I'm pretty sure George's UCS setup was using SAN and not NBD.
+--
|This was sent by mnab...@gmail.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
Just wanted to follow-up on this older thread I started a few weeks back
and say that nbd for VMware (non-shared storage) is working as intended
at impressive speeds. I've got approximately 50GB of Windows test VMs
and they are consistently pulling 60MB/sec. Granted this is an idle test
system and
.
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of harikrse
Sent: 20 March 2011 06:17 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.0 Installation Guide for Linux
Hi,
Could someone help me
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 5.0 / Windows 2008 R2 / Hyper-V
a) No.
b) No.
c) No.
d) No.
You might be able to get file level backups working with 5, but it's not
supported and you would be running the 32bit client on a 64bit OS.
System State backups
@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 5.0 / Windows 2008 R2 / Hyper-V
Hi, a quick query that I hope an expert can answer quickly and easily and save
a netbackup noob from hours of (possibly pointless) internet searches, so...
Can Netbackup v5:
a) backup Windows 2008 R2 servers?
b) backup Windows
: 304.554.6236
Fax: 304.285.6404
Mobile: 304.224.6815
From: Girish Jorapurkar giris...@yahoo.com
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu, jim.ca...@mylan.com
Date: 05/05/2011 10:01 PM
Subject:Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.1 media server backup issue
Sent by:veritas-bu-boun
6.5.6 I think is the min, but I would goto 7.1 if you can !
Simon
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of mcmonap
Sent: 06 May 2011 14:18
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu
.
mcmonap nbu-fo...@backupcentral.com
Sent by: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
05/06/2011 10:13 AM
Please respond to
VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
To
VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
cc
Subject
[Veritas-bu] Netbackup 5.0 / Windows 2008 R2 / Hyper-V
Hi, a quick query that I hope
Jorapurkar giris...@yahoo.com
cc
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject
Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.1 media server backup issue
Girish,
A file read error is what it appears, however (bpbkar -nocont /
/dev/null) completes with status 0.
Here is where it gets strange. I've also tried creating
: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
jim.ca...@mylan.com
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 9:16 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.1 media server backup issue
Hi All,
We're having a strange
: 304.224.6815
From: Len Boyle len.bo...@sas.com
To: jim.ca...@mylan.com jim.ca...@mylan.com,
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Date: 05/06/2011 04:31 PM
Subject:Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.1 media server backup issue
Sent
,
veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Date: 05/06/2011 04:04 PM
Subject:Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.1 media server backup issue
Sent by:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
When we've encountered these issues and the logs were no help, we had to
narrow down
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of mcmonap
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 9:18 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 5.0 / Windows 2008 R2 / Hyper-V
Hi, a quick query
Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Justin
Piszcz
Sent: 04 May 2011 14:10
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.1 Question (rollback)
Hi,
Aside from taking a catalog
Recovery using HCB
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Justin
Piszcz
Sent: 04 May 2011 14:10
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.1 Question (rollback
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of WEAVER,
Simon (external)
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 11:34 AM
To: Justin Piszcz
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.1 Question (rollback)
My suggestion for this, is because I felt the 7.1 EMM may
Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon
(external)
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 7:36 AM
To: stefanos; Justin Piszcz
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.1
Hi All,
We're having a strange problem when the media server (AIX 6.1) is backing
up itself. This problem only occurs when the media server attempts to back
up itself. The media server can back up other clients just fine. Other
media servers can back up this media server just fine.
Here is the
I have few questions:
- What is in the backup selection.
- Follow NFS and cross mount points selected
- Try splitting up the backup selection in multiple streams and pin point
exactly which file or folder is creating problem.
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 9:15 AM, jim.ca...@mylan.com wrote:
Hi All,
@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.1 Question (rollback)
Hi,
Aside from taking a catalog backup and re-installing, what is the way to
back down from 7.1 to 7.0.1?
In the past you could run the postuninstall scripts.
How does this work with 7.1?
So far 7.1 has been working good
-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of harikrse
Sent: 27 April 2011 13:52
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup+Windows2008
Hi All,
Kindly Help me in providing the Best Backup Solution
I was just reading through the NetBackup for VMware 7.1 Administrator's
Guide and it looks to me like there are no options to implement this
policy type other than at locations that have shared VM storage (by
presenting the luns to the master.) This seems very strange to me, given
that tons of
: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup for vSphere 4
I was just reading through the NetBackup for VMware 7.1 Administrator's Guide
and it looks to me like there are no options to implement this policy type
other than at locations that have shared VM storage (by presenting the luns to
the master.) This seems very
the NBD transfer type or NBDSSL transfer type.
