On 12/04/2012 11:52 PM, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
I've been throwing a lot of bits out about the new storage API and I think it's
time to talk a bit.
I will purposefully try and keep implementation details away and concentrate
about how the API looks and how you use it.
First major change is in
On 12/07/2012 09:53 PM, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
...
connectStorageRepository(repoId, repoFormat,
connectionParameters={}):
repoId - is a transient name that will be used to refer to the
connected domain, it is not persisted and doesn't have to be the
same across the cluster.
repoFormat -
- Original Message -
From: Itamar Heim ih...@redhat.com
To: Saggi Mizrahi smizr...@redhat.com
Cc: VDSM Project Development vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org,
engine-devel engine-de...@ovirt.org
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 6:18:13 AM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] RFC: New Storage API
Subject: Re: [vdsm] RFC: New Storage API
On 12/04/2012 11:52 PM, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
I've been throwing a lot of bits out about the new storage API
and
I think it's time to talk a bit.
I will purposefully try and keep implementation details away and
concentrate about how the API looks
@lists.fedorahosted.org, Deepak C Shetty
deepa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2012 11:40:01 PM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] RFC: New Storage API
On 12/08/2012 01:23 AM, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Deepak C Shetty deepa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
To: Saggi Mizrahi
@lists.fedorahosted.org, Deepak C Shetty
deepa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Sent: Friday, December 7, 2012 12:23:15 AM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] RFC: New Storage API
On 12/06/2012 10:22 PM, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Shu Ming shum...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
To: Saggi Mizrahi smizr...@redhat.com
Cc
: Thursday, December 6, 2012 11:02:02 AM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] RFC: New Storage API
Saggi,
Thanks for sharing your thought and I get some comments below.
Saggi Mizrahi:
I've been throwing a lot of bits out about the new storage API and
I think it's time to talk a bit.
I
Subject: Re: [vdsm] RFC: New Storage API
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 02:53:41PM -0500, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
snip
1) Can you provide more info on why there is a exception for 'lvm
based
block domain'. Its not coming out clearly.
File based domains are responsible for syncing up object
-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 1:49:31 PM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] RFC: New Storage API
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 02:53:41PM -0500, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
snip
1) Can you provide more info on why there is a exception for 'lvm
based
block domain'. Its
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 03:36:23PM -0500, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
Statements like this make me start to worry about your userData
concept. It's a
sign of a bad API if the user needs to invent a custom metadata
scheme for
itself. This reminds me of the abomination that is the 'custom'
: Re: [vdsm] RFC: New Storage API
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 03:36:23PM -0500, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
Statements like this make me start to worry about your userData
concept. It's a
sign of a bad API if the user needs to invent a custom metadata
scheme for
itself. This reminds me
10, 2012 1:39:51 PM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] RFC: New Storage API
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 11:52:01AM -0500, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Shu Ming shum...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
To: Saggi Mizrahi smizr...@redhat.com
Cc: VDSM Project Development
vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Sent: Friday, December 7, 2012 12:23:15 AM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] RFC: New Storage API
On 12/06/2012 10:22 PM, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Shu Ming shum...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
To: Saggi Mizrahi smizr...@redhat.com
Cc: VDSM Project Development
vdsm
Saggi,
Thanks for sharing your thought and I get some comments below.
Saggi Mizrahi:
I've been throwing a lot of bits out about the new storage API and I think it's
time to talk a bit.
I will purposefully try and keep implementation details away and concentrate
about how the API looks and
- Original Message -
From: Tony Asleson tasle...@redhat.com
To: vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 5, 2012 4:48:34 PM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] RFC: New Storage API
On 12/04/2012 03:52 PM, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
I've been throwing a lot of bits out about the new
- Original Message -
From: Shu Ming shum...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
To: Saggi Mizrahi smizr...@redhat.com
Cc: VDSM Project Development vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org,
engine-devel engine-de...@ovirt.org
Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2012 11:02:02 AM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] RFC: New
:02 AM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] RFC: New Storage API
Saggi,
Thanks for sharing your thought and I get some comments below.
Saggi Mizrahi:
I've been throwing a lot of bits out about the new storage API and
I think it's time to talk a bit.
I will purposefully try and keep implementation details away
On 12/04/2012 03:52 PM, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
I've been throwing a lot of bits out about the new storage API and I think
it's time to talk a bit.
I will purposefully try and keep implementation details away and concentrate
about how the API looks and how you use it.
First major change is
I've been throwing a lot of bits out about the new storage API and I think it's
time to talk a bit.
I will purposefully try and keep implementation details away and concentrate
about how the API looks and how you use it.
First major change is in terminology, there is no long a storage domain
Thanks for sharing this. It's nice to have something a little more concrete to
think about. Just a few comments and questions inline to get some discussion
flowing.
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 04:52:40PM -0500, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
I've been throwing a lot of bits out about the new storage API and
- Original Message -
From: Adam Litke a...@us.ibm.com
To: Saggi Mizrahi smizr...@redhat.com
Cc: VDSM Project Development vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org,
engine-devel engine-de...@ovirt.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 6:08:25 PM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] RFC: New Storage API
21 matches
Mail list logo