RE: [Veritas-bu] Win21k script to stop AV service during backup & restart when fin ished

2006-01-31 Thread manuel . j . desousa
Simon, You might want to create locks for each stream, and delete the stream when done, and check for all streams completed (no more stream lock files) which will then run the last job - start the AV. See this doco: http://support.veritas.com/docs/208340 JdS

RE: [Veritas-bu] Suspended tapes

2006-01-31 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Title: Message Morning Greg, The recommended way (and the only way that I use) is the following command parameter     bpmedia -m -unsuspend   This should release the tape back for Netbackup to use   HTH   Simon WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astriu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Restricting tapes to a single stream

2006-01-31 Thread David Rock
* Greenberg, Katherine A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-31 11:15]: > The only way I can conceive of you doing this is to > > 1. Set up separate policies for each stream of the database. > 2. Set up 3 volume pools. > 3. Assign a different volume pool to each policy. This is the most likely way

RE: [Veritas-bu] NetApp/NAS - Backups

2006-01-31 Thread Kennedy, Jeffrey
Funny, BakBone supported Dynamic Drive Sharing on NetApp over 2 years ago. I don't think the issue is with NetApp nor has it ever been. ~JK -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Anderson Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 2:46 PM To: [EMAI

RE: [Veritas-bu] NetApp/NAS - Backups

2006-01-31 Thread Michael Anderson
I haven't used the filer as a remote agent so I can not comment on that. Well actually I can't comment on the Unix version either. I am using direct attached filers to HP LTO2 drives for direct dumps of my larger systems. For the smaller filers I use three-way NDMP through the Win2k3 Master atta

[Veritas-bu] VxSS Install Requirements

2006-01-31 Thread Steve . Bally
All, I am on NBU 5.1 MP3A in a Windows 2k3 environment, we are looking to upgrade to 6.0 here in the near future, reading the documents for the install / upgrade, it appears that VxSS needs to be installed and configured prior to the upgrade to 6.0. I have seen several strings on this forum that

RE: [Veritas-bu] Suspended tapes

2006-01-31 Thread Hindle, Greg
Title: Message Thanks!       Greg     -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 6:22 PMTo: Hindle, Greg; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Suspended tapes bpmedia -m -unsuspend.  

RE: [Veritas-bu] Suspended tapes

2006-01-31 Thread Mark . Donaldson
Title: Suspended tapes bpmedia -m -unsuspend.   They return to normal use after all the images expire if you just let them age without intervention.   -M -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Hindle, GregSent: Tuesday, January 31,

RE: [Veritas-bu] NetApp/NAS - Backups

2006-01-31 Thread Mark . Donaldson
For those of you using Remote NDMP, how many are using the Netbackup for NDMP agent on a unix server to act as the third-party agent? How is the performance of the Unix agent as compared to using a filer as a remote agent? -M -Original Message- From: Greenberg, Katherine A [mailto:[EMAI

[Veritas-bu] Suspended tapes

2006-01-31 Thread Hindle, Greg
Title: Suspended tapes Nb 5.1 mp3 I have a few suspended tapes and I need to un-suspended these. What is the recommended way to put these tapes back in service?   Greg   >>> This e-mail and any attachments are confidential, may contain legal, professional or other privileged informat

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetApp/NAS - Backups

2006-01-31 Thread Michael Anderson
This is in the compatability list: http://ftp.support.veritas.com/pub/support/products/NetBackup_DataCenter/251713.pdf You will notice that for the EMC product line it says support for SSO, which lacks in the NetApp line. The issue is that NetApp doesn't support SCSI Reserve/Release. They use p

RE: [Veritas-bu] HP LTO 3 Ultrium & WIN2K03 NBU Optimization?

2006-01-31 Thread Bahnmiller, Bryan
Daryl,     We’re running 256KB buffers on our Win2003 Dell servers with Emulex fibrechannel HBA’s. I would estimate that our throughput went up about 25% when set the SIZE_DATA_BUFFERS to 256 KB, and set the NET_BUFFER_SZ - or the Communications buffer size in the Host Properties -> Clien

RE: [Veritas-bu] Sun GigaSwift (ce) cards

2006-01-31 Thread Jorgensen, Bill
Title: RE: [Veritas-bu] Sun GigaSwift (ce) cards Scott:   On the Sol10 network inquiry. They have rearchitected the stack so that UDP and TCP are not separate STREAMS between IP. They have combined them to improve on efficiency by about 20% on network transactions.   That is all I know at

