Re: [Veritas-bu] Client Hostnames

2006-10-16 Thread Andrew Stueve
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hillman, > Eric > Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 12:44 PM > To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Client Hostnames > > Thanks for all of your replies. This has been a very interesting and > helpful threa

Re: [Veritas-bu] Client Hostnames

2006-10-02 Thread Weber, Philip
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts Sent: 30 September 2006 15:24 To: Hillman, Eric Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Client Hostnames On 9/29/2006 11:44 AM, Hillman, Eric wrote: > I may have found one is

Re: [Veritas-bu] Client Hostnames

2006-09-30 Thread Martin, Jonathan \(Contractor\)
f Ed Wilts Sent: Sat 9/30/2006 10:24 AM To: Hillman, Eric Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Client Hostnames On 9/29/2006 11:44 AM, Hillman, Eric wrote: > I may have found one issues when using aliases however. Can anyone > confirm that you CANNOT use an ali

Re: [Veritas-bu] Client Hostnames

2006-09-30 Thread Ed Wilts
On 9/29/2006 11:44 AM, Hillman, Eric wrote: > I may have found one issues when using aliases however. Can anyone > confirm that you CANNOT use an alias of the server name when backing > up an Exchange server/cluster? I will confirm that you CAN use an alias. We have a separate backup interface on

Re: [Veritas-bu] Client Hostnames

2006-09-29 Thread David Rock
* Hillman, Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-29 12:44]: > Thanks for all of your replies. This has been a very interesting and > helpful thread. I may have found one issues when using aliases however. > Can anyone confirm that you CANNOT use an alias of the server name when > backing up an Exchan

Re: [Veritas-bu] Client Hostnames

2006-09-29 Thread Martin, Jonathan \(Contractor\)
ubject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Client Hostnames Thanks for all of your replies. This has been a very interesting and helpful thread. I may have found one issues when using aliases however. Can anyone confirm that you CANNOT use an alias of the server name when backing up an Exchange server/cluster? Fro

Re: [Veritas-bu] Client Hostnames

2006-09-29 Thread Paul Keating
enient. Paul -- > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Hillman, Eric > Sent: September 29, 2006 12:44 PM > To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Client Hostnames > > > Tha

Re: [Veritas-bu] Client Hostnames

2006-09-29 Thread Hillman, Eric
ame. Hopefully, this would be the only case that an alias cannot be used. Thanks! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Rock Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 11:19 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] C

Re: [Veritas-bu] Client Hostnames

2006-09-28 Thread David Rock
* Bobby Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-28 05:47]: > > About the FQN's, we don't use them. Why type all of those extra characters? > Our DR strategy is to carry our offsite tapes to one of our other sites and > do our recovery. Without using FQN's, we just bring a development box back > u

Re: [Veritas-bu] Client Hostnames

2006-09-28 Thread Bobby Williams
lisle, D ReneeSent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 3:41 PMTo: Hindle, Greg; Hillman, Eric; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Client Hostnames We do the same thing.  Each server, including the master and media servers have two nics, each with their own name in dns.  One cav

Re: [Veritas-bu] Client Hostnames

2006-09-27 Thread David Rock
* Hillman, Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-27 14:37]: > We have public and backup networks. All clients have a public network > which is typically 100Mb and some clients (larger clients) have a backup > network which is typically GbE. This seems to be pretty typical in > larger organizations.

Re: [Veritas-bu] Client Hostnames

2006-09-27 Thread Martin, Jonathan \(Contractor\)
used everyone too badly. =P  This all works in my little head.     From: Veritas Netbackup [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 3:57 PMTo: Martin, Jonathan (Contractor)Cc: Hillman, Eric; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Client Hostnames Hi Jon/Eric

Re: [Veritas-bu] Client Hostnames

2006-09-27 Thread Veritas Netbackup
" option to your clients which is an extra step, but should make this bullet-proof.   -Jonathan From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hillman, EricSent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 2:38 PMTo: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] Client

Re: [Veritas-bu] Client Hostnames

2006-09-27 Thread Carlisle, D Renee
esday, September 27, 2006 3:02 PMTo: Hillman, Eric; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Client Hostnames We use fully QDN's here. We add 2 nics to each client one with its public name and the other with a private name with NBU at the end. This NBU interface is configu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Client Hostnames

2006-09-27 Thread Martin, Jonathan \(Contractor\)
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hillman, EricSent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 2:38 PMTo: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] Client Hostnames We have public and backup networks.  All clients have a public network which is typically 100Mb

Re: [Veritas-bu] Client Hostnames

2006-09-27 Thread Hindle, Greg
ECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hillman, EricSent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 2:38 PMTo: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] Client Hostnames We have public and backup networks.  All clients have a public network which is typically 100Mb and some clients (l

[Veritas-bu] Client Hostnames

2006-09-27 Thread Hillman, Eric
Title: Client Hostnames We have public and backup networks.  All clients have a public network which is typically 100Mb and some clients (larger clients) have a backup network which is typically GbE.  This seems to be pretty typical in larger organizations.  Given the above scenarios, my qu