By no means is this a big deal.
In the Backup and Restore gui, what happens when you "preview media" when
the primary copy is located on a dssu? Do you get an error?
Our master is running 6.0MP4 on Solaris 10. I tried the preview with jnbSA
on the master, backup and restore on the client, and a
I use a STK FLX210 (EOL) SATA array for my DSSU, but I'm using NBU
5.1MP4 and LTO2. I have no trouble maxing out LTO2 with a 3+1 RAID-5
on SATA, although the MAX_STAGING_JOBS and STAGING_JOB_KB_LIMIT
certainly helped.
As for the failed images not getting cleaned up, I have noticed that
*most*
If you did not install the Java console then no you should not install
the Java patch. Please clarify the issue for me, is Qualys giving
positives on ALL NetBackup installations about the bpjava-msvc or is it
only giving those positives on the NBU Admin console machines?
Thank you
Mike Heck
---
Are you referring to the java admin console which is a separate
installation on a windows client?
If you do not install the java admin console, should you still install
the patch for it?
>>> "Mike Heck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/1/2007 2:01 PM >>>
Hello all,
Am I reading this thread correctly, in th
Hello all,
Am I reading this thread correctly, in that the issue revolves around
the NetBackup Java UI for Windows? If so could those getting the
Positives from Qualys please double check the install of the for Java
Patch?
The Java Patches for all of the platforms are separate from the primary
Ne
Daniel,
>From the client you can run "bpclntcmd -ip [ master server's ip address] to
check if the client resolves the master server name correctly then from the
master server run the same command with the troubled client's ip address to
verify the ip resolve correctly.
Edwin,
(Sorry for the delayed response!)
I have a few comments for you:
Due to the integration of BMR into NBU 6.0, much of the work you had to do with
previous versions of BMR is now gone. The BMR database is covered by the NBU
catalog backup. Nothing special needs to be done to handle the B
Hi,
Can you give us more informations ??
I need to implement the VmWare consolidated backup on Netbackup an I'm really a
beginner on the VmWare environment.
Is there a specific Symantec documentation on how to implement the intrface
between VmWare and NetBackup ?? I found some VmWare documents
The only thing that screams at me from below is the NetApp 3020.
Since the 3020 is, AFAIK, a NAS filer (At least the one I have is), are
you saying that the 3020 is mounting the LUNs from the the Arrays and
then the Windows media server is using CIFs shares from the NetApp as
DSSUs?
If that's t
Looking into this as we speak !
Sounds good! Does work on 5,1 and 6.0
You need win2k3 (Hooray!) as your VCB Proxy Server :-)
Regards
Simon Weaver
3rd Line Technical Support
Windows Domain Administrator
EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)
Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU
Email: [EMAIL PRO
The response I got from symantec is that the vulnerability has been
resolved and that they are not responsible for other companies'
software.
I don't know what Qualys response is because I am not a customer. I
asked our security group (the customer) to obtain an official response
from Qualys.
>>>
Dear All,
Which one the best clean drive using NetBackup or usingTape Cleaning function
from Library ?...
Now I clean drive from my library and not from netbackup,but I always received
message from netbackup that drive never clean tape.
I want to touch file NO_TAPEALERT but I afraid that l
We're using Dell MD1000s direct attached to 3 media servers w/ 14 SATAII 500GB
Disks in a Raid 5 setup. I'm easily able to write to them at 200MB/sec+ and I
can drive LTO3s (compressed) to 120MB/sec. I occasionally look through the log
files and see less than full LTO3 capacity during duplicat
On 2/28/2007 10:34 PM, Anthony Segran wrote:
> /Is SATA a common choice out there for DSSU's?
We use FATA drives - not much difference between them and SATA really.
> //We experienced slow performance during duplication, on both HDS 9585
> arrays and NetApp 3020 over FCP. We're currently talking
In general I agree.
However, it is best to only use FQDN for the majority of the time. The
problem is for (UNIX anyway) you can only have 6 domains in
/etc/resolv.conf, after that, short-names won't work anymore if you _rely_
on DNS for the naming resolution.
If you are in an enclosed environ
Okay guys, lets not go changing to FQDN and say it makes NetBackup happy.
NetBackup is happy with non-FQDN's, very happy. It is the admins that are
happy with FQDN's.
Fix DNS, have system admins do it correctly. Don't change the backup
environment because some system admins can't understand DNS
16 matches
Mail list logo