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetApp/NAS - Backups

2006-01-31 Thread Broun, Bevan
on Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 10:45:46AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just FYI: although the v6.0 feature list has shared drives for NDMP, both > Netapp & Veritas say it doesn't work. Hi Mark This is very important for me. Do you know where veritas and/or netapp say this doesn

RE: [Veritas-bu] Sun GigaSwift (ce) cards

2006-01-31 Thread Chapman, Scott
I am using these cards with little tuning, but I am also using these to create a trunk (cisco etherchannel) with them for our backup network. The backup servers have a 4 x 1gig trunk to the backup network. This works very well . . . I also just found out that the trunk software is free to use on

RE: [Veritas-bu] HP LTO 3 Ultrium & WIN2K03 NBU Optimization?

2006-01-31 Thread Jim Peppas
Hi,   From what I have seen , the 64KB limit is due to some HBA's. You can do some test backups and then restores with more than 64K buffers. If you dont have a problem, then most probably you wont have any in the future.  I have run backup's with 256KB without any problems (though on LTO2 b

RE: [Veritas-bu] virtual tape library vs disk storage unit

2006-01-31 Thread King, Cheryl
I attached some notes I took from previous disk backup discussions on this Email list. Hope it helps. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Stump Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 11:56 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Verita

RE: [Veritas-bu] HP LTO 3 Ultrium & WIN2K03 NBU Optimization?

2006-01-31 Thread Ambrose, Monte
Daryl   A large SIZE_DATA_BUFFERS is not always the best configuration.  If the Windows limitation is 64KB I would go with that.  You also need to set the NUMBER_DATA_BUFFERS.   Since you are using a smaller data buffer size I would increase the number of data buffers X 4.   Example: If y

RE: [Veritas-bu] HP LTO 3 Ultrium & WIN2K03 NBU Optimization?

2006-01-31 Thread Spearman, David
Title: Message We tested all sorts of configurations on our windows/unix environment. We have a w2k master/media and a w2k3 media server to lto-2 drives. Lots of win, redhat servers, a few sco. In the end we always found that a 64kb block size throughout performed best. I also use 768 buffer

RE: [Veritas-bu] virtual tape library vs disk storage unit

2006-01-31 Thread Jim Peppas
Hi. You can use storage in a VTL in an SSO fashion , which means you can share storage amoung various Media servers. If you use it as a DSU ( or DSSU) you cannot share the space amoung servers unless you have some kind of common filesystem sharing system. Regards, Jim -Original Message-

[Veritas-bu] HP LTO 3 Ultrium & WIN2K03 NBU Optimization?

2006-01-31 Thread Daryl Katauskas
Hello all:   Am in the midst of deploying new HP LTO3 (Fibre) drives in our NBU environment and am finding some conflicting information regarding NBU buffer configuration.   (Using Qlogic & Emulex HBA’s).   HP recommends the following settings:    \ NetBackup\db\config\SIZE_DATA_BU

Re: [Veritas-bu] determine backup ID with File List

2006-01-31 Thread Wayne T Smith
You could use a separate policy for the E: drive. Details: Copy your current policy to a new policy. On the new policy, remove all other clients and change the backup spec to just E:\ . On your client, make an exclude for E:\* for just (specifically) the old policy. Now the new policy and cl

[Veritas-bu] virtual tape library vs disk storage unit

2006-01-31 Thread Bob Stump
I do not understand the advantages/disadvantages between using a disk farm as a virtual tape library as opposed to a simple disk storage unit. Which makes better use of the available space and which is easier to maintain...etc. ___ Veritas-bu maillist

Re: [Veritas-bu] Sun GigaSwift (ce) cards

2006-01-31 Thread Andrew Stueve
I am using a couple in Solaris 9 master/media servers. The only tuning I have done is make sure they are doing 1Gb auto, and have the adv_pause setting enabled. -Andrew Paul Keating wrote: > anyone using them? > > any tuning you've done to maximize performance? > > > Paul > >---

RE: [Veritas-bu] NetApp/NAS - Backups

2006-01-31 Thread Mark . Donaldson
Title: Message Oh - and to answer your question, we just NFS mount the filers to a central box & backup via NFS.  Not very efficient but we didn't want to spend the drives for dedicated backups.    We're consisdering it now that our backups have grown so huge - it may pay us back on time s

