Sure starting to look that way...oh well, thank-you. I'll do some re-aligning
and hope for the best.
+--
|This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(snapsure) files, whereas a PAX type of
backup it is optional.
-Original Message-
From: PGerard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 2:49 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NDMP Incremental backup
Hi everyone. I am backing up an EMC Celerra using
Hi everyone. I am backing up an EMC Celerra using NDMP with one tape drive
attached to each of the data moversthis is working fairly well...at least
way better than the way it was beforebut I do have a question about
incrementals. One of the file systems does pretty much a ful
PGerard Wrote:
but I do have a question about incrementals. One of the file
systems does pretty much a ful everytime the incremental runs. Could
that be a CTIME/MTIME thing? Is there a necessity to turn off CTIME?
Can someone please let me know?
The way incremental backups are
No...all of the other policies for the other file systems are built the exact
same way and they are fine. This particular one has outlook PST files in it,
which are likely quite large, and I doubt they are ALL changing, so I suspect
the time stamp gets modified when the users open it up with
I sure know that my pst file is updated a lot every day. I'm sure that
is the cause of your issue.
-tim
On Jun 3, 2008, at 5:35 PM, PGerard netbackup-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No...all of the other policies for the other file systems are built
the exact same way and they are fine.
