> I believe the talldoode comment was about the dreaded vmquery
> -deassignbyid command, which can definitely shoot you in the foot. In
> recent versions, the command is still there, but it complains if you use
> it.
It does more than complain. It does not process the request in many
situations.
: Re: [Veritas-bu] MP4 Re: Taking the plunge to upgrade from 5.1
MP4to
> No - it was just Dave talldoode statement about the way command were
> recommended to expire tapes. My question was about images so maybe
> bpexpdate will leave the catalog corrupted when it expires the tape.
b
> No - it was just Dave talldoode statement about the way command were
> recommended to expire tapes. My question was about images so maybe
> bpexpdate will leave the catalog corrupted when it expires the tape.
bpexpdate expires images. When you give a volume, it expires all copies
of images on t
No - it was just Dave talldoode statement about the way command were
recommended to expire tapes. My question was about images so maybe
bpexpdate will leave the catalog corrupted when it expires the tape.
Dave said
"oh, just do this to expire that pesky tape" makes me cringe.
Thanks
Carl Mathews
On 11/23/2006 12:47 PM, Scott Jacobson wrote:
> What was the "alias" Ed was referring to
It's an emm alias. If your master or media servers have multiple NICs,
they probably also have multiple names. In this case, you need to tell
emm which alias correspond to which. For example, if you h
What was the "alias" Ed was referring to
>>> Darren Dunham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/23/2006 11:29 AM >>>
>
> Does this mean the problem will appear wherever there are multiple NICs?
> Does anyone use multiple NICs who has not had this issue with MP4? I'd
> have though multiple NICs are pretty c
>
> Does this mean the problem will appear wherever there are multiple NICs?
> Does anyone use multiple NICs who has not had this issue with MP4? I'd
> have though multiple NICs are pretty common these days.
> How did the alias fix the issue?
My server is on two networks. I haven't seen any iss
4 PM
To: Dave Brown
Cc: List Veritas List
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] MP4 and I'm broken
On 11/22/2006 7:38 AM, Dave Brown wrote:
> Turned out it was an issue related to multiple NICs in the machine and
> name resolution. Don't know why the MP had issue with my setup, I
> hav
ECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts
Sent: Thursday, 23 November 2006 1:14 PM
To: Dave Brown
Cc: List Veritas List
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] MP4 and I'm broken
On 11/22/2006 7:38 AM, Dave Brown wrote:
> Turned out it was an issue related to multiple NICs in the machin
On 11/22/2006 7:38 AM, Dave Brown wrote:
> Turned out it was an issue related to multiple NICs in the machine and
> name resolution. Don't know why the MP had issue with my setup, I have
> been running 6.0 this way since it was released.
We ran into this when we did the MP4beta upgrade. It was
hing/Monitoring closely today. do not want any issues over long
weekend
Dave
From: WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 12:50 AM
To: Dave Brown; List Veritas List
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] MP4 and I'm broken
Symant
-
From: Dave Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 November 2006 00:18
To: List Veritas List
Subject: [Veritas-bu] MP4 and I'm broken
So I'd figured I'd take my chances and go to MP4, Now I'm broke. Media
server seems to think it should load the emm database. Master can
] Sent: 02 March 2006
15:53To: WEAVER, Simon;
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] MP4 for
NBU 5.1 Windows 2003
Readme
for Mp4
http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/280425.htm
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER
@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] MP4 for
NBU 5.1 Windows 2003
For 5.1, Yes
From: WEAVER, Simon
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 02,
2006 9:55 AMTo: Steven Cashman;
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] MP4 for
NBU 5.1 Windows
Title: Message
For 5.1, Yes
From: WEAVER, Simon
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006
9:55 AMTo: Steven Cashman;
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] MP4 for
NBU 5.1 Windows 2003
Thank
you. Can you tell me Steve, is MP4 the LATEST MP pack
Title: Message
Readme
for Mp4
http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/280425.htm
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER,
SimonSent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 9:32 AMTo:
'veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu'Subject: [Veritas-bu] MP4 for NBU
5.1 Window
Title: Message
Hi
Does anyone either
have a link for a veritas site that shows what MP4 fixes. a link or readme would
be good. if its too big to send on the list, please send directly to myself.
(tried to find one for MP4, but no luck)
Also, if anyone can
tell me if they have any problems
TED]
-Original Message-
From: DOON ENG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 January 2006 22:03
To: a raja; Conner, Mike; WEAVER, Simon; Ed Wilts
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] MP4
For those with the problem, when VSP does not get cleaned up,
which direct
PM
To: Conner, Mike; WEAVER, Simon; Ed Wilts
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] MP4
Yes we still facing problem. Veritas suggeting that till the fix comes to use
VSS way of backup.
regards
R
--- "Conner, Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We ha
se
> problems with MP4?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: a raja [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Fri 1/6/2006 12:29 PM
> To: WEAVER, Simon; 'Ed Wilts'; Conner, Mike
> Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] MP4
&g
nner, Mike
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] MP4
We did upgraded recently. But we hit problem in win2k3
boxes with VSP problem and C drive getting filled. not
getting deleted.
regards
ary 2006 00:46
> To: Conner, Mike
> Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] MP4
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 03:15:54PM -0500, Conner,
> Mike wrote:
> > I have Windows 2000 NB 5.1 MP1...just a quick
> question...do I have to
> > install t
00:46
To: Conner, Mike
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] MP4
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 03:15:54PM -0500, Conner, Mike wrote:
> I have Windows 2000 NB 5.1 MP1...just a quick question...do I have to
> install the MPs on each individual client?
Yes. If you hav
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 03:15:54PM -0500, Conner, Mike wrote:
> I have Windows 2000 NB 5.1 MP1...just a quick question...do I have to
> install the MPs on each individual client?
Yes. If you have Unix clients you can push the maintenance paks out
from the server, but for Windows clients you need
I have Windows 2000 NB 5.1 MP1...just a quick question...do I have to install
the MPs on each individual client?
Thanks
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Peppas
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 7:13 AM
To: WEAVER, Simon; 'Anthony
25 matches
Mail list logo
