Anybody got problems backing up Windows 2003 64 Bit Edition?
All of my Shadow copy component backups end with Status 1.
5.1 MP5 on Master and 5.1 MP5 64 Bit Client on Opteron Client
10.05.2006 07:29:05 - started process bpbrm (9164)
10.05.2006 07:29:05 - connecting
10.05.2006 07:29:05 -
Dear Admins,
I have just started with netbackup administration, the TEST backup fired for a windows 2003 server exits with error 13.
As its network read error, we checked the network settings and found to be 1000 Gbps auto.
The Event logs show the following error
Faulting application
0n Fri, May 12, 2006 at 06:05:11PM +0100, WEAVER, Simon wrote:
Bob
although sounds ok, the only drawback I see is:
1) People will forget to post a resolution
I agree. Sunmanagers and Tru64managers are run like this. _many_ people do not
end up posting their
Hello Ian,
The story that I received was that there are several things going on. I believe
that it is covered in a technote.
But in summary, if you do not have an Administrator email address set to
anything, the email will go to the root userid on the master.
And due to a bug in the code
Title: Bpsched crashing
Nb 5.0 mp6 Solaris 9
We are having an on going issue with bpsched crashing/stopping. When this happens all the jobs go 150. Sometimes it recovers and restarts the jobs and other times we have to stop and start the services. Has any one else had this issues and what
This happens in 5.0 mp6 as well. I have this same issue. Very annoying.
Greg
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Len Boyle
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 8:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE:
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 09:03:44AM -0400, Hindle, Greg wrote:
Nb 5.0 mp6 Solaris 9
We are having an on going issue with bpsched crashing/stopping. When
this happens all the jobs go 150. Sometimes it recovers and restarts the
jobs and other times we have to stop and start the services. Has
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 09:35:57AM -0400, Martin, Jonathan (Contractor) wrote:
The below suggestions are VERY VALID and I would definitely try them -
and I also have had success with those steps. I just wanted to add that
I've also had success with.
1 - Upgrade your NIC drives to the
I realize this is more of a philosophical question and apologize in
advance.
After auditing a few backup servers for a couple of weeks now, I've come
to realize that if a certain weekly backup job fails on any given day,
and I re-run it manually during the day/week following that it does not
Title: Bpsched crashing
Good Morning Greg,
Have you changed setting in the /etc/system file to
increased things such as shared memory and msg queues?
len
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hindle,
GregSent: Monday, May 15, 2006 9:04 AMTo:
Hi Jonathan,
We added the following to our bp.conf and it solved the issue:
#
# Jobs are requeued instead of error 219.
QUEUE_ON_ERROR
Similarly, we added this so to solve the STU issue (we have several STUs
here):
#
# active jobs that get stu unavailable will be re-queued.
WAIT_IN_QUEUE
The overwhelming response was to keep the present structure.
However, there were also concerns to keep the chatter down by:
1) encouraging sending thank you to individuals as opposed to the entire group.
2) eliminate "I don't know" replies to the group address
3) reduce the number of replies to
Regarding the thread going around concerning bpsched crashing, I believe I'm having similar issues and as such will begin thinking upgrade. I'm currently running on HP-UX, but our general direction for new apps lately has been solaris.
Anyone got an opinion as to whether I should stay on HPUX
Why?
I have a 2-3TB backup that I do not have another 2-3TB box to restore
to. If I can restore to /dev/null, then I could test a restore and
the tapes integrity.
And if it does not verify all the data on the tape, how come it takes
~2hrs for each LTO2 tape?
Justin.
On 5/15/06, Steve [EMAIL
I have used both of your solutions before and wanted to add some info that I have found. If I am using Freq. based schedules I always set my Freq to be just larger than the backup window to try and avoid problems like this. For example on Weekly backups that are open all day Sat (24 hours) I set
Ive run Netbackup on HP-UX for
years and dont see many major issues. Ive also run it on Solaris
though it has been a while since I did that. It always seemed to have more
issues on Solaris than HP-UX though once properly configured it seemed to be
acceptable on Solaris. There just seems to
If you duplicate the tapes, it will also test their integrity. If the
images are unreadable in a Dup process, the process should fail.
~Kate
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin
Piszcz
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 10:24 AM
To: Steve
Cc:
Justin,
Yes, I zoned my tape library on the Brocade switch and that's why the host
can see the library and its first drive. I put the library and NBU master in
a separate WWN-based zone. Is there any other special zoning method I should
be aware of?
Thanks.
- Young
-Original
If your running Solaris, you could try the 'tcopy' command.
From the man pages -
NAME
tcopy - copy a magnetic tape
SYNOPSIS
tcopy source [destination]
DESCRIPTION
The tcopy utility copies the magnetic tape mounted on the
tape drive specified by the source
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 10:12:46AM -0400, Steve Jenkins wrote:
Regarding the thread going around concerning bpsched crashing, I
believe I'm having similar issues and as such will begin thinking
upgrade. I'm currently running on HP-UX, but our general direction
for new apps lately has been
All the problems I had (initially) w/ fiber zoning was my initial
setup of the brocade switch. After that you just use the cfgadm
commands and be on your way.
Justin.
On 5/15/06, Song, Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Justin,
Yes, I zoned my tape library on the Brocade switch and that's
Yes, with frequency based scheduling, keeping the frequency as small as
possible (yet larger than your window is expected to be) will let you do
a manual retry the next day without adversely affecting the backup next
week.
However, during the past year I have become a fan of calendar based
If you don't like the engine touted in technote 282968 below, you can still access the Boolean search engine at this link:
http://seer.support.veritas.com/NAV_BAR/clustersearch.asp?ddProduct=NBUESVRcrumb=on
New Search Solution from Symantec Enterprise Technical Services
Len,
This message means that you have some device in the path to your
tape drive that isn't happy with 16-byte CDBs (some scsi-3 commands).
This one in particular is the scsi-3 WRITE ATTRIBUTE command.
(Reference: http://t10.org/ftp/t10/drafts/spc4/spc4r04.pdf)
George
On Sat, 13 May 2006, Len
Title: Tapes keep freezing
When using Veritas Netbackup 6.0 my tapes keep freezing after one backup. The tapes still have plenty of space. If I unfreeze the tapes and do a new policy and schedule the backups it will again only do one backup and freeze my tapes.
Title: Tapes keep freezing
Hello Abel,
What messages are you seeing in the bptm log for these
tapes?
len
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vasquez,
Abel - BLS CTRSent: Monday, May 15, 2006 3:33 PMTo:
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu]
Title: Message
Guys
Reloaded my Robotic Library with brand new tapes. One
of my SAN Media Servers had this event logged in its activity monitor. This job
has multiple streams
12/05/2006 20:51:43 - mounting
0204L312/05/2006 20:51:51 - started process bpbrm (4116)12/05/2006
20:51:51 -
27 matches
Mail list logo
