RE: [Veritas-bu] "media manager terminated by parent process"

2006-01-11 Thread Eric Ljungblad
Title: "media manager terminated by parent process" Sounds like a bad tape. - previouis backup image on that tape require that tape to advance to after a current un-expired image the 1st copy has not expired yet and is in non expiration of continous active images. use bpexpdate -ev ##

[Veritas-bu] Vmware virtual machines Netbackup client licenses.

2006-01-11 Thread Broun, Bevan
This is the info I got confirmed. Note the "one NetBackup component for each Operating System and Database type". << MULTIPLE DOMAIN OR VIRTUAL MACHINE SYSTEMS NetBackup components (servers, clients, and database agents) for UNIX, Windows, NetWare, and Linux are each licensed once per physical m

Re: [Veritas-bu] Vmware virtual machines vs Netbackup

2006-01-11 Thread Dean
That's only if you're backing up the physical host using the Redhat client.   If you're backing up the virtual hosts (ie - you install the NBU client in the VM's) you still need a license per virtual client. I've had *this* confirmed by Veritas. (although that doesn't necessarily mean it's correct!

RE: [Veritas-bu] MP4

2006-01-11 Thread DOON ENG
For those with the problem, when VSP does not get cleaned up, which directory would it be in , on the Windows server ? Doon Eng Enterprise Storage Group (ESG) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of a raja Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 11:22 PM

RE: [Veritas-bu] Vmware virtual machines vs Netbackup

2006-01-11 Thread Mark . Donaldson
Thanks all - I have no worries on this now. -M ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Vmware virtual machines vs Netbackup

2006-01-11 Thread Broun, Bevan
Others have noted that is is doable and supported. What hasnt been said yet is that veritas only require 1 license (of each client) type to backup all virtual machines running on a physical system. That is, veritas is licensing the physical hardware. I have confirmed this with veritas. For me, th

RE: [Veritas-bu] snapshot errors 156 etc..

2006-01-11 Thread Steven Cashman
Title: Message Bpclient access the ClientDB. Host properties, MasterServer, Client attributes From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yosifovski, TammySent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 1:51 PMTo: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] snapshot er

RE: [Veritas-bu] snapshot errors 156 etc..

2006-01-11 Thread Yosifovski, Tammy
Title: Message Master: Windows 2000, Netbackup 5.1 MP3. Client: Windows 2003 - DFS server   I have tried disabling VSP in the Netbackup GUI and I have tried the commands below (on Windows) but each time I run bpclient -client -L I still see VSP_USE = YES.    I am not seeing t

[Veritas-bu] "media manager terminated by parent process"

2006-01-11 Thread Aaron Mills
Title: "media manager terminated by parent process" Does anyone know what this error means? I've got a backup of a few hundred gig that won't run. I kick it off and after some period of time the backup fails with the following error: 14:47:50.156 [291] <2> bptm: INITIATING (VERBOSE = 1): -U

RE: [Veritas-bu] looking for ACSLS user guide or admin guide

2006-01-11 Thread Schaefer, Harry
They are available, but from the CRC (customer resource area). You can get a login/password from your sales guy or there is a request form on the website... http://storagetek.com/support/online_resources.html#access_crc Harry S. Atlanta, GA -Original Message-

RE: [Veritas-bu] Vmware virtual machines vs Netbackup

2006-01-11 Thread briandiven
We are using VMWare. You have choices as to backing up the physical or logical servers. The physical servers will get a status 1 because the .DSK files (the logical servers) are open files. You can quiesce the logical servers during the backup however this was not optimal for us. We chose to b

RE: [Veritas-bu] Vmware virtual machines vs Netbackup

2006-01-11 Thread Adametz, Bluejay
> Anybody running a Client and/or Media server on a Virtual Machine over > VMWare? We're going to have a requirement to starting backing up both > Windows & Redhat Linux running as virtual machines. I've gotten as far as seeing that vmware does present SAN tape drives to a RedHat virtual machine,

RE: [Veritas-bu] Vmware virtual machines vs Netbackup

2006-01-11 Thread Snyder, Nicholas A.
I backup a RedHat ES 3, WinNT4, and Win2000 virtual machines on a VMWare ESX server. Each virtual machine runs it's own instance of the client. All my virtual machines are clients (no media servers). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL

Re: [Veritas-bu] Vmware virtual machines vs Netbackup

2006-01-11 Thread David Rock
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-11 10:18]: > Anybody running a Client and/or Media server on a Virtual Machine over > VMWare? We're going to have a requirement to starting backing up both > Windows & Redhat Linux running as virtual machines. Yeah, it works fine. We have several V

RE: [Veritas-bu] snapshot errors 156 etc..

