bpduplicate -help
Regards,
Patrick Whelan
VERITAS Certified NetBackup Support Engineer for UNIX.
VERITAS Certified NetBackup Support Engineer for Windows.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of nguytom
Sent: 24 November 2008
Imran,
NetBackup 6.5.3 is available today through the First Availability
program. It will be available on the support web-site around the first
week of December.
-Steve
From: Khan Imran A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2008 6:08 PM
To: Steve Hedberg
Cc: veritas
So far so good. Windows 2003 SP2 Environment with 1 Master/Media and
another Media server writing to LT03 drives.
Pros
Installed without issue
Fixed Issue with admin Console not refreshing automatically. (Formerly
fixed by Refresh All)
First weekend of full backups completed without issue.
Con
This is also explained in the Commands Guide *VERY* well.
Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪ Sr. Storage Engineer ▪ SunGard
Availability Services ▪ 757 N. Eldridge Suite 200, Houston TX 77079 ▪
281-584-4693
Keeping People and Information Connected® ▪
http://availability.sungard.com/
P Think before
Has anyone experienced slower backups after the 6.0 MP5 to 6.5.2
upgrade? All Windows clients are still running 6.0 MP5 and in most
cases, backups are taking twice as long as before. I have been getting
numerous 196's every morning since the upgrade last week. Will
upgrading the clients improve
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008, Randy Samora wrote:
> Has anyone experienced slower backups after the 6.0 MP5 to 6.5.2
> upgrade? All Windows clients are still running 6.0 MP5 and in most
> cases, backups are taking twice as long as before. I have been getting
> numerous 196's every morning since the upg
I am upgrading a handful of clients now that run Full backups every
night. On one hand I really do want to find the fix, but on the other
hand, I'm not looking forward to trying to upgrade 700 clients before
Thanksgiving :)
Thanks for the response, Justin. I will post an update.
-Original M
I know what the PBX service does but when my Exchange admin saw it on his box,
he got worried. The PBX service also seems to be cluster aware and that made
him even more nervous. He’s asking if the service can be removed?
Is there any extra load on the client or any reason the service shoul
Randy,
I opened a case on this to verify. I disable it on non-clustered clients but it
is required, as you know, on media servers.
Regards
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Randy Samora
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 11:06 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.au
My Exchange servers are not media servers so that resolves that issue. If
nothing else, I’ll disable the service and see what happens.
Thank you all for the responses. This always seems to be quicker than opening
a call. I’m not bad-mouthing the Symantec tech support because they have save
By "feasible" I don't mean "can you do it" I mean "can you do it in such
a way so that performance is reasonable". The system that I'm running
NOM on is going away so I need to find a new home for it and running it
on a VM would be a nice and easy replacement.
Thanks,
Jamie Jamison
My question is what's option of bpduplicate to duplicate the tape
pwhelan0610 wrote:
> bpduplicate -help
>
> Regards,
>
> Patrick Whelan
> VERITAS Certified NetBackup Support Engineer for UNIX.
> VERITAS Certified NetBackup Support Engineer for Windows.
>
> netbackup < at > whelan-consulting
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 8:40 PM, JAJA (Jamie Jamison) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> By "feasible" I don't mean "can you do it" I mean "can you do it in such
> a way so that performance is reasonable". The system that I'm running NOM on
> is going away so I need to find a new home for it and running
Hi
You really should at least have a look at the Commands manual to see all the
options available. That is how we all learned.
Why not use the GUI (Catalog -> Duplicate)? The Admin Guide also explains the
Duplicate option nicely. The main thing to remember is that you should always
duplicate t
My experience with NOM on Solaris revealed it to be quite a memory hog.
If giving your VM NOM environment a pile of ram in VMware is acceptable
(+2GB?), then you might have a winning combination. With Vmware, you
might get some of that physical ram back if you use the vmware tools and
hope for th
15 matches
Mail list logo