I have two Linux media servers setup with 3ware 9500S controllers using raid "50" with seagate disks. With our configuration this is two raid 5's of 6 disks each that are then striped together. I get up to about 70MB/sec writes and 300MB/sec reads after the readahead is tweaked up.
They are us
Hi all,
I have a SLES 9 box which is going to be a
master/media server. But I don’t get the library to work, or rather, I don’t
really know how to set this up.
This is my config:
HBA: Qlogic 2340
Library: StorageTek L180
Tape: StorageTek 9840B
Disk: StorageTek Flexline 380
All
Thanks to all for the help, both on-list and off. A simple one-liner
script scheduled with the Windows scheduler did the trick. 11:30
minutes for off peak. I think our on-peak ran for about 20 before I
killed it.
Jason
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Wilts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
I've
got a bit of a strange one here. NBU 5.1 MP4 running on Windows 2003 -
Backing up a Windows 2000 5.1 Client. I've got job that has been running
successfully for a long time now, haven't made any recent changes, but suddenly,
the incremental backups are running forever. The server has
Title: Message
Jonathan
Well
sounds like a DNS / Name problem - have you tried doing the backup by the IP
address?
Is
there any AV running?
I use
Checkpoints, set for 30 mins rather than the default.
Is
Data being moved, changed or anything like that?
I
wonder if the archive bit is being c
Title: Message
CAnnot
comment on this, but Data Protector is another enterprise product, that we use
here and is a good alternative to NBU!
Simon
WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator
EADS
AstriumTel: 02392-708598
Email:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-Fro
Hi all,
I misconfigured(?) my weekly full backups to run once a week, starting
Friday night, and then I changed it to run once a day, but one of the
two job started immediately because it's still within the window, but
the other one still hasn't started yet by itself, any reasons?
Many thanks,
Hi,
Yes I
appreciate that, also all of the different backup images on a tape need to be
expired for the tape to be reused. What stumps me at the moment is getting
information from Netbackup's catalog. There is no bpcatlist in the
installation!
Regards
Pete
-Original Message-Fr
That's what I ended up doing to both of the copies. Then I changed the
"Maximum backup copies" back to 2 and reran the duplicate. Everything
is good now. Thanks for everyone's replys.
Wayne BeDour
IT Unix System Administrator
PH: 313-240-3374 FAX: 313-240-3065
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Agreed. 70MB/sec writes is disappointing but acceptable for my requirements. On a fast cpu machine you'll see better performance with software raid. That's normal. There's lots of other reasons to go with 3ware. Here's what led me there:
- Auto-sector repair. With big disks, this is critical.
Hi All,
Can anyone tell me what kind of speed do you get when duplicating?
I have a lib with LTO2 drives. When duplicating from disk, I get around
15Mb/sec. When duplicating from tape about 25Mb/sec.
What your speeds?
Thanks,
Jim
___
Veritas-bu ma
1) You will need a Windows Server setup
as a Windows BMR boot server. This is a Big change from NB 4.6, we complained
to our sales rep about this. Since we have a Solaris 10 master, we need
another windows computer to boot the other clients. It seems that the reason
that it was changed because of
I have a simple NetBackup 6.0 setup with Windows and
Solaris servers. Master is Solaris 10. Most of them
are in the same segment. I want to set up and test BMR
for 2 Solaris machines and 1 windows 2003 server(they
are in the same subnet as my master).
Do you have a simple one or two page procedur
I got a question for you all.
So what is a big deal about BMR anyway? I thought its just a glorified
Jumpstart.
Alex
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS COMMUNICATION AND ANY ATTACHMENTS HERETO IS
CONFIDENTIAL, MAY BE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED, AND IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE
PERSONAL AND CONFI
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/24/2006
04:04:10 PM:
> I got a question for you all.
>
> So what is a big deal about BMR anyway? I thought its just a
> glorified Jumpstart.
You can do most of the same with Solaris with a Jumpstart
and a flash archive.
BMR customizes Jumpstart but you don't need
Actually, it works for windows and other os's as well, unlike jumpstart.
It will make a point-in-time image of a bootable OS for several different
operating systems from the same BMR server. That's a bigger trick in the
Windows world that most UNIX/Linux variants, I admit.
And the problem of reco
Hello everybody,
I am running NBU 5.1 MP4 environment with 4 media serves and a master all on W2K3. All my media servers are clusters and we want to take down the current master and replace it with new and improved cluster. Any suggestions as to the best way to do this? I need to get an idea of the
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 05:04:10PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> So what is a big deal about BMR anyway? I thought its just a glorified
> Jumpstart.
BMR restores your entire system to the state of the last backup,
including all fulls and incrementals that have run since you originally
jumpsta
On 3/24/06, Sander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tim Berger wrote (ao):>Agreed. 70MB/sec writes is disappointing but acceptable for my>requirements. On a fast cpu machine you'll see better performance>with software raid. That's normal. There's lots of other reasons to
>go with 3war
--- Jim Peppas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Can anyone tell me what kind of speed do you get
> when duplicating?
>
> I have a lib with LTO2 drives. When duplicating from
> disk, I get around
> 15Mb/sec. When duplicating from tape about
> 25Mb/sec.
>
> What your speeds?
>
> Thanks
20 matches
Mail list logo
