[Veritas-bu] Puredisk experiences ?

Hi We are considering Puredisk for our remote offices and would like to hear other users experiences with it Regards Michael ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] MSEO - How to understand the images are

Also you can disable the MSEO device driver and try a restore. If the restore fail then you are ok. (Assuming that the same restore is fine with MSEO device driver enabled :-) ) Are you sour you want to use Stefanos -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Snapshot errors backing up exchange 07

It appears that this may be addressed in 6.5.3. Symantec gave us a new ubsnt.dll and that seems to have solved this issue. On 4/21/09 12:40 PM, Klebba, Don donkle...@quickenloans.com wrote: I'm getting the following error while backing up one of our exchange 07 storage groups. FTL -

Re: [Veritas-bu] Total Client Data

There are two ways that I know of.. 1. NBConsole has a client backups under Reports you can select the client(s), the time span and run the report and it will show the data being backed up. 2. The Aptare Storage Console product hat a Server Consumption Summary that gives the same

[Veritas-bu] Netbackup Oracle Script for Window Systems

Hello Everyone Is there anyone out there running Oracle on a Windows box? If so can you explain how you are running your script on the client side for Backups? All of our systems are Unix or Linux and the 1 Window system we have is backing up by using some type of Oracle export scheduled task to

Re: [Veritas-bu] Celerra/ndmp incrs running as fulls

I'm explicity defining type=tar and it looks like hist and update are automatically being defined as Y. NEW_STREAM set type=tar /root_vdm_1/Citrixfs 2009-03-09 18:03:36: NDMP: 4: Session 903 (thread ndmp903) Backup type: tar 2009-03-09 18:03:36: NDMP: 4: Session 903 (thread ndmp903)

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Master server hardware - Solaris

I have had both windows and AIX masters. I like AIX better (could be some favoritism here as I am an AIX admin), I boot the server less often. Had to boot the windows master a little more then I liked. From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Total Client Data

Do you have NOM? I wrote a report in Nom that I have show me the total amount for the top 20 servers. (but it could be modified to show all. From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of

Re: [Veritas-bu] Total Client Data

Hi, The source of the raw information is the image database. Here's a script for you. Note, this doesn't take into account multiple copies of one image - it's just a total of the image sizes, ie: sourced data. If you want to have total data written onto the tape, multiply the $19 param by

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Master server hardware - Solaris

Our NBU master used to be on a Sun SPARC V490 running Solaris 9. Very solid but also pretty costly. When we found a better use for the V490 we looked around and finally settled with an HP DL385G2 running Solaris 10 x86 with 4GB of memory. The server is actually faster than the older SPARC box

[Veritas-bu] Decru Dataforts

For those of you out there that have Decru Dataforts has anyone seen an issue where the O/S ( Sun, HP/UX and Linux) loses sight to tape drives and only a reboot of the Decru Datafort solves the problem?? We have been seeing this quite a bit lately and I was wondering if anyone else is having

Re: [Veritas-bu] Decru Dataforts

OMG Yes! We got a datafort about a year ago and about every other week I get into work and all my jobs are hung. It's like my master server just forgets where the drives are. If anyone has a solution, I'd love to hear it. I'm still trying to figure it out. Hudson, Steve wrote: For those of

[Veritas-bu] Know issues running a Solaris Netbackup master server and media servers on Solaris 10 ZFS file system

Are there any know issues running a Solaris Netbackup master server and media servers on Solaris 10 ZFS file system. We are upgrading our Solaris Master server and Media servers to Solaris 10 booting from a ZFS file system. Thanks for help. Jimmy Allen jbal...@firstam.com

Re: [Veritas-bu] Know issues running a Solaris Netbackup master server and media servers on Solaris 10 ZFS file system

Netbackup has problems if the zfs file system fills beyond those of other file systems. -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Allen, Jimmy Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 4:39 PM To:

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Master server hardware - Solaris

There's a white paper out there when Sun was using a T5220 as a media server streaming to about 6-8 StorageTek 1 drives. When we refreshed our NetBackup infrastructure in one location, we did something very similar to this where I have a T5220 as a media server streaming to 6 LTO-4 FC

[Veritas-bu] Restore running too slow

Hi All, I fired a restore from data stored on tapes to USB drive attached to Master . Restore is running 400kb/sec. Data to be restored is around 700GB . With this kind of speed, it will take ages to complete Server A Netbckup 6.5, windows 2000 , F:\drive image has to be retsored to ::

[Veritas-bu] Restore running too slow

You don't mention your original backup speed, nor how this compares to other restores you've done- so it's hard to say if you have a systemic issue or something unique to this situation. 2 thoughts off the top of my head- one you can maybe fix, the other- not so much. 1) Is your server

Re: [Veritas-bu] Restore running too slow

USB drives can be very slow. Have you tried restoring the files to a hard drive and seeing if the problem lies there? How are backup speeds on that same client? Lastly, are the backups heavily multiplexed? That'll slow restores as the tape has to be seeked to find the distributed backup