I spoke to Veritas shortly after sending my email to the list, and they
report that in version 6.0, it is supported, but "difficult". The
engineer is running through it in their lab a couple of different ways
before giving me the procedure. I'll send a general description to the
list after I get it
perhaps examine the output from:
bppllist -U -L
And, from the client, with logging set to 5
(bp.conf VERBOSE = 5)
the /usr/openv/netbackup/logs/bpbkar and bpcd log files.
It will give an indication of how it is choosing the paths to follow.
We use the ALL_LOCAL_DRIVES (w/o cross mount points,
Actually Tristan you should be able to do the following. Ask Veritas
about it then let me know if you will.
Since 6.0 uses and EMM server you can have multiple Masters in the same
environment.
I would build the new Master Server and Media server environment
using the existing EMM server
Hi Chris
Thanks for responding. The documentation implies that the Cross Mount
Points is a UNIX specific parameter and also says not to use it with the
ALL_LOCAL_DRIVES directive. I guess you may end up with two copies of
all local drives if you do that!
If it is UNIX specific though I wonder wh
Is Cross Mount Points selected [policy attribute]?
hth
--Chris
Hi, we have a number of Windows servers that have SAN attached disk
drives. The ALL_LOCAL_DRIVES directive does not back up these drives
so I assume we have to explicitly include them in a policy (we don't
have the SAN media
Hi, we have a number of Windows servers that have
SAN attached disk drives. The ALL_LOCAL_DRIVES directive does not back up these
drives so I assume we have to explicitly include them in a policy (we don't have
the SAN media server option).
The documentation (6.0) for ALL_LOCAL_DRIVES sa
Does anyone have a suggestion for the following scenario that avoids the
difficulties in renaming a NB Master server?
We're upgrading, our old environment looks like this:
Server 1:
Solaris 8
Samba File Server
Netbackup 6.0mp2 Master Server.
HVD SCSI DLT7000 Librar
"A terminal server must be in install mode before you can install a program."
Anyone get this?
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
C:\Documents and Settings\user>change user /install
User session is ready to install applications.
C:\Documents and Settings\user>
Success
On 4/20/06, Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "A terminal server must be in install mode before you can install a program."
>
> Anyone get this?
>
Greg
My opinion is that both products work well
if:
-
The backups solution is
architected correctly – Hardware and software sizing and configurations
must be accurate and account for growth
-
The administrators are
well educated in the use of the solution
I ha
Hi Justin
Ok, well I would have thought that would work. What worries me a little is
the comment about new drives - Are they already in your production
environemnt? Does Netbackup know about them?
Truth is, I am not sure if this can be done, without some additional steps -
like creating a new sto
FORCE_MEDIA_SERVER entry in bp.conf would be sufficient for the same
drives on another media server in the same SSO config. By "newer and
cleaner" drives it sounds as if you're using a different storage unit so
I'm not sure what that would require.
The entry in bp.conf would be:
FORCE_RESTORE_ME
This MediaServerB - Is it already IN place and knows about the Master Server
in your environment?
Regards
Simon Weaver
3rd Line Technical Support
Windows Domain Administrator
EADS Astrium Limited, B32AA IM (DCS)
Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Mes
Had a quick question, I have a backup that was done on mediaserverA, I
would like to restore it from mediaserverB, attached to perhaps newer
and "cleaner" tape drives, how would I go about doing this? Do I need
to move images around, make a FORCE_MEDIA_SERVER entry in bp.conf, or?
Greg
TSM is *very* different to NBU. One big difference is that it works on
a forever-incremental methodology. Although I believe these days it is
able to work in a Full/Incremental fashion as NBU does, just as NBU is
now able to do synthetic backups, which is similar to TSM.
There's also a fairl
Guys, thanks for all the help.
This is our Netbackup test server. So we decided
to reinstall Netbackup. After that now Netbackup do see the robot.
I do not know why? maybe it was a conflict some where along
the first time we configure and did not know it.
Anyway, in my case we reinstall Netbackup
Right thats great. As often i looked into it way too deep.
Cheers
Hansen, Heiko, VF EITO wrote:
> Right. And the backup will fail with exit code 73 ("bpstart_notify failed").
>
> Heiko
>
> --
> Vodafone Information Systems GmbH
> Storage Management (VIS-THDS)
> Dipl.-Ing. Heiko Hansen
> Rehhecke
Hi All
A drive has ben replaced in our SSO environment , one cluster is picking up the
right drive serial number however ther other two clusters are not .
Using vmglob is there a way to change the serial number only of a drive or must
the the incorrect drives ben deleted the added back in again?
For me, creating a separate filesystem for /usr/openv/netbackup/db is the first task of any NetBackup master server installation. Symbolic links work fine here. In my opinion the install script should warn you that putting the catalog in the / filesystem is a bad idea.
Preferably this filesystem
Hi ,
How to do restore for oracle form the Backup,archive,restore
form the master server , because the restore icon is always hidden . but from client we can do restore
normally and succefully.
Best Regards
---
20 matches
Mail list logo
