Hi Karl-
For 6.5 GA installs of LiveUpdate:
Unix: it's on the 6.5 Options CD, you need to install it separately.
Windows: as you note, it's part of the default install.
And yes, the 6.5.4 patch release includes some liveupdate fixes, that's
what's in the NB_LUA_6.5.4_326410.tar tarball.
HTH
r
John-
What kinds of problems did you have when you first tried this?
Here are the notes I took when I last set up LU, setting it up on 6.5GA and
then patching to 6.5.1.
1) Set up the a disk share to store the LiveUpdate bundles. When you
configure the NetBackup LiveUpdate Agent you must specify
Bob-
You haven't identified your platform of choice for this task, so I assume
you're talking wintel.
But in case I'm wrong, note that the free "preview" app that is part of
MacOS X allows highlighting and annotation of PDFs.
(and FYI http://dealmac.com is a good place to get yourself a Mac for a
It looks to me like you're both right. If I may paraphrase:
Ed: "snapshots are handy for immediate user-initiated file recovery"
Curtis: "in the described configuration, those snapshots will likely
consume lots of space"
Maybe I'm missing some subtext here but I agree with, and see no
conf
Hi Max-
I don't see what you're seeing.
I launch jnbSA on my 6.5.3 master server...
Activity Monitor node...
View --> Filter
Advanced tab
set the Field: to "Policy" ---> I get string comparisons like "starts
with" or "contains"
How does this differ from what you're doing?
thanks
rob
On Wed
David-
I bet you're running into a side effect of the fact that solaris10 wasn't
actually a supported client platform until 5.1 MP2.
To get around this, I would suggest the following sequence:
1. install base 5.1GA
2. patch the base 5.1GA to 5.1MP6
3. install 5.1GA options
4. patch the 5.1GA opt
fyi this is also spelled out in the "Security and Encryption Guide" manual.
http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/290226.htm
Chapter 3, "Port Security"
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 10:22 AM, Daniel Otto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> See my answers below
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL
This thread is pretty much deceased, but I thought I would resurrect
it briefly to point out that the latest entry to the official
NetBackup blog (did you know that there was an official NetBackup
blog? Me neither, until last week...) happens to conclude with the
following statement:
"If yo
there's definitely nothing wrong with the operation you're wondering about,
it's a perfectly routine example of nbpushdata operation. (assuming that
you follow the other recommendations in that technote you reference...)
HTH
rob
On 1/18/08, Scott Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 6.5 Use
Michael-
I have a linux master server that is running 6.5GA, and when I
inventory my robot, I see that my ABC123L1 barcodes ARE getting turned
into ABC123 mediaIDs like they should.
Here's my relevant setting:
Robot Inventory screen --> Advanced Options button --> Media ID Generation tab
Robo
well, bppllist is just parsing the data that it finds in
/usr/openv/netbackup/db/class/*
so depending on the amount / nature of the data you're trying to
extract, you could "roll your own" with cross-platform setuid
scripting of some sort.
not something I'd recommend, but technically feasible and
> -Original Message-
> Christopher Trown
> Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 7:08 PM
> Subject: [Veritas-bu] Help! Lost access to administrative commands.
>
> I hope somebody can help me. Support is flailing. No help at
> all.
>
> I made a few changes via the console GUI and now I d
Even if he WEREN'T an old friend from way back, I would still be
recommending Curtis' books as a fine starting point:
Backup & Recovery
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/9780596102463/index.html
Using SANs and NAS
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/sansnas/index.html
HTH
rob
___
I bet you're pretty busy right about now ;-)
The DST impact upon NetBackup can be summarized thusly:
(1) chance of missed backups (note that this isn't new to 2007, it's an old
bug...)
a backup job with just the wrong set of attributes (including but not
limited to a schedule with a sunday
Just as an FYI...
It's my understanding that this scheduling problem is NOT a result of
the DST changes that start this year. This risk of a missed backup job
existed last spring, and the spring before that, and the spring before
that...
So it's nice that it's finally going to be fixed. (e
Hello Richard-
When your vault job failed, what was the status code?
I know that there was a problem in 6.0 where the scheduler
was incorrectly restarting a "partially successful" vault
job, e.g. a vault job that exited with a status 306 because
not all of the images were successfully duplicated.
Mike-
Is there any chance your tape AXH822 is in the scratch pool?
This situation would crate the exact error you described below.
See also...
http://support.veritas.com/docs/245330
HTH
rob
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 01:30:17PM -0400 or thereabouts, Conner, Mike wrote:
> Hi, I have NB 5.1 MP5...I
There is one sentence that confuses me about Ms. Fisher's
recent CW article:
"One major issue Veritas users cited with NetBackup 6.0 is
that when a backup job indicates it's complete, it often has
only backed up 1K files, so there's no data to restore. "
Whoa, that DOES sound scary. Backed
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 09:40:34PM -0500 or thereabouts, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 02:15:28PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I am trying to see if the old Advanced Reporter Option (ARO) in Netbackup
> > 4.5, 5.0, and 5.1 equate to NOM in the 6.0 versioning, and if so, does it
>
FYI on this topic of NBU support and RedHat 3 in particular...
Ed, you wrote that:
> Fact: NetBackup 6.5, targeted for release in February, 2007, will drop
> support for RHEL 3. RHEL 3 started shipping in October, 2003 and will
> be supported by Red Hat through October, 2010. Symantec will cu
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 08:16:45AM -0700 or thereabouts, Shane Liebling wrote:
>6.0's Vault has Iron Mountain ftp file generation and upload built in,
>though I don't know if you want to upgrade. Our company hasn't. We just
Shane-
I apologize, but I think you are mistaken on two point
Just to follow up, I wanted to point out that the
patch README does attempt to explain the meaning
of the "workaround" text, in the introduction of
the "problems fixed" section:
VI. DESCRIPTION OF PROBLEMS FIXED
=
The following are descriptions of the prob
Here is a pretty thorough-looking
vxss/NBU setup walkthrough on a Unix box:
http://support.veritas.com/docs/281626
It was written against NBU 5.x,
but I have used it to set up 6.0 and the only
differences I observed were some minor cosmetic
screenshot details.
HTH
rob
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at
Try using the "inventory robot" option (aka "vmupdate")
instead of vltinject.
HTH
rob
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 04:10:51PM -0500 or thereabouts, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Hey Guys:
> Need help. I've recently implemented Vault. I would like to move slotted
> media instead of containers at my offs
VRTSat/lib/VxHelpViewerl10n.jar:/opt/VRTSat/lib/vssatgui.jar:/opt/VRTSaz/lib/vssazgui.jar:/opt/VRTSaz/lib/AzWrapper.jar
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 12:44:26PM -0600 or thereabouts, Rob Worman wrote:
> Adam-
>
> I have observed some oddities when it comes to launching the
> vxss GUI. (aka
>
>
> On
Adam-
I have observed some oddities when it comes to launching the
vxss GUI. (aka
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 11:34:30AM -0500 or thereabouts, Wayne T Smith wrote:
> The docs say VxSS is required for NOM.
>
> Perhaps it is important that VxSS 4.2.2.20 is the supported version?
>
> cheers, wayne
>
FYI to those of you using Disk Staging Storage Units,
5.1mp4 includes a change that you're sure to notice:
(from the "DESCRIPTION OF PROBLEMS FIXED" text)
Description:
Disk staging only submits one duplication job at a time so it was unable
to make use of idle tape drives.
Additional
27 matches
Mail list logo