Hi
We have an exchange client that for some reason is backing up it
mailboxes very slow. We know that mailboxes is by nature slow, but this
servers is REALLY slow. Under 1 MB per stream. Because it is a virtual
machine, it is backed up as a client. (Should have been a media server
due to its s
Paul
RTFM ? I did mention you need to read the Admin Guides?
sorry ... was not sure if your reply was aimed at me or the originator ?
Clarify?
Regards
Simon Weaver
3rd Line Technical Support
Windows Domain Administrator
EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)
Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5P
Hi All,
We are using Netbackup 5.1MP6 on Solaris 9.
H/W Detasils :
Master/Media Server : v440, 4CPU, 16Gb RAM
Tape Library : L500, 4 F-CAL Drive (LTO Gen 2)
Network Speed : 1GBPS
Tape library is directly connected to server.
Currently when trying to take backup of local server i
am getting 22Mbp
Hi Ram,
did you do /usr/openv/volmgr/bin/sgscan this inbuild scan command from
Veritas scans for tape drives. This should definitely show the drives, else
recheck the connectivity, patches etc. Once done you can use
/usr/openv/volmgr/bin/tpconfig to configure robot & tape drives
Regards
Sami Ab
Multiple retentions per volume is a global parameter in 5.1 that is only on
the master. It would be nice if it were a media server option, but in 5.1
it is global.
If it were a media server option, then both sides of the aisle would be
happy.
Bobby Williams
2205 Peterson Drive
Chattanooga, Te
I'm building a new NBU 5.1 MP6 master/media server on Solaris 10. I have a
3-disk RAID volume for the catalog and I'd like to use ZFS with RAID-Z. This
is what I got from tech support:
"The ZFS file system is supported as long as the OS which it is running on is
supported and correct patch
Is anybody doing host side LUN masking on Solaris boxes with the
leadville driver?
F'rinstance:
Library with multiple SCSI tape drives + robot and an single connected
FC-SCSI bridge.
The bridge presents 4 tape drives and robot as 5 LUNs on a single WWN,
connected to the fabric
You want one med
Granted, you are correct and the opposite could also be true. My 5 year backup
could start on the last part of tape number one, fill tape number 2 and part of
number 3. That would be terribly inefficient given that yes, I'm now offsiting
three tapes instead of two. That has to be managed, and
1) How does Veritas license SSO? Is it based on tape drives?
You need to have a SSO license on each server that will be using the
shared storage.
2) Does each master/media server that will be sharing the tape drives
need an individual SSO license, or one single SSO license is needed and
can be i
You do realize that the opposite is true, in that by allowing mixed
retentions in this way, you are also allowing as little as a few block
of 5 year retention data to be written to the end of a 400Gig tape full
of 2-3 week retention data.
So that Tape which could go back to scratch after 2 weeks i
Hi All
Needed help in configuring the ADIC library on one of our Solaris 9.0
running Netbackup 5.1 master server
Need to know is the configuration of the ADIC library is different from
the normal TLD library , do we need to select the TSM robot for
configuring the library.
pls suggest
R
Whoa there tiger. Keeping different retentions on different volume
polls is NOT the way to go IMO. If you have 20 GB of data that must be
kept offsite for infinity you are already losing 1 tape "forever," why
not put more data on it? Sure, you could keep that tape in the bot and
keep writing to
Greg
Im running 6 MP4 and i have no problems backing up my personal desktop running
XP Pro w/ SP2
Anas
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Koster, Phil
Sent: Mon 2/26/2007 8:04 AM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external); Hindle, Greg; NB List Mail
Subject: Re: [Veritas
Turns out the fix for the hanging backups we were experiencing with the
latest Solaris 10 patch cluster with NBU5.1MP6 were indeed related to
the ip:do_tcp_fusion kernel parameter. Although Sun claims this bug was
fixed in 118833-24, it still exists in 118833-36. The suggestion was to
turn it off a
Hi,
I have a tapeLibrary Sunstore C4 connected to SAN Switch, The QL HBA
card Driver is also Installed in Solaris 9.0 Machice and also checked the tape
driver is detected or not by using command luxadm probe.. It displays with WWN
detected with tape drive
I
You can put in an exclude on the server to exclude that folder:
I think its like
c:\windows\systems32\ntsmdata
There is a technote on Veritas's website that you can either disable the
service or exclude it...
