Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1: Backup stalls

2007-01-20 Thread Alexander Skwar
ยท Carlos Alberto Lima dos Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Alexander, > > I already had a similar problem, and the problem was related with > the fact of the archive file is open in the moment of the snap. Hm, no, that's not the issue here. Oracle was shut down and it doesn't always

[Veritas-bu] Poll: Who is running ACSLS (SL500/STK8500/etc) with 6.0 MP4?

2007-01-20 Thread Justin Piszcz
How stable has it been? ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Poll: Who is running ACSLS (SL500/STK8500/etc) with6.0 MP4?

2007-01-20 Thread Hampus Lind
We are planning to go to 6.0 MP4 in a couple of weeks.. Accruing to our Sym guys there will bee no problem with ACSLS as long you are on a fairly new version.. Have you found out otherwise? Hampus Lind Rikspolisstyrelsen National Police Board Tel dir: +46 (0)8 - 401 99 43 Tel mob: +46 (0)70 -

Re: [Veritas-bu] Poll: Who is running ACSLS (SL500/STK8500/etc) with6.0 MP4?

2007-01-20 Thread Justin Piszcz
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, Hampus Lind wrote: > We are planning to go to 6.0 MP4 in a couple of weeks.. > > Accruing to our Sym guys there will bee no problem with ACSLS as long you > are on a fairly new version.. > > Have you found out otherwise? > > > Hampus Lind > Rikspolisstyrelsen > National

Re: [Veritas-bu] Poll: Who is running ACSLS (SL500/STK8500/etc) with6.0 MP4?

2007-01-20 Thread Scott Jacobson
I'm also interested in knowing these comments as well. My most stable NetBackup to date: NBU 5.1 w/MP4 ACSLS 7.1 with all the current patches: PTF809236S PTF814256S PTF843640S PTF843843S PTF843889S PTF844161S PTF844398S PTF845690S PTF847481S As mentioned in an earlier thread, if you using Lib

Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1: Backup stalls

2007-01-20 Thread Darren Dunham
> > Hi. > > I'm using NBU 5.1 to backup a few Solaris servers. Since recently, > I'm experiencing problems with the backup. Specifically, on one > server, the backup just stalls (at the last file?). Ie. it just > doesn't go on. > > Eg. right now, it hangs at: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ ls -lah