , "VDSM Project Development"
> >
> > Sent: Thursday, July 5,
On 07/05/2012 04:45 PM, Adam Litke wrote:
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 03:47:42PM -0400, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Adam Litke"
To: "Saggi Mizrahi"
Cc: "Anthony Liguori" , "VDSM Project Development"
Sent: Thursday, July 5, 2012 2:34:50 PM
Subject: Re: [RFC] An alte
- Original Message -
> From: "Adam Litke"
> To: "Saggi Mizrahi"
> Cc: "Anthony Liguori" , "VDSM Project Development"
>
> Sent: Thursday, July 5, 2012 4:45:08 PM
> Subject: Re: [RFC] An alternative way to provide a supported interface --
> libvdsm
>
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 03:47:42
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 03:47:42PM -0400, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Adam Litke"
> > To: "Saggi Mizrahi"
> > Cc: "Anthony Liguori" , "VDSM Project Development"
> >
> > Sent: Thursday, July 5, 2012 2:34:50 PM
> > Subject: Re: [RFC] An alternative way to
- Original Message -
> From: "Adam Litke"
> To: "Saggi Mizrahi"
> Cc: "Anthony Liguori" , "VDSM Project Development"
>
> Sent: Thursday, July 5, 2012 2:34:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [RFC] An alternative way to provide a supported interface --
> libvdsm
>
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 02:50:02
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 02:50:02PM -0400, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
> The idea of having a supported C API was something I was thinking about doing
> (But I'd rather use gobject introspection and not schema generation) But the
> problem is not having a C API is using the current XML RPC API as it's base
On 06/27/2012 05:38 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
On 06/27/2012 05:13 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
The idea of having a supported C API was something I was thinking
about doing (But I'd rather use gobject introspection and not
schema
generation)
B
- Original Message -
> On 06/27/2012 05:13 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> >> The idea of having a supported C API was something I was thinking
> >> about doing (But I'd rather use gobject introspection and not
> >> schema
> >> generation)
> >> But the pro
On 06/27/2012 05:13 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
The idea of having a supported C API was something I was thinking
about doing (But I'd rather use gobject introspection and not schema
generation)
But the problem is not having a C API is using the current XML RPC
API as it
- Original Message -
> The idea of having a supported C API was something I was thinking
> about doing (But I'd rather use gobject introspection and not schema
> generation)
> But the problem is not having a C API is using the current XML RPC
> API as it's base
>
> The current XML-RPC AP
The idea of having a supported C API was something I was thinking about doing
(But I'd rather use gobject introspection and not schema generation)
But the problem is not having a C API is using the current XML RPC API as it's
base
The current XML-RPC API contains a lot of decencies and inefficie
Hi,
I've been reading through the API threads here and considering the options. To
be honest, I worry a lot about the scope of these discussions and that there's a
tremendous amount of work before we have a useful end result.
I wonder if we can solve this problem by adding another layer of a
31 matches
Mail list logo
