tape carts and
read lto-2 tape carts.
len
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 6:10 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Cc: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] LTO-4
eived this e-mail in error,
please notify the sender and delete this e-mail from your system.
oersted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/24/2008 05:05 PM
Please respond to
VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
To
VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
cc
Subject
[Veritas-bu] LTO-4
Veritas-bu < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] LTO-4
>
>
>
> Hi Simon,
> yes LTO4 supported on 6.5.
> eventhough on the device type, HCART4 doesn't exist.
>
> Regards,
> mTz
>
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 5:46 PM, WEAVER, Simon (external)
MP5 was the first 6.0 version that officially supported LTO4, we saw the
devices showing up with "limitations" in the wizard during testing with
MP4 but I forget off the top of my head if that was because of Netbackup
or Solaris patches. As previously mentioned, I would also update the
mapping fil
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] LTO-4
Hi Simon,
yes LTO4 supported on 6.5.
eventhough on the device type, HCART4 doesn't exist.
Regards,
mTz
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 5:46 PM, WEAVER, Simon (external)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Doesnt 6.5 support LTO4 ?
-Origi
Check the manual, LTO-4 = 'hcart'
Justin.
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Martin Ruslan wrote:
> Hi Simon,
> yes LTO4 supported on 6.5.
> eventhough on the device type, HCART4 doesn't exist.
>
> Regards,
> mTz
>
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 5:46 PM, WEAVER, Simon (external) <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
__
ROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin
> Piszcz
> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 11:29 AM
> To: moehatdee
> Cc: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] LTO-4
>
> NetBackup 6.0X should support LTO-4, the only change you may need to
I realize that per the specs this should work, but just wondering if
anyone has actually done it. Has anyone written an encrypted tape
using for instance an IBM drive and restored the encrypted data using
an HP drive? This is assuming you were using a compatible
keystore...for instance Netbackup
2008 11:29 AM
> To: moehatdee
> Cc: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] LTO-4
>
> NetBackup 6.0X should support LTO-4, the only change you may need to
> make is you need to upgrade the tpconfig/db file, there is a "mappings"
> upgrade, check
Doesnt 6.5 support LTO4 ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin
Piszcz
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 11:29 AM
To: moehatdee
Cc: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] LTO-4
NetBackup 6.0X should support LTO-4
NetBackup 6.0X should support LTO-4, the only change you may need to make
is you need to upgrade the tpconfig/db file, there is a "mappings"
upgrade, check symantec's site, 6.0MP4 should work fine.
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008, moehatdee wrote:
> I have a plan to upgrade my library from ADIC scalari100
I have a plan to upgrade my library from ADIC scalari100 to
Scalari2000 and LTO-4.
Currently I used NetBackup 6.0 MP4.
Can you inform me please which version of NetBackup software that support LTO-4?
I'am waiting for your information. Thanks.
Regards,
Moehatdee
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Esson, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I recently swapped out a pair of LTO-2 drives for LTO-4 drives on a v5.1
> Media Server and have seen no throughput performance improvement.
>
Were the tape drives the bottleneck before? If not - and for most users,
the ta
du
Subject: [Veritas-bu] LTO-4 on Linux
Folks,
Has anybody out there configured LTO-4 drives on Linux Red Hat ES 4? I
recently swapped out a pair of LTO-2 drives for LTO-4 drives on a v5.1
Media Server and have seen no throughput performance improvement. I did
the same test on a Windows 2003 Se
Folks,
Has anybody out there configured LTO-4 drives on Linux Red Hat ES 4? I
recently swapped out a pair of LTO-2 drives for LTO-4 drives on a v5.1
Media Server and have seen no throughput performance improvement. I did
the same test on a Windows 2003 Server using the same data and saw
signi
15 matches
Mail list logo