I just excluded it
Regards,
-cj
Courtenay Jones
This is a MAJOR case of RTFM.
Sugar coated advice is nice, but nobody should be running a production
Netbackup environment without reading the application vendor's
documentation on how to actually backup and restore the master server.
Paul
--
-Original Message-
Fro
Also IIRC, in order to run the (non-JAVA) Windows console, you must have
local admin rights on the PC you're running it on.
Not just to install it, but to actually connect to the master after the
admin consoel is installed.
Paul
SImon,
AFAIK, you can do w
Works for us with NBU 6 SP4. We have two XP Pro boxes we back up that
way. Works just like any other Windows server would.
I think there is a client edition but since we are only doing this to
two boxes (one of which is actually an internal web & Real server) we
just used server licenses for
We do ALL LOCAL DRIVES on our master from our master. Win2K with NBU 6
MP4. Just exclude the NBU directories that have the catalog information
in them and do a separate catalog back up job. We do the ALL LOCAL at 3
PM (our backup Windows starts at 5 P) and we do the catalog back up at 9
AM.
Ph
We are hardeneing the Solaris os and need to know the
minimum packages required or how to determine the list
pf Solaris packages required to run NetBAckup v6.0 as
Master.
Cheers
Michael
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best sp
Hi Mike
Sure its Java ? Its just that I have the JAVA version and the "desktop"
version installed on 2 different machines, and they both behave very, very
differently (ie: 1 is 10 times faster !)
Regards
Simon Weaver
3rd Line Technical Support
Windows Domain Administrator
EADS Astrium Limi
On 2/26/2007 3:32 AM, chodhetz wrote:
> I have volume pool test_pool, then I have 2 backup policies for 1
> client they are policy_test_A and policy_test_B. those backup
> policies take tapes from test_pool. But policy_test_A have retention
> 1 week and policy_test_B have retention 1 month so in s
The Windows admin console is written in Java. It's not a native binary.
It does lag, but you may be able to boost it a bit if you tune your JVM.
-- M
"WEAVER, Simon (external)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
02/26/2007 02:21 AM
To
"'Mike L. Varney'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn
On 2/26/2007 3:51 AM, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> There is an option (off by default) in which one tape can use multiple
> retentions, but I would not recommend it.
>
> If you have a 20MB file that is infinite retention and the rest of an
> LTO2/3 tape as 1 month retention, it will become confusing,
Hi,
I am having issues backing up the Public Folders in Exchange 2003 with
Netbackup 5.1 MP3.
When I start the Netbackup GUI it only lists 4 out of many public folders to
be backed up.
Note: I applied document 279774 but still have the same problem.
Any help would be appreciated.
--
DLew97
___
1. Sounds like you have mis-matched tape/storage units. Either use all
LTO2 or all LTO3 for everything, otherwise you need to make sure your
storage units and groups only correspond to the media they back up to.
LTO2->LTO2 LTO3->LTO3 for example.
2. Read the NetBackup manual for System Adminis
Dear Justin Piszcz
Thanx for your attention
My next question that ...
1. is it possible error status 84 & 96 because of
multiple retention in one
volume pool ?. ... I backup my database with retention
1 month and archive
log with retention 1 week in same volume pool ? ... I
always found those
pr
There is an option (off by default) in which one tape can use multiple
retentions, but I would not recommend it.
If you have a 20MB file that is infinite retention and the rest of an
LTO2/3 tape as 1 month retention, it will become confusing, yes?
Keep different retentions with separate volume
Dear all
I have volume pool test_pool, then I have 2 backup
policies for 1 client
they are policy_test_A and policy_test_B. those backup
policies take tapes
from test_pool. But policy_test_A have retention 1
week and policy_test_B
have retention 1 month so in same volume pool I have 2
different re
Guys
On a NBU 5.1 MP5 Master / Media Setup and a AD client MP5 5.1 Client I see
the following logged
26/02/2007 02:46:53 - Warning bpbrm(pid=6616) from client : WRN
- Removable Storage Management: unable to export database (WIN32 21: Unknown
error)
26/02/2007 02:46:53 - Error bpbrm(pid=6616) fro
31 matches
Mail list logo