RE: [Veritas-bu] NetApp/NAS - Backups

2006-01-31 Thread Mark . Donaldson
Title: Message Just FYI: although the v6.0 feature list has shared drives for NDMP, both Netapp & Veritas say it doesn't work.   Coming soon to a patch kit near you, I guess.  It takes a pretty high level of OnTap, too.  Something to verify.   -M -Original Message-From: [EMAIL

[Veritas-bu] RE: +AFs-Veritas-bu+AF0- determine backup ID with File List

2006-01-31 Thread Mark . Donaldson
Unix, for a brief time, stores the filesystem to JobID reference in: /usr/openv/netbackup/db/jobs/ffilelogs as .f. Mine seem to go back to depth of my job-viewer info. I think that one day I should mine these out and create a database of them. -M -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECT

[Veritas-bu] determine backup ID with File List

2006-01-31 Thread Kilpatrick, Mark
If I use bpimagelist to retrieve a list of backup IDs associated with a client backup how can I determine which job (file system) is associated with which backupID. For example if I want to duplicate the E:\ drive but my client has a C D and E I am unable to determine which of the three bac

RE: [Veritas-bu] override media server VERSUS bpimage -newserver

2006-01-31 Thread Ambrose, Monte
Mark   You need to also do a bpmedia –oldserver –newserver to move the mediaDB entries if you are decommissioning the media server.  The bpimage command goes into the images catalog and changes each header file media server entry from oldserver to newserver for every image that has oldser

RE: [Veritas-bu] Restricting tapes to a single stream

2006-01-31 Thread Jeff Lightner
Thanks for your suggestion but it wouldn't work unless I was able to script it to do the suspend at the moment the stream finished one tape rather than at the end of the stream. Each stream can use 2-3 tapes (actually 4-6 since we're doing 2 copies at once) so that a retry on another stream co

RE: [Veritas-bu] Restricting tapes to a single stream

2006-01-31 Thread Greenberg, Katherine A
Title: Message The only way I can conceive of you doing this is to   1. Set up separate policies for each stream of the database. 2. Set up 3 volume pools. 3. Assign a different volume pool to each policy.   Kind of a lot of work for something you could potentially correct.     -Or

Re: [Veritas-bu] Restricting tapes to a single stream

2006-01-31 Thread Tim Hoke
Well, there's no setting of this kind, so you'll need other workarounds... As you mentioned, single stream backup. Not very desirable, so that's out. The only other item I can think of is to suspend the tapes which were used when each stream is done. This will prevent any subsequent backu

RE: [Veritas-bu] Restricting tapes to a single stream

2006-01-31 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Title: Message Jeffrey If the streams are in the same policy, then as far as I can see (and check) it may not be possible, unless you put the stream that is causing you an issue into its own seperate policy.   You mentioned you got a Status 52; without looking into my manual, is this a timeo

RE: [Veritas-bu] Restricting tapes to a single stream

2006-01-31 Thread Jeff Lightner
Title: Message To forestall further answer of this kind:   I am NOT looking for assistance in resolving the 52 error on the backup.  This problem would be caused if the issue had been any other issue that caused a retry so wouldn’t be restricted to a status 52 exit in any event.   I am

RE: [Veritas-bu] Restricting tapes to a single stream

2006-01-31 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Title: Message Jeff sorry... I already did, however that was before I got this post!   So feel free to ignore the advice :-)     Simon WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS AstriumTel: 02392-708598 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Jeff Lig

RE: [Veritas-bu] Restricting tapes to a single stream

2006-01-31 Thread Greenberg, Katherine A
Title: Message Why don't you try to identify and repair what is causing the 52 errors?   There are a few technotes and fixes for that specific error code, as it is fairly common.   ~Kate   -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Beh

[Veritas-bu] Assistance Required

2006-01-31 Thread Justin Durrant
Hi I've been asked by my manager to look at our existing backup infrastructure and see how scaleable it is. We use NetBackup here and are running version 5.0MP5 but I am unfamiliar with the interfaces etc. I have asked some colleagues of mine to provide me with some information regarding how muc

RE: [Veritas-bu] NetApp/NAS - Backups

2006-01-31 Thread Paul Keating
Title: Message I'm currently backing up a pair of NetApp gf940 filers, using Netbackup 5.0MP4 on a Solaris 8 master, with HP LTO3 drives in a STKL700 library. The master is configured as the robotic control host.   Drive(s) MUST be dedicated to the filer in pre NB6.0 versions   I have a pai

