Thanks to all for the info.
I think we will be ordering several hundred at a time and paying attention
to the labels.
Regards,
John Keating
Information Technology
Tachi-S Engineering U.S.A. Inc.
Len Boyle
Sent by: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
01/15/2010 01:30 PM
To
William Br
William,
We have seen this extra label checking on a unix (solaris) master also. With
our master at 6.5.3 it is not quite so pretty.
I believe that there are several known methods for the serial number that comes
from the tape cart and the serial number recorded in the netbackup data base to
b
Thanks for the clarification. Hopefully I won't be doing that in the future
but it is always good to have ideas on how to make it work if I do.
Jeff
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 5:13 PM, A Darren Dunham wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 04:45:12PM -0700, Jeff Cleverley wrote:
> > Are you modifying t
Well I thought that but see a bit above:
\\.\Tape1, drive serial number HU10606CNF, expected serial number HU10606CNF
That's the drive serial number.
William D L Brown
From: Preston, Douglas [mailto:dlpres...@lereta.com]
Sent: 15 January 2010 15:06
To: William Brown; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.au
Can someone give me correct syntax for file list specification on an
Exchange cluster?
The cluster name is exvs01. If the mailbox is jlightner what is the
specification supposed to look like? The one apparent from the
documents doesn't seem to be working. We're using 6.5.4.
Proud partner
Here we always order new tapes with barcodes that start in sequence with
the end of the last set. Duplicating barcodes is not a good idea.
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of William
B
I was quite surprised to find that NetBckup is not just looking at the tape
label, but also what I think is the cartridge serial number with LTO. I guess
that comes from the LTO-CM. This is 6.5.4
This happened on a Windows Master/Media server in our test lab:
20:00:48.922 [3908.1968] <2> ope
It depends a bit on whether you want to shift all traffic, and whether the
networks are interconnected 'higher up'.
We have a Master that is also a Media Server. Each client has the names of
every interface on the server in the SERVER= entries.
We created static routing for each subnet, for ex