and I’d
eliminate the 134s. I might try that.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin Piszcz
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006
7:10 AM
To:
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Re-queuing
jobs due to busy resources(134)
Does anyone know
erine ASent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 12:12 PMTo:
Justin PiszczCc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject:
RE: [Veritas-bu] Re-queuing jobs due to busy resources(134)
What version of
NetBackup are you running?
There are some
entries you can put into bp.conf:
WAIT_IN_QUEUE =
YESQUEUE_ON_
erine ASent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 12:12 PMTo:
Justin PiszczCc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject:
RE: [Veritas-bu] Re-queuing jobs due to busy resources(134)
What version of
NetBackup are you running?
There are some
entries you can put into bp.conf:
WAIT_IN_QUEUE =
YESQUEUE_ON_
-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin
PiszczSent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 9:10 AMTo:
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] Re-queuing
jobs due to busy resources(134)Does anyone know which
kernel sysctl or configuration option or
-queuing jobs due to busy
resources(134)Does anyone know which kernel sysctl or
configuration option or netbackup? option is related to this error?Is it
the number of maximum file descriptors or the fd limit?Anyone ever get
these in the past and then fix the issue?
Thanks,Justin.
This email
Does anyone know which kernel sysctl or configuration option or netbackup? option is related to this error?Is it the number of maximum file descriptors or the fd limit?Anyone ever get these in the past and then fix the issue?
Thanks,Justin.