[Veritas-bu] Restricting tapes to a single stream

2006-01-31 Thread Jeff Lightner
Title: Restricting tapes to a single stream Is it possible to setup a policy in such a way that any stream will not use a tape previously used within another stream of the same backup? Background: We run our Production DB backup using 3 streams.   This backup is used for doing refreshes to

[Veritas-bu] NetApp/NAS - Backups

2006-01-31 Thread Yosifovski, Tammy
Title: NetApp/NAS - Backups Solaris 9, Netbackup 5.1 MP 3 STK L700 - 5 - 9840C drives, SSO,  ACSLS I am reading some conflicting information so I thought I would ask the experts.  How are all of you backing up your NAS devices?  Is anyone using the "enhance" Netbackup 6.0/NDMP a

[Veritas-bu] restoring file permissions??

2006-01-31 Thread Paul Keating
Title: Message A client asked if it is possible to restore ACLs on a windows file system without restoring the files.   In other words, if the file exists on the filesystem, set its ACL to what it was on the backup image without overwriting the file, but if it doesn't exist on the FS, then

[Veritas-bu] override media server VERSUS bpimage -newserver

2006-01-31 Thread Kilpatrick, Mark
I would like to change the media server that I recover from in a veritas 5.1 MP4 Windows 2003 environment. I have managed to successfully do this by using the command bpimage –newserver nbumedia –oldserver nbumaster. What exactly is the command doing when it is run? Is it accessing every im

[Veritas-bu] Restore failure of Windows Domain Controller

2006-01-31 Thread Marianne van den Berg
Title: Restore failure of Windows Domain Controller Hi We recently attempted a DR restore test. We started by restoring the Domain Controller. The system owner installed W2003 SP1 (Standard). (No domain was created - Workgroup was selected). NetBackup 5.1 Client s/w was installed + MP

RE: [Veritas-bu] slow windows backup

2006-01-31 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Dave Check the event logs for the client (Start / Run / Eventvwr) and note any unusual error messages Restart the servers in question that are having poor backup performance Check Network speeds - ensure they are running at full capacity Uninstall / resinstall the netbackup client and also apply t

RE: [Veritas-bu] new storage unit

2006-01-31 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Bob For clean running, I personally "do" stop and manually restart the services, just for my benefit that everything comes up cleanly. I don't believe it's a requirment, however in any type of support case, you may get asked the question and possibly asked to do it :-) Simon Weaver Technical Su

RE: [Veritas-bu] Images on media question

2006-01-31 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Title: Message Jim Think you are right, believe it still stays in the volume pool it was assigned to :-)     Simon WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS AstriumTel: 02392-708598 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Jim Peppas [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [Veritas-bu] policy change.....

2006-01-31 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Title: Message It should not cause a full, however I personally now leave any changes for Netbackup for Friday, when the full backups run!     Simon WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS AstriumTel: 02392-708598 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-

RE: [Veritas-bu] Images on media question

2006-01-31 Thread Jim Peppas
Hi.   Failed backups do not occupy VAILD space on tapes. When a new backup runs and appends to a tape which was used with a failed backup, Netbackup will position the tape to the end of the last VALID image on the tape, thus overwriting the invalid image.   If the tape was blank (in the scra

RE: [Veritas-bu] media server install

2006-01-31 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Only when doing VSP :-) I have certainly run backups fine without reboots, and even got away, by stopping and restarting the Netbackup service on the client :-) Good Luck ! Simon Weaver Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Tel: 02392-708598 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Vault Manager Service not starting

2006-01-31 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Bill May need to check if the upgrade supports the vault; I am not too involved with 6.0 of NBU, but I thought this was now tightly ingtegrated with the vault. What is the host o/s? if its windows, can you stop the service and set to manual? Simon Weaver Technical Support Windows Domain Admin

RE: [Veritas-bu] Is there any way to define a rule tell that do n ot backup the files which are older than 2 months

2006-01-31 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Cannot think of one. If you do a full backup, everything is backed up. There is a product called TREESIZE that I think (??) shows you when the files were last accessed. You could either:- 1) Archive the Data that is old OFF to tape and delete from the drive 2) Move the Data that is not required

RE: [Veritas-bu] Images on media question

2006-01-31 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Title: Message Hi Tim Yes that is my understanding. If the backup shows a "BOMB" icon or a red circle with a white cross, it usually means that this is an invalid backup, and I believe that netbackup will not contain any data or images for this backup job.   Thanks Simon WeaverTechnical Su