After thinking about it I decided to trying running the bpmedia -unfreeze
on each of the SAN servers for each tape
I was going to suggest that. When you run the bpmedialist command, it
should tell you which media server owns that tape. And I have seen a
situation where more than one media
Rather than bpexpdate, I meant bpmedia -unfreeze, as you said.
Duh.
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Dean dean.de...@gmail.com wrote:
After thinking about it I decided to trying running the bpmedia -unfreeze
on each of the SAN servers for each tape
I was going to suggest that. When you run
Hello all,
I am working with Veritas Netbackup 4.5 Data Center and I'm faced with a
problem.
We have a pack of written tapes (multiplexing mode use when backing up)
that contain only a few kb of data.
As we are running out of tapes, I'd like to know how it is possible to
duplicate the content of
By the way many of the commands have a -h host option. You don't
have to go to the various hosts - you can just add the flag and issue
the command from the master for each of your media servers.
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Dean wrote:
After thinking about it I decided to trying running the bpmedia
-unfreeze on each of the SAN servers for each tape
I was going to suggest that. When you run the bpmedialist command,
it should tell you which media server owns that tape. And I have
seen a situation where
Jeff,
I guess my main problem is getting too old to remember the SAN servers
have their own media management database that has to be dealt with also
:-) Know that I know how to find which tapes belong to which servers I
could do that now. The big hammer and shotgun approach just seems to
NetBackup does not duplicate tapes. It only duplicates images.
Use bpimagelist to determine the names of the images on the tapes.
Then use bpduplicate to make copies of the images on a new tape.
Bob Stump
Fidelity National Information Services
-Original Message-
From:
I am configuring VCB backups for NBU 6.5.3, for
FlashBackup-Windows policy, there are 4 options for backup
types under Snapshot Client Options. These are
0 - File
1 - FullVM
2 - Mapped FullVM
3 - FullVM and File for Incrementals
From reading the docs, Option 3 - FullVM and File for
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 04:12:53PM +0100,
david.eg...@external.thalesaleniaspace.com wrote:
For instance :
images on :
MEDIA001 : server A image volume 7kb
MEDIA001 : server B image volume 8kb
MEDIA002 : server C image volume 5kb
I aim to get all images from MEDIA001 onto MEDIA002,
We have all our tape drives (20) assigned to all our media servers (3
main ones, and ~45 that server as SAN media servers, backing only
themselves up).
Dealing with tape drive throughput issues and we've had a Brocade
support person tell us that this setup is not ideal and that even when a
tape
My setup is the same, all drives to all servers.
If you are using a drive and the SAN media server is not in need of a
second one, why would it keep scanning all the drives?
I have had drives go down for some reason or another, but it only goes
down on a media server that tried to use it.
I've had the exact same problem, with a Solaris 10 NetBackup 6.5.3 server.
After looking at lots of things, I found the clue in that it worked if I ran
jnbSA from the server itself, but failed when I used my usual console, which is
the Windows Java Display Console.
I also then noted that
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Geyer, Gregory gregory.ge...@avnet.comwrote:
We have all our tape drives (20) assigned to all our media servers (3
main ones, and ~45 that server as SAN media servers, backing only themselves
up).
Dealing with tape drive throughput issues and we've had a
Hi,
I am running Vault to copy images of backups on a VTL to tape. I run a Vault
catalog check after each vault. However, when I look for tapes I do not see any
of the tapes that are used in the vaulting session in the catalog. Vault
process completes successfully.
Has anyone seen anything
Hi,
I have set up all my lifecycle policies. But when I try to inactivate the
policies during the busy hours i get the following error
Caught CORBA SystemException from SSmgrOperations: system exception, ID
'IDL:omg.org/CORBA/NO_PERMISSION:1.0'
OMG minor code (0), described as '*unknown
Do you have multiple NIC on the systems?
We had an issue where the default outgoing path was not what NetBackup expected
and had issues.
We modified the /etc/host.conf to include these lines:
multi on
mdns off
That did the trick...
David McMullin
Interesting.
The following thread says in part:
On further investigation, this stupidity is specific to SuSE and Gentoo
which have patched glibc to support mdns. Debian has an nss-mdns which
is the sane way to implement this functionality.
Bob, I have to disagree with you, for once. You can only use the java
version with that same major revision; it is not backwards compatible to
other revision levels (6.5 is not backwards compatible to 6.0 or lower,
etc.). The java client is forward and backwards compatible within the same
Mr Major said:
Bob, I have to disagree with you, for once.
It's okay; I'm not invested in it. :-) And thanks for the implied kudo.
You can only use the java version with that same major revision;
and
The java client is forward and backwards compatible within the same major
revision -
can anyone tell me what can be the reason of socket read and write error with
error code 23 and 24 in NBU.
+--
|This was sent by monalisa.ku...@wipro.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
20 matches
Mail list logo
