[Veritas-bu] SLP duplications for VMDK (flashbackup-windows) images.

Currently running NetBackup 7.1.0.3 and wondering if there is any support for using SLP's to duplicate VMDK backup images created using flashbackup-windows type policies? If I try to designate an SLP for the Policy Storage in this type of VMDK policy, I receive an error There is no snapshot

Re: [Veritas-bu] SLP duplications for VMDK (flashbackup-windows) images.

Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of John Meyers Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 9:01 AM To: Veritas Subject: [Veritas-bu] SLP duplications for VMDK (flashbackup-windows) images. Currently running NetBackup 7.1.0.3

Re: [Veritas-bu] SLP with Synthetic backups - What are people doing for workarounds?

Hi, Basically, What I have been told by Symantec is that the full synthetic process was not aware of the SLP and therefore the image was re-created it was without the SLP information. The good workaround was to use vault duplication. Indeed that should be now fixed in one of the 7.1 releases. A

Re: [Veritas-bu] SLP with Synthetic backups - What are people doing for workarounds?

process is finished? Thanks, Kevin veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu wrote on 02/20/2012 10:23:06 PM: From: David Stanaway da...@stanaway.net To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU, Date: 02/20/2012 10:23 PM Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] SLP with Synthetic backups - What are people doing

Re: [Veritas-bu] SLP with Synthetic backups - What are people doing for workarounds?

I am happy to report this was seemingly silently fixed in 7.1 (At least in 7.1.0.3), the only oddity is that each backup job seems to spawn it's own SLP duplication job, so you will see hundreds of SLP duplication jobs queued. Now can anyone say if SLP and GRT backups are going to work

[Veritas-bu] SLP Help!!

Hi All, Environment Linux RHxx NBU 6.5.6. If I run bpimagelist -stl_complete I get output. If I run nbstlutil list or stlilist there is no output. If I run the above with a backupid from the bpimagelist output, still nothing. The same applies if I use a client name or a mediaid, nothing.

Re: [Veritas-bu] SLP ??

mailto:da...@stanaway.net *To:* veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu mailto:veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu *Sent:* Saturday, January 08, 2011 12:55 AM *Subject:* Re: [Veritas-bu] SLP ?? SLP policies can be checked for compliance also. I have a daily script that check for any

Re: [Veritas-bu] SLP ??

08, 2011 12:55 AM Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] SLP ?? SLP policies can be checked for compliance also. I have a daily script that check for any incomplete SLP images and sends backup admins a nastygram. It has not fired yet due to fast opt dupe on out datadomains :). My only gripes

[Veritas-bu] SLP ??

Hello Geeks, I am looking for some of the advantages of SLP. All I think is that we can duplicate data and with diffrent retention periods?Wat else? Thanks,Pranav batra ___ Veritas-bu maillist -

Re: [Veritas-bu] SLP ??

unless you really need to From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of pranav batra Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 3:11 PM To: Veritas Subject: [Veritas-bu] SLP ?? Hello Geeks, I am looking for some of the advantages of SLP

Re: [Veritas-bu] SLP ??

unless you really need to *From:*veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] *On Behalf Of *pranav batra *Sent:* Friday, January 07, 2011 3:11 PM *To:* Veritas *Subject:* [Veritas-bu] SLP ?? Hello Geeks, I am looking for some of the advantages

[Veritas-bu] SLP with Synthetic backups - What are people doing for workarounds?

I'm getting very frustrated about having to re-invent the wheel to reproduce the functionality of Storage Lifecycle Policies for my Synthetic Full backups. For those not aware, Synthetic backup images for some dumb reason that hasn't been explained to me cannot be managed by an SLP and you will

[Veritas-bu] SLP

- So what I understand you are doing is using the SLP to get around the boundaries of tape pools being assigned to a given media, this way all the data gets backed up by a pool of all of the tapes as one group? - Yes, we backup to disk into one or two pools, with a short retention (SLP

[Veritas-bu] SLP behavior question

I'm starting to mess around myself. I've not made any changes to the default parameters for the LIFECYCLE_PARAMETERS. Here's the defaults as defined in the manual: MIN_KB_SIZE_PER_DUPLICATION_JOB 8192 MAX_KB_SIZE_PER_DUPLICATION_JOB=25600 MAX_MINUTES_TIL_FORCE_SMALL_DUPLICATION_JOB 30 The

[Veritas-bu] SLP behavior question

So I'm messing around with SLP's and want to make sure the behavior I'm seeing is expected. Basically what I see is that every SLP relocation is broken out with one client per job. With DSSU relocation you can set the STAGING_JOB_KB_LIMIT and it will group all of the clients into larger jobs not

Re: [Veritas-bu] SLP - doing it manually

Message- From: RKastner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2008 1:04 PM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] SLP - doing it manually Hello David, we have the same problem and we passed an Enhancement Request to Symantec. Even you start the SLP manually

[Veritas-bu] SLP - doing it manually

Hello David, we have the same problem and we passed an Enhancement Request to Symantec. Even you start the SLP manually you will have the same problem. You can try to use different volume pools regards Roland +-- |This was

[Veritas-bu] SLP - doing it manually

When running Storage Life Cycle Policies, jobs queue up for duplication. When the duplication jobs run, it first allocates a tape drive, then searches for a tape. If either the source or destination tape it needs is already in use, the duplication job sits there queued, waiting for the tape.