Re: [Veritas-bu] Sharepoint (MOSS) 2007 Document Level Backups

2008-10-08 Thread Michael Graff Andersen
Hi Simon I can drill down in the BAR GUI, after getting the password issue and other things solved Now the supporter tells me that you can't do single document restore under shared services, so now I regard the MOSS agent as not working. Can't do single document restore and can't restore the

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup performance numbers for gigabit with without jumbo frames ?

2008-10-08 Thread Justin Piszcz
On Wed, 8 Oct 2008, Michael Graff Andersen wrote: It this with jumbo frames enabled ? 2008/10/8 Justin Piszcz [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Wed, 8 Oct 2008, Michael Graff Andersen wrote: Hello All Do anybody have Netbackup backup numbers for gigabit with without jumbo frames implemented ?

[Veritas-bu] Netbackup performance numbers for gigabit with without jumbo frames ?

2008-10-08 Thread Michael Graff Andersen
Hello All Do anybody have Netbackup backup numbers for gigabit with without jumbo frames implemented ? Regards Michael ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup performance numbers for gigabit with without jumbo frames ?

2008-10-08 Thread Wilkinson, Alex
0n Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 08:53:22AM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote: Without jumbo frames only-- with gigabit, I believe you will see less CPU utilization using jumbo frames, but there are other problems to it-- for hosts that do not utilize jumbo frames vs. ones that do you may get

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup performance numbers for gigabit with without jumbo frames ?

2008-10-08 Thread Michael Graff Andersen
It this with jumbo frames enabled ? 2008/10/8 Justin Piszcz [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Wed, 8 Oct 2008, Michael Graff Andersen wrote: Hello All Do anybody have Netbackup backup numbers for gigabit with without jumbo frames implemented ? Sure, I maxed it out at ~127-137MiB/s for LTO-3

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup performance numbers for gigabit with without jumbo frames ?

2008-10-08 Thread Justin Piszcz
On Wed, 8 Oct 2008, Michael Graff Andersen wrote: Hello All Do anybody have Netbackup backup numbers for gigabit with without jumbo frames implemented ? Sure, I maxed it out at ~127-137MiB/s for LTO-3 using 100% compressible data, e.g., AA. Average though for compressed

Re: [Veritas-bu] Command to Produce client and version

2008-10-08 Thread Travis Kelley
Here's a little snippit of code we use to grab client versions. You can wrap this in whatever you want. We have it outputting to an HTML page that we can quickly reference to see all our client versions. /usr/openv/netbackup/bin/admincmd/bptestbpcd -host $CLIENT -verbose /tmp/testbpcdoutput

Re: [Veritas-bu] Command to Produce client and version

2008-10-08 Thread Jackson, Todd
Thank you Ed ! From: Ed Wilts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 10:56 AM To: Jackson, Todd Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Command to Produce client and version On a Solaris master, we use a combination

Re: [Veritas-bu] Command to Produce client and version

2008-10-08 Thread Ed Wilts
On a Solaris master, we use a combination of a shell script and awk to produce a csv file with the versions. I'll paste the scripts here and leave it as an exercise for the reader on how to convert this to Windows. When this runs, it needs to contact each client so it's not really quick.

[Veritas-bu] Command to Produce client and version

2008-10-08 Thread Jackson, Todd
Hello All, Does anyone know which command and flags to use to produce a list Of clients and the version of netbackup they are running from the command line? I want to produce something similar to Host Properties Clients Properties With less fields. Using netbackup 6.0 Windows Master Thanks

Re: [Veritas-bu] Command to Produce client and version

2008-10-08 Thread netbackup
Try the bpcoverage command Hello All, Does anyone know which command and flags to use to produce a list Of clients and the version of netbackup they are running from the command line? I want to produce something similar to Host Properties Clients Properties With less fields. Using netbackup

Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 30, Issue 14

2008-10-08 Thread durrantj
Hi I am currently out of the office and will return on Monday 13th October. I will respond to your email then. Thankyou ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Backing up clustered virtual hostnames on SAN[...]

2008-10-08 Thread bob944
Up to and including NBU 5.1, we backed up clustered applications on HP Serviceguard clusters, Sun clusters and even MS clusters using the same method. Each of the physical cluster nodes was an NBU SAN Media Server, with it's own storage unit(s), but we would also define a storage unit for

[Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5.2A Sol10 x86 bpdbm issue

2008-10-08 Thread swormley
We have a Solaris 10 x86 master server(formerly Sol 9 Sparc) which is unable to backup our largest filesystem(7TB, 180 million files) over NDMP. It appears that bpdbm is hitting a 4GB limit of some kind because the backup is failing with the following error in the bpdbm log: 21:36:38.010

[Veritas-bu] Exchange 07 Restore issues

2008-10-08 Thread Klebba, Don
We have a Exchange 07 cluster that we¹re backing up using CCR and backing up the passive node using VSS. We finally got some successfully backups, and now we want to test some restores before we start moving Live mailboxes to this cluster. When we do the restore we get the following error.

[Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5 New upgrade woes

2008-10-08 Thread jeclark59
here is a tech note that help me http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/279554.htm +-- |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Veritas-bu] Exchange 07 Restore issues

2008-10-08 Thread Pedro Moranga Gonçalves
Did you follow this article ? http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/297412.htm Renaming the Storage Group is necessary. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Klebba, Don Sent: quarta-feira, 8 de outubro de 2008 16:26 To: