Long ago, I started with NetBackup 3.4 running on a Enterprise 450
running Solaris 2.6 system. Over the years I've upgraded the OS to
Solaris 8, and NetBackup to 4.5, then 5.1, and finally to 6.0mp4.
Now I plan on taking several leaps, but am indecisive on how to take them.
One leap, is from
I'm currently running NetBackup 6.0mp4 on a Solaris 8 server. I'm plan
on moving it to a Solaris 10 server. Any issues if I run NetBackup
within a container (zone)?
On the Solaris 8 server, /usr/openv is a volume from my SAN. Any issue
with moving the volume from my Solaris 8 server to the
system, the problem went away.
PS: http://www.straightrunning.com/XmingNotes/
PS: There is a known font quality issue on Solaris 8 systems, when
displayed on non-Sun displays. Patch 117518-02 resolves this issue.
Matthew Stier wrote:
Platform: Solaris 8 (SPARC)
NetBackup Version: 6.0mp4
Platform: Solaris 8 (SPARC)
NetBackup Version: 6.0mp4
Problem: Starting recently, when I start 'jnbSA' the initial login
dialog box fills the screen, and only the open box icon on the left side
is displaying. The entire right side is blank. No fields. No buttons.
It appears that 'jnbSA'
Same here. But I'm looking into replacing an UE450 with a T2 box. (T5120
or T5220)
Conner, Neil wrote:
Let us know how it goes - I'm looking at doing the same thing with a T2000.
-Neil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris_Millet
Yeap, Another conflict between Sun Microsystems and Cisco.
What Cisco calls Channeling, Sun calls Trunking.
http://www.sun.com/products/networking/ethernet/suntrunking/
Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
0n Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 11:19:59AM +0200, Clem Kruger (C) wrote:
It is better to
This is because you don't have the ports on the Cisco etherswitch
configured correctly.
If you turn off trunk and channel arbitration on the Cisco etherswitch
(ie: set port host) Sun Microsystems servers and workstations connect
without problem.
I've proven this on nearly 200 Ultra-1, 2, 5,
Since your talking remote Windows servers, have you considered
NetBackup PureDisk Remote Office Edition?
It sounds like it fits your needs.
Deiter Scott wrote:
I have been asked what we would plan to do if the following occurs.
A restore is necessary at a remote site which contains a media
olume Pool
in the PTL.
The 5th covers everything else. Nearly a dozen policies that backed up
to two DSSU's, which feed a single Volume Pool.
Ed Wilts wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 05:17:41PM -0400, Matthew Stier wrote:
DSSU's do have their weaknesses. You are typically stuck with
With the recording speeds of todays tape drives, you have to put some
kind of disk in front of them, to ensure you have a steady stream of
data to record. Without it, your just going to wear out the drives,
even faster than before. And no matter how fast tape drives get, they
will never
Anyone in this group, familiar with the Overland Storage NEO-8000 and
it's virtual library (ie: partitioning) capability.
I am running NetBackup 5.1, and have tried partitioning my NEO-8000,
however, every time I attempt this, I loose little things, like being
unable to eject media.
I do have
11 matches
Mail list logo