-Jonathan
From: George Winter [mailto:george_win...@symantec.com]
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 1:14 PM
To: Martin, Jonathan; nbu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup for vSphere 4
Hi Jonathan.
You can implement the NetBackup for VMware solution
Of Martin, Jonathan
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 10:39 AM
To: George Winter; nbu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup for vSphere 4
Thanks for the clarification George. The guide says the datastore must be
available to the backup host several times on pgs 17 (diagram) ,23 (Table 2-1)
24 (Notes). Perhaps
, Jonathan' jmart...@intersil.com, 'George Winter'
george_win...@symantec.com, 'nbu' veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
cc
Subject
Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup for vSphere 4
I wonder what impact this has to backup speeds??
Scott Chapman
Senior Technical Specialist
Storage and Database Administration
I've never run into an environment that used NBDSSL. However, NBD and SAN
based VMware backups using VCB or vStorage are quite common.
NBD is typically used when you are not using shared storage, and all backup
traffic is over the LAN, usually over the console port of the VMware host.
It's
Just stick a standard client on it. Since you are running iSCSI, much of the
Enterprise functionality probably will not be supported until Symantec get's
off their lazy butt's to support iSCSI better. To them, it's not an
enterprise, solution. A bunch of old fart's from the Veritas days me
Hello,
How has everyone's 7.1 experience been?
Any gotchas or things to look out for?
Justin.
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Hi,
I noticed it starts up a lot of services with 7.1
# rc.d/init.d/netbackup start
NetBackup Authentication daemon not started.
NetBackup network daemon started.
NetBackup client daemon started.
NetBackup SAN Client Fibre Transport daemon started.
NetBackup Bare Metal Restore Boot Server daemon
, 2011 12:29 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.1
Hello,
How has everyone's 7.1 experience been?
Any gotchas or things to look out for?
Justin.
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Lightner, Jeff wrote:
There appear to be differences in where fully qualified domain names
need to be used.
We have moved most of our environment to 7.1 but do have a few
outstanding issues:
Can't backup SQL 2000 on MS 2000 (not supported - we put the NBU 6.5.4
: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.1
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Lightner, Jeff wrote:
There appear to be differences in where fully qualified domain names
need to be used.
We have moved most of our environment to 7.1 but do have a few
outstanding issues:
Can't backup SQL 2000 on MS 2000 (not supported - we
.
-Original Message-
From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:jpis...@lucidpixels.com]
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 12:40 PM
To: Lightner, Jeff
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.1
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Lightner, Jeff wrote:
There appear to be differences
How has everyone's 7.1 experience been?
It runs filesystem backups well in the lab.
Any gotchas or things to look out for?
Things you would expect to be found in FA and to be in LBN before you
discover it the hard way, including
- upgrade of a solaris master with windows clients fails/takes
Do you have Windows Master Server?
We ran upgrade on a standalone Windows Master Server and it went well. However,
hot catalog backup failed with status code 2 on Windows Master.
Had to download n install patch from Symantec's website which replaced
bpbrm.exe and that solved the problem.
Hi,
Not sure who this was directed to, using Linux here, but good to know
about that issue, thanks.
Justin.
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, sandesh wrote:
Do you have Windows Master Server?
We ran upgrade on a standalone Windows Master Server and it went well.
However, hot catalog backup failed
Hi All,
Kindly Help me in providing the Best Backup Solution for Windows2008 server in
Netbackup.
I have 2 Windows2008 servers which are NAS boxes along with P4500 and hence
NDMP is not applicable here, so the NAS will have to go as LAN, what is the
best approach to design Policy with that
The Host Master Key (HMK) and the Key Protection Key (KPK) are meant to prevent
someone with access to the KMS data file from deciphering its contents. You
need to know both the KPK and the HMK to be able to decrypt the KMS data file.
If someone has access to the passphrases used to create the
If I were to have my Information Security team provide only one of the
passphrases when setting up the KMS database, which one would it be?
In other words, which one would be required to rebuilt the entire databsae, and
without it I would not be able to re-create any of the keys used by the
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup w/IBM LTO-5 Question
We are running 7.1 FA for some time now with LTO-5 and have not seen any
issue so far.
Best Regards,
Bart WALLEBROEK
Backup Admin Systems Applications Management Support Specialist
Enterprise
2011 06:32:42 -0400 (EDT)
From: Justin Piszcz jpis...@lucidpixels.com
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup w/IBM LTO-5 Question
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Message-ID: alpine.deb.2.02.1103230627200.14...@p34.internal.lan
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII
Hi,
I
@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup reports
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
___
Veritas-bu maillist
: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup reports
What version of Nbu are you using?