2006-01-11 Thread Steven Cashman
If you care to search the System Administrators Guide explains in detail how to configure / disable both, you can also find tons of info to help you on the Veritas support page.   VSS = Microsoft Volume Shadow Copy Service.   VSP = VERITAS Volume Snapshot Provider   This is from memory so mig

[Veritas-bu] Vmware virtual machines vs Netbackup

2006-01-11 Thread Mark . Donaldson
Anybody running a Client and/or Media server on a Virtual Machine over VMWare? We're going to have a requirement to starting backing up both Windows & Redhat Linux running as virtual machines. On the surface, it looks like it should be doable but confirmation would be nice. -M +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Win2k3 x64 - Not ready for prime time

2006-01-11 Thread Andrew Stueve
Lets see, no non-cluster x64 servers around. So no testing of standard clients. >not running on the Node > I assume you mean the backup happening on the standby node of the cluster. Yes, that is why I am pulling my hair out. It works! Situation: Node 1 active, node 2 standby. Node 2 will ba

RE: [Veritas-bu] snapshot errors 156 etc..

2006-01-11 Thread Paul Keating
Title: Message I had the same issues. "disabling" Open File Backups it from the GUI didn't work.   or rather "not enabling it" from the GUI didn't work.   So.from the CLI of my Solaris NBU Master, I did the following:   bash-2.03# bpclient -client -update -WOFB_enabled 0 bash-2.03# ech

RE: [Veritas-bu] snapshot errors 156 etc..

2006-01-11 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Title: Message Bobby Have you checked the CLIENT properties ?? You mentioned you have checked the HOST MASTER PROPERTIES, which is fine, but if you goto the CLIENT properties, there should be an option under WINDOWS CLIENT and there is an option called VSP !   Make sure there is nothing ena

[Veritas-bu] snapshot errors 156 etc..

2006-01-11 Thread Bobby R Windle
Anyone have the problem of not being able to disable VSS snapshot on windows clients? I have nothing selected in the master server client properties or the client  side but it still wants to use it on the client backups.  Get no answers from Veritas on how to disable this. Seems another part of Ve

[Veritas-bu] looking for ACSLS user guide or admin guide

2006-01-11 Thread T. Nguyen
Hi all I'm looking for ACSLS user guide or admin guide. I checked in storagetek but it hasn't, thanks Tom netbackup admin __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

RE: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 5.1 and autofs/Linux

2006-01-11 Thread Paul Keating
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Jeff Lightner > I wouldn't backup via autofs. First why backup via NFS rather than > backing up the filesystem from its native host? You still have the > network impact but don't have to worry abo

[Veritas-bu] RMAN Error in Solaris 8

2006-01-11 Thread Paul Porcelli
Hi folks, having problems with some of our Oracle RMAN backups. See errors below. Has anyone else come across this problem ? Thanks for any info. Paul Excerpt from RMAN Log === RMAN-03026: error recovery releasing channel resources RMAN-08031: released channel: c1 RMAN-08031:

[Veritas-bu] RE: Win21k script to stop AV service during backup & restart when fin ished (WEAVER, Simon)

2006-01-11 Thread Andrew Johnson
Well we have it working for multipie streams here so it waits till all the streams are finised before it start here is our modified Pervasive agent backup scritpts.   ***Bpstart_notify.bat   @rem creates a file associated with each stream running on the client@echo "" > c:\temp\backup\%1.%STREA

RE: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 5.1 and autofs/Linux

2006-01-11 Thread Jeff Lightner
I wouldn't backup via autofs. First why backup via NFS rather than backing up the filesystem from its native host? You still have the network impact but don't have to worry about NFS' overhead and quirks. Second if you really have to do NFS why do autofs? You could set up a script to mount th

RE: [Veritas-bu] Win21k script to stop AV service during backup & restart when fin ished

2006-01-11 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Ok well that's pants! But I may have a work around - I have a routine that I can run during the bpstart script which I will implement tonight - am I right in believing that I do NOT NEED to use an end script if I do not want to? If this is correct, I can run a routine in the start script to do w

Re: [Veritas-bu] Win21k script to stop AV service during backup & restart when fin ished

2006-01-11 Thread Ed Wilts
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 07:13:07AM -, WEAVER, Simon wrote: > Ok I got the script to work, which is great - only one problem I see - the > client has multiple paritions and is being backed up using ALL LOCAL DRIVES > - although the services stop fine, it appears that as soon as one of the > stre

RE: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Win2k3 x64 - Not ready for prime time

2006-01-11 Thread WEAVER, Simon
I don't think I said to do it over the Network? Ok, if the backup is not running on the Node, do you get any status error messages? What if you uninstall / reinstall the client software and possibly create a new backup policy for the node that secondary node? Maybe MP5 will help. As you said