On Thursday, November 13, 2003, at 06:03 PM, Marinó A. Jónsson wrote:
I thought that beta was a good term if it was 'here she be
- what do
you think' rather than "this is what we're releasing if no
problems".
If the latter, I don't see why you don't rc1 it...
put that way, i'm more inclined to agr
Marinó A. Jónsson said:
> >> I thought that beta was a good term if it was 'here she be
> - what do
> >> you think' rather than "this is what we're releasing if no
> problems".
> >> If the latter, I don't see why you don't rc1 it...
> >
> > put that way, i'm more inclined to agree. Marino, what do
Tim Colson said:
> > If we at least get the demo apps in order before the release,
> > I'd say rc1 it.
> Been meaning to ask about that... the layout example app works in TC 3.x
> but failed to startup in Tomcat 4.1.18. Anybody else had that problem or
> is it just my machine being pesky?
i've run
> If we at least get the demo apps in order before the release,
> I'd say rc1 it.
Been meaning to ask about that... the layout example app works in TC 3.x
but failed to startup in Tomcat 4.1.18. Anybody else had that problem or
is it just my machine being pesky?
Timo
---
> >> I thought that beta was a good term if it was 'here she be
> - what do
> >> you think' rather than "this is what we're releasing if no
> problems".
> >> If the latter, I don't see why you don't rc1 it...
> >
> > put that way, i'm more inclined to agree. Marino, what do
> you think?
If w
On Thursday, November 13, 2003, at 05:14 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. said:
On Monday, November 10, 2003, at 07:27 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote:
...
Vote: Velocity Tools 1.1 non-final release *status*
[2] Release it as Ve
Geir Magnusson Jr. said:
> On Monday, November 10, 2003, at 07:27 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote:
...
> >>
> >> Vote: Velocity Tools 1.1 non-final release *status*
> >> [2] Release it as VelocityTools 1.1-beta1
> >(nathan, marino, and
On Monday, November 10, 2003, at 07:27 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote:
Nathan Bubna said:
here's the totals:
...
Vote: Velocity Tools 1.1 non-final release
[3] +1 I am in favor of the release, and will help support it
(nathan, mari
On Tuesday, November 11, 2003, at 01:53 PM, Daniel L. Rall wrote:
Chris Miller wrote:
Has anyone heard of any problems with a 1.4.x-compiled jar in a 1.3.x
environment?
geir
No, this should work fine as long as there are no dependencies on JDK
1.4
code encountered at runtime. Also, compiling with
On Tuesday, November 11, 2003, at 06:48 PM, Dave Newton wrote:
Hey,
Major personal issue (one of many :) minor real-life issue:
The IntelliJ and Cotsec powered-by blurbs say "it's" where we really
mean "its"--"it's" means "it is", "its" is the possessive form.
You are 100% right. I know the dif
geirm 2003/11/13 11:30:40
Modified:xdocsindex.xml powered.xml
docs index.html powered.html
Log:
fix several cases of "it's" where it should be "its"
Revision ChangesPath
1.72 +2 -2 jakarta-velocity/xdocs/index.xml
Index: index.xml
11 matches
Mail list logo