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Tewksbury, Kevin ktewksb...@limitedbrands.com
Sender: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 10:35:13
To: Veritas Forum
(veritas-bu
AM
To: 'ccosta@gmail.com'; veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu; Veritas
Forum (veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu)
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup reports
Sorry, I should have mentioned that. We are on Netbackup 6.5.4
Kevin R Tewksbury
Sr. Database Administrator
LimitedBrands
Hi,
I was reviewing:
http://www.symantec.com/business/support/resources/sites/BUSINESS/content/live/TECHNICAL_SOLUTION/76000/TECH76495/en_US/nbu_7x_hcl.pdf
I only see the HP LTO-5 drives in this document.
Can anyone confirm if IBM LTO-5 tape drives are supported with NBU 7.0.1?
Is anyone using
...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Justin
Piszcz
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 6:33 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup w/IBM LTO-5 Question
Hi,
I was reviewing:
http://www.symantec.com/business/support/resources/sites/BUSINESS/conten
t/live/TECHNICAL_SOLUTION
).
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Justin
Piszcz
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 6:33 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup w/IBM LTO-5 Question
Hi,
I
-0700
From: Crowey netbackup-fo...@backupcentral.com
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Not Using Backup NIC
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Message-ID: 1300686385.m2f.351...@www.backupcentral.com
Gidday, with respect to ...
The REQUIRED_INTERFACE option in bp.conf/registry might be what you
Hi,
Could someone help me to provide me the documents or the link for the Netbackup
7.0 Linux Installation Document for Master Server/Media Server as well Client
Install with Pictorial Representation which would be more helpfull for me.
Senthil.H
Piszcz
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 5:38 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.1GA
Hi,
Apparently its out now:
http://www.symantec.com/connect/forums/netbackup-71-now-available
But, I don't see it on the FTP site?
ftp://ftp.nbu.support.veritas.com/pub/support
Hello John
The REQUIRED_INTERFACE option in bp.conf/registry might be what you are
after
A route through eth2 for contacting your backup server might be an option
Regards
Michael
2011/3/18 Crowey netbackup-fo...@backupcentral.com
Gidday, I'm trying to troubleshoot some really bad performance
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Crowey
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 9:08 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Not Using Backup NIC
Gidday, I'm trying to troubleshoot some really bad performance issues when
writing to disc for NetBackup
, Simon
(external)
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.1GA
Netbackup 7.1 has gone generally available after over 315 customers
installed the software for a total of 4000 days of usage. 40% of those
customers installed it into a production environment.
How customers can access
Gidday, I'm trying to troubleshoot some really bad performance issues when
writing to disc for NetBackup differentials, and as part of that process I
noticed that NetBackup is not using the backup NIC I have configured on our
main server.
Our main server has two NICs configured, eth0 on
: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Crowey
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 10:08 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Not Using Backup NIC
Gidday, I'm trying to troubleshoot some really bad
This is typical behavior.
On most systems, the routing of each packet is determined when the
packet is about to be sent. Just because it comes in a NIC, does't mean
it will response will respond through the same NIC.
Since you have multiple interfaces to the same logical network, the
(external)
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.1GA
Netbackup 7.1 has gone generally available after over 315 customers
installed the software for a total of 4000 days of usage. 40% of those
customers installed it into a production environment.
How customers can access the software:
Symantec
Hi,
Apparently its out now:
http://www.symantec.com/connect/forums/netbackup-71-now-available
But, I don't see it on the FTP site?
ftp://ftp.nbu.support.veritas.com/pub/support/products/NetBackup_Enterprise_Server/
Thoughts?
Justin.
___
Veritas-bu
Apparently it isn't on fileconnect either.
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Justin
Piszcz
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 8:40 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu
: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.1GA
Hi,
Apparently its out now:
http://www.symantec.com/connect/forums/netbackup-71-now-available
But, I don't see it on the FTP site?
ftp://ftp.nbu.support.veritas.com/pub/support/products/NetBackup_Enterpr
ise_Server/
Thoughts?
Justin
Thakns :)
-Original Message-
From: Marianne Van Den Berg [mailto:mvdb...@stortech.co.za]
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 2:40 PM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external); 'jpis...@lucidpixels.com';
'veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu'
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.1GA
You can no longer
I have a few road-warrior clients with laptops that connect to our network
via OpenVPN, meaning they have an encrypted connection, but they share an IP
address as far as NetBackup sees, and connections can only be made from the
client to the backup server.
