I know I know it is not supported anymore and we are trying to upgrade
but business reasons do not permit it at this time. That being said we
have an issue with 5.1 MP5 and Oracle Rman backups. Seems every day we
get jobs in the activity monitor that have a PID and a Client Name but
nothing else.
...
-Original Message-
From: Wayne Smith [mailto:w...@maine.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 3:02 PM
To: Hudson, Steve
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 5.1 MP5
If using the scripted rman procedure, you can specify policy/class and
schedule
for us pushing ahead with the 6.5 upgrade.
-Original Message-
From: Wayne Smith [mailto:w...@maine.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 3:02 PM
To: Hudson, Steve
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 5.1 MP5
If using the scripted rman procedure
If using the scripted rman procedure, you can specify policy/class and
schedule in the allocate channel stmt(s) to cause the backup server
to use the ones you want. I can give example of syntax, if required.
Also, this can happen if the client nodename is not exactly the same
as what's defined in
NUMBER_DATA_BUFFERS
http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/183702.htm
http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/244652.htm
From: Dyck, Jonathan
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 October 2006
17:19To: Clooney, David;
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup
5.1 MP5
: Tuesday, October 24,
2006 4:55 AMTo: Dyck, Jonathan;
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup
5.1 MP5 restore failures: SC 42
Couple of technotes regarding buffers, buffers
are a delicate scenario , make sure your read the docs well and understand them
before
Hi
all,
Since
hardware support and Veritas support seem to be getting nowhere on my problem,
thought I'd hit the DL up to see if anyone's run into this problem
before.
Here's
the environment:
1
Wintel Master, 3 Wintel +3 Solaris media servers(5.1
MP5)
SSO,
all LTO3 drives
Hmm, seems port 13720 isn't accepting
connections... now to figure out why.
Anyone have any advice?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dyck,
JonathanSent: Monday, October 23, 2006 7:40 AMTo:
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup
@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup
5.1 MP5 restore failures: SC 42
Hmm, seems port 13720 isn't accepting
connections... now to figure out why.
Anyone have any advice?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dyck,
JonathanSent: Monday, October 23
master_server
From: Clooney, David
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 23,
2006 12:01 PMTo: Dyck, Jonathan;
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup
5.1 MP5 restore failures: SC 42
Agreed , keep a tail on your bprd log on the master to
see whats
] Sent: 25 April 2006
21:22To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject:
[Veritas-bu] Netbackup 5.1 MP5 released into the wildFYI,
It appears that 5.1 MP5 has been released.Among lots of fixes, seems
to address some dssu relocation "issues".-- -Tim
This email is for the intended
11 matches
Mail list logo
