Ed is correct.
Multiple Policies can be written to the same DSSU, however, the
contents of a DSSU can only be copied to a single "Volume Pool". So
you going to need at least a unique DSSU for each Volume Pool you want
staged.
In my environment, I have 5 Volume Pools.
The first is a NAS,
VTL licensing was based upon the number of drives, and has or will
transition to capacity of the library.
DSSU is a freebie included in NetBackup 5.x+.
Shyam Hazari wrote:
How does the veritas licensing works for DSSU and VTL ? As far
as I know, VTL is based on capacity. Is their a licens
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 05:17:41PM -0400, Matthew Stier wrote:
> DSSU's do have their weaknesses. You are typically stuck with one-to-one
> ration between DSSU's and policies. This fit my needs, but for those
> with a multitude of policies to manage, I can see them having problems.
We have a lot
How does the veritas licensing works for DSSU and VTL ? As far as I know, VTL is based on capacity. Is their a licensing requirement for DSSU as well ?
TIA
-Shyam
On 4/27/06, Matthew Stier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
With the recording speeds of todays tape drives, you have to put somekind of
With the recording speeds of todays tape drives, you have to put some
kind of disk in front of them, to ensure you have a steady stream of
data to record. Without it, your just going to wear out the drives,
even faster than before. And no matter how fast tape drives get, they
will never match
lf Of Johnny
Oestergaard
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 10:44 AM
To: 'Steven L. Sesar'; 'NetBackup Veritas'
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] DSSU/DSU experience
I have been using DSSU since 5.1 came out.
But I have primarily used it for very slow clients so that I didn't
block my
7;Steven L. Sesar'; 'NetBackup Veritas'
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] DSSU/DSU experience
I have been using DSSU since 5.1 came out.
But I have primarily used it for very slow clients so that I didn't
block my
tapedrives with these backups.
It has been working really fine, except
TECTED] On Behalf Of Steven L.
Sesar
Sent: 27. april 2006 19:09
To: NetBackup Veritas
Subject: [Veritas-bu] DSSU/DSU experience
We're in the process of rearchitecting our BUR infrastructure. The most
profound change will be the addition of disk storage, as we are 100%
tape, right now. We'
veral days afterwards.
>
> G.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Steven L.
> Sesar
> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 10:09 AM
> To: NetBackup Veritas
> Subject: [Veritas-bu] DSSU/DSU experience
>
> We
pril 27, 2006 10:09 AM
To: NetBackup Veritas
Subject: [Veritas-bu] DSSU/DSU experience
We're in the process of rearchitecting our BUR infrastructure. The most
profound change will be the addition of disk storage, as we are 100%
tape, right now. We're considering a few different disk technologies,
We're in the process of rearchitecting our BUR infrastructure. The most
profound change will be the addition of disk storage, as we are 100%
tape, right now. We're considering a few different disk technologies,
such as VTL, DataDomain NAS heads, as well as traditional DSU/DSSUs.
I've heard ane
11 matches
Mail list logo