I understand this precludes scheduled
Dear All,
We are on Veritas Netbackup 7.0 on RHEL 5.4.
I got a requirement related to access control.
Where One of the user have Full access and Other User only can re-run the
failed backup or just run the backups.
As of now I am using a single user to do all.
I know I can create a user in
...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Martin,
Jonathan
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 5:16 PM
To: Wayne Smith; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup with clients on a VPN?
We currently use a home grown application to backup our
Create one new user in linux and in /usr/openv/java/auth.conf file make the
following entry assuming new user name as newuser
newuser ADMIN=AM JBP=AM
This will give new user access only to the activity monitor and user will be
able to restart/resume the failed jobs
Thanks,
Saran
On Tue,
: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.1GA
Thakns :)
-Original Message-
From: Marianne Van Den Berg [mailto:mvdb...@stortech.co.za]
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 2:40 PM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external); 'jpis...@lucidpixels.com';
'veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu'
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.1GA
Hi,
Can I change to disable those services that I'm not using? For
example, we don't use Bare-Metal-Restore nor Storage-Lifecycle Policies.
Or is it standard procedure to start all services even though you may
not use some of them?
Thanks!
Jorge
___
You want to disable it on WINDOWS OR UNIX ?
Rgds
A D
Email : abhishek.dhin...@in.ibm.com
Jorge Fábregas jorge.fabre...@gmail.com
Sent by: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
03/04/2011 04:57 PM
To
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
cc
Subject
[Veritas-bu] Netbackup Services
Hi
Implementing NetBackup Database Agent backups for Oracle.
Using the NetBackup provided sample script as the basis for the backup script.
/usr/openv/netbackup/ext/db_ext/oracle/samples/rman/hot_database_backup.sh
How does everyone deal with exposing the TARGET_CONNECT_STR?
Using the example
I believe the NetBackup Oracle DataBase template was designed for this.
Sent from my mobile
On Feb 15, 2011, at 10:09 AM, Snyder, Nicholas A (IS)
nicholas.sny...@ngc.com wrote:
Implementing NetBackup Database Agent backups for Oracle.
Using the NetBackup provided sample script as the basis
I don't recall the sample, but we use os authentication (I.e., connect
target; ... no passwords ... os authentication).
Cheers, Wayne
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Snyder, Nicholas A (IS)
nicholas.sny...@ngc.com wrote, in part:
Implementing NetBackup Database Agent backups for Oracle.
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Wayne T Smith
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 11:55 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: EXT :Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup RMAN Connect String
I don't recall the sample, but we use os authentication (I.e., connect
target
For the Hyper-v host, you probably only need a SAN media sever, as you won't to
using it to backup anything else, right? That is if the one node is able to
backup all the other nodes i the cluster without having to pull data across the
network.
Mylan, Inc.
5005 Greenbag Road
Morgantown, WV 26501
jack.fores...@mylan.com
Phone: +1.304.554.6039
Cell: +1.412.805.5313
From: scott.geo...@parker.com
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Date: 01/30/2011 12:05 AM
Subject:Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 5000 Series replication?
Sent
We are in the market for a new backup/replication system.
We are looking at using NetBackup 7 with a NetBackup appliance, probably the
5020.
Is anyone using a NBU 5000 series device for replication?
How do you like it?
How was the setup?
How much data do you backup?
After dedup how much data do
around.
From:
sfischer netbackup-fo...@backupcentral.com
To:
VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Date:
01/29/2011 01:10 PM
Subject:
[Veritas-bu] NetBackup 5000 Series replication?
Sent by:
veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
We are in the market for a new backup/replication system.
We
Thanks Ken for sharing great exchange backup / restore demos. Really useful
stuff.
Regards,
Saran
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:57 PM, Ken Schonberg
ken_schonb...@symantec.comwrote:
*Introducing the NetBackup Screencast Demonstration Video Series*
The NetBackup Screencast Demonstration Videos
Introducing the NetBackup Screencast Demonstration Video Series
The NetBackup Screencast Demonstration Videos are a group of short videos
designed to demonstrate specific functions and procedures within NetBackup.
They have been produced by Symantec NetBackup Product Support to help you get
Symantec reccommends installing Netbackup 7 Media server on your Hype-V host
for better backup performance..
I have a 4 node CSV Hyper-V environment and want advice on the best
configuration for Netbackup
1x Master Server
4 x Media server licenses (1 for each node)
or
2x Media server
The ease of the upgrade depends on many things. The type of servers you have,
number of clients, etc.
You'll want to look at the HCL find out if your hardware meets the minimum
requirements for NBU 7.x.
