sage -
From: "Alon Bar-Lev"
To: "Itamar Heim"
Cc: "Juan Hernandez" , "arch"
, "VDSM Project Development"
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 9:52:33 AM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] [RFC] Implied UUIDs in API
- Original Message -
From: "I
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 02:23:54PM -0700, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 05:19:46PM -0400, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
> > Hi, in the API a lot of IDs get passed around are UUIDs.
> > The point is that as long as you are not the entity generating the UUIDs
> > the fact that these are
y.
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Alon Bar-Lev"
> > To: "Itamar Heim"
> > Cc: "Juan Hernandez" , "arch"
> > , "VDSM Project Development"
> >
> > Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 9:52:33 AM
> >
On 08/31/2012 11:27 AM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Itamar Heim"
>> To: "Alon Bar-Lev"
>> Cc: "Saggi Mizrahi" , "arch" , "VDSM
>> Project Development"
>>
>&
+1
Long ago it was not enforced and then changed.
The motivation for the enforcing as I recall was that for VMs this was also the
guest system ID. I don't know if this is the case now days.
Regards,
Simon
Sent from my iPhone, please excuse any typos.
ב-31 באוג 2012, בשעה 00:19, Saggi Mizrahi
ot; , "arch" , "VDSM
> Project Development"
>
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 9:52:33 AM
> Subject: Re: [vdsm] [RFC] Implied UUIDs in API
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Itamar Heim"
> > To: "Alon Bar-Lev"
- Original Message -
> From: "Itamar Heim"
> To: "Alon Bar-Lev"
> Cc: "Juan Hernandez" , "arch" , "VDSM
> Project Development"
>
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 4:22:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [vdsm] [RF
On 08/31/2012 03:36 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Juan Hernandez"
To: "Alon Bar-Lev"
Cc: "Itamar Heim" , "arch" , "VDSM Project
Development"
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 12:36:10 PM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] [RFC]
- Original Message -
> From: "Juan Hernandez"
> To: "Alon Bar-Lev"
> Cc: "Itamar Heim" , "arch" , "VDSM Project
> Development"
>
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 12:36:10 PM
> Subject: Re: [vdsm] [RF
- Original Message -
> From: "Itamar Heim"
> To: "Alon Bar-Lev"
> Cc: "Saggi Mizrahi" , "arch" , "VDSM
> Project Development"
>
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 12:23:38 PM
> Subject: Re: [vdsm] [RF
On 08/31/2012 12:33 AM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Saggi Mizrahi"
To: "arch" , "VDSM Project Development"
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 12:19:46 AM
Subject: [vdsm] [RFC] Implied UUIDs in API
Hi, in the API a lot of IDs get passed
- Original Message -
> From: "Saggi Mizrahi"
> To: "arch" , "VDSM Project Development"
>
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 12:19:46 AM
> Subject: [vdsm] [RFC] Implied UUIDs in API
>
> Hi, in the API a lot of IDs get passed around ar
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 05:19:46PM -0400, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
> Hi, in the API a lot of IDs get passed around are UUIDs.
> The point is that as long as you are not the entity generating the UUIDs the
> fact that these are UUIDs have no real significance to you.
> I suggest removing the validation
Hi, in the API a lot of IDs get passed around are UUIDs.
The point is that as long as you are not the entity generating the UUIDs the
fact that these are UUIDs have no real significance to you.
I suggest removing the validation of UUIDs from the receiving end. There is no
real reason to make sure
14 matches
Mail list logo
