Yes, back in the 3.4 days I saw this caused by both Compaq Insight Manager and HP EMS (on HPUX servers). I don't know if the Microsoft's RSM service would do the same, as I always turn it off.
But as Jack says, SCSI RESERVE should fix the problem.
Cheers,
Dean
On 1/17/06, Jack L. Forester, Jr.
Ya, I know. That's why I have
the SCO servers in the first place. After working in this field for
13 years, I have run across several such applications, both home grown
and purchased.
My point was that 3.4 clients are no
longer supported when you move to NetBackup 5.0 or above. And with
upgr
Hi Richard.
Yes what you say is true, but 4.5 is going out of support
this summer. This means that up to then are issues are suported. I
suppose that most issues regarding NT (since NT has been rather static for some
years) have been resolved. But it's not a matter of implementation,
but
I take it that since your tape drives are on a SAN, they are being
shared by multiple hosts? The "external event caused rewind" suggests
that while one server was performing a backup, another host that can see
the drives did a SCSI inquiry or some other command to the drive which
caused it to
Hi.
You need to have a licence for SPS. When you enter the key , the SPS backup
type will appear in the list.
>From what I have read SPS 2003 is backed up by the SQL Agent.
Regards,
Jim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alley, Chris
Sent:
Mark and Jim
Be aware that using clients older then one generation
may work, you may run into what I have. I have several SCO Openserver
5 clients running the NetBackup 3.4 client software on them. I just
upgraded our Master/Media server from 4.5 FP 6 to 5.1 MP 4. Now,
I am able to back the se
I apologize in advance if this question has been asked/answered already.
I am running NetBackup 5.0 MP5 with Linux Master and Media servers and I
am looking to backup Windows Sharepoint Servers. From what I have seen
NBU will backup SPS (Sharepoint Portal Services) but I haven't seen
anything list
I have a 3.4 HPUX client on a 5.0 Master. Although Veritas
says not supported, it doesn't mean it doesn't work. Your problem will be only
if you need support.
Regards,
Jim
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kilpatrick,
MarkSent: Monday, January 16, 2006 5:55 P
NT4 is no longer supported as a client for
backup using Netbackup v6.0. Will I be able to continue to backup my NT4
clients using client software version 4.5 FP6 and Netbackup Master server
version 6.0.
Thanks, Mark
Due to continued expansion Sabeo Technologies have moved of
Title: Message
Hi
Daryl
The biggest
gains you may / will see are by changing the NET_BUFFER_SZ, NUMBER_DATA_BUFFERS
and SIZE_DATA_BUFFERS. Make sure that the SIZE_DATA_BUFFERS are appropriate for
your tape drives.
You can also translate some of the kernel tuning
for NT/2000/2003 and/or
Hello all:
Was wondering if anyone out there has any documentation on
tuning NBU performance for obtaining maximum throughput of LTO2/LTO3 tape
devices under Windows 2003?
Any info would be greatly appreciated; there doesn’t
seem to be a lot of info available on the Veritas support
Title: Message
Hi
Eric
I was
not sure if there was a problem, but I just wanted to be sure I was not
overlooking anything obvious. Yes it completes on the 2nd attempt fine, with no
problems.
Logging was not enabled at the stage, so I do not have much to go on at
the moment. And I went int
Title: [Veritas-bu] Periodic status 84 on IBM 3584 with LTO3
Keep in mind that that the
tape device drivers Are sending you these messages - since we made it past the
loader we should look at the drivers on the drives or the firmware - should have
firmware 1.07 or better on the drives and
Title: Message
check your all log or
problems with backups reports. sounds like a small glitch/retry but
completed successfully?
so whats the problem? your retry attempts
make this possible, but if you are using user backups set off by the client then
u only have one attempt for user back
Title: Message
Hi
all
Over the past 2
weeks, one of my SAN MEdia Servers is blue screening - sometimes it happens
during a backup, other times the blue screen appears to happen with no backups
are running.
I had ruled NBU
being to blame as its been running flawless for some time now, howe
Hi Michael
Any changes recently - cable / connections to be checked?
Drivers or firmware
New Tapes may be worth a try perhaps.
Can you enable logging for future backups and maybe we can determine the
cause?
Simon Weaver
Technical Support
Windows Domain Administrator
EADS Astrium
Tel: 02392-
Hello All
We have an IBM 3584 with LTO3 drives SAN attached to a windows 2003 server.
We're getting status 84 with external event caused rewind
We havn't been able to find anything in the logs
Any ideas/suggestions will be appriecated
Regards
Michael
--
Cybercity Webhosting (http://www.cyberc
Thank you Marcel
Please be assured I was not out to criticise, merely wanted to be sure what
I was advising a colleague was 100% correct, otherwise they will end up
re-importing a lot of tapes :-)
Thank you very, very much!
Simon Weaver
Technical Support
Windows Domain Administrator
EADS Ast
Simon,
Ah, never too old to learn! You are right, the -backupID switch will set
the expiration date for the image. Until now I always used the -m
(mediaID) switch, I think it was the only one available in version
3.4.1., which was the first version I was trained on. But if you look at
the commands
Title: Message
Morning
Came in this morning
after having a month and few weeks of 100% successful backups to find this in
the activity log for a client
14/01/2006 04:26:09
- Error bptm(pid=4968) write error on media id 4944L3, drive index 1, EOM
returned when writing media header14/01/2006
20 matches
Mail list logo