Windows 2000 is no longer supported, neither are several 32 Bit OS's.
It seems most eveyone
http://www.symantec.com/business/support/index?page=contentid=TECH147815actp=RSS
The marquee features of NetBackup 7.1 include:
- Disaster Recovery
- AIR: Auto Image Replication
- Virtualization
- Linux single file restore for VMware
- Smart Policies for VMware
-
...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
01/05/2011 09:45 AM
To
VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
cc
Subject
Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6 to Netbackup7
Netbackup upgrade from 6.X to 7.X is like a piece of cake. Very very
smooth if compared to 5.X to 6.X upgrade. We upgraded our environment in
less than two hours
Hi,
I have a quick question regarding configuration of a Netbackup Media Unix
server.
Basically, I have an underlying issue with the presentation of a zoned ADIC
tape drive to a Solaris 10, T5220 media server which im currently working on
(if anyone knows how to get Solaris to see the zoned
...@backupcentral.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 09:44
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup media server question
Hi,
I have a quick question regarding configuration of a Netbackup Media Unix
server.
Basically, I have an underlying issue
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 8:44 AM, bfcsaus
netbackup-fo...@backupcentral.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a quick question regarding configuration of a Netbackup Media Unix
server.
Basically, I have an underlying issue with the presentation of a zoned ADIC
tape drive to a Solaris 10, T5220 media server
Thanks Jim / Jeffc for the replies, i'll go with your advice and only have the
1 robot available to 1 media server. I had no problem installing on Redhat but
will continue my Solaris investigations.
I'll read the admin guide but I presume after the tape drives are presented to
the media server
: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6 to Netbackup7
Sent: Jan 5, 2011 6:47 AM
Hi All,
Can you please provide me the challenges encountered during the netbackup
upgrade from NB6 to NB7 and what are the things to be taken care. Any version
(6.x to 7.x)
Senthil.H
: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.1
Hi,
Yes but there are some good features here:
http://www.symantec.com/business/support/index?page=contentid=TECH143890ke
y=15143actp=LIST
There is also an option to open a case on 7.1. I wonder who is testing
it? :)
Justin.
On Tue, 4 Jan 2011, smpt wrote
Netbackup upgrade from 6.X to 7.X is like a piece of cake. Very very smooth
if compared to 5.X to 6.X upgrade. We upgraded our environment in less than
two hours.
Thanks,
Saranjit
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 3:47 AM, harikrse
netbackup-fo...@backupcentral.comwrote:
Hi All,
Can you please provide
Hello,
We have an infinite retention policy for all our backups. However we had a
restore request for one of the client and while checking images for that client
using bpimagelist, we found out that the image has an expiry date. We went back
to policy to find out that retention on the
...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
dushyant.me...@barclayscapital.com [dushyant.me...@barclayscapital.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 13:22
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5.5 Policy Retention issue
Hello,
We have an infinite retention policy for all our backups
Hi,
Is anyone using it?
Any initial results/comments?
Justin.
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
, 2011 12:36 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.1
Hi,
Is anyone using it?
Any initial results/comments?
Justin.
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman
-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.1
Hi,
Is anyone using it?
Any initial results/comments?
Justin.
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 4:35 AM, Justin Piszcz jpis...@lucidpixels.comwrote:
Is anyone using it?
Any initial results/comments?
It's out of beta but I suspect that the beta customers are still bound by an
NDA until it's FA. The FA release is expected this month.
.../Ed
Hi All
My netbackup infrastructure is running AIX 5.3 , 64 bit OS and verion
of netbackup is 6.5.5
It was previously on 6.5.4 , but after symantec recommendation, i updraded
it to 6.5.5.Infrastructure is resposible of taking 35-40 TB daily backup
with around more then 150 SAN media
2010 15:51:39 +0530
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5.5 on AIX 5.3 , 64 bit - NBRB problem
Hi All
My netbackup infrastructure
is running AIX 5.3 , 64 bit OS and verion of netbackup is 6.5.5
It was previously on 6.5.4 , but after
symantec recommendation, i updraded it to 6.5.5
@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
cc
Subject
RE: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5.5 on AIX 5.3 , 64 bit - NBRB problem
We also faced same issue and below is the Symantec recommendation which
resolved it
There are two things I would recommend to minimize these kinds of things
happening in the future. Both
Second link was specifically for our netbackup environment. You can also see if
you any left over CORBA handles
Regards,
Saranjit Singh Brar
To: saranb...@live.com
CC: saranb...@hotmail.com; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5.5 on AIX 5.3 , 64 bit
201 - 300 of 1828 matches
Mail list logo